Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:43:27AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
>> Thanks again for your input. I am rebuilding and retesting with
>> these changes. Once that is done, I'll post an updated webrev.
>>
>
> i couldn't wait. :)
> more comments are below.
> ed
>
>
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:43:27AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
>
> Thanks again for your input. I am rebuilding and retesting with
> these changes. Once that is done, I'll post an updated webrev.
>
i couldn't wait. :)
more comments are below.
ed
--
usr/src/lib/libbrand/common/libbrand.
Seems like a feature. vnet1 is in standby, so the active link in the ipmp
group (vnet0) is used for the zones.
Is the desire to have both interfaces used by zones for additional
bandwidth? Do the zones need ipmp as well, or is it ok if a link
failure takes out some of the zones? I'm guessing z
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 15:09 -0700, Erik Nordmark wrote:
> Does the initial placement on something different than vnet1 cause a
> problem? Or is it just confusing?
Hi Erik,
In this case it is just causing some confusion but functionality is not
impacted.
Thanks,
Lewis
_
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 12:56 -0700, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> In the global zone, do you have two ip addresses (one on vnet0, one on vnet1)
> or is vnet1 configured as standby?
Hi Steve,
We have the following global zone config:
vnet0: flags=1000843 mtu 1500
index 2
inet 13
Bernd Schemmer wrote:
> Can I use Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 Containers in OpenSolaris?
>
> I installed the packages for both but could not create a Solaris 8 or
> Solaris 9 zone. zonecfg always complained about a not supported brand.
>
> I'm running Solaris snv_89
No, this is only supported on S1
Can I use Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 Containers in OpenSolaris?
I installed the packages for both but could not create a Solaris 8 or
Solaris 9 zone. zonecfg always complained about a not supported brand.
I'm running Solaris snv_89
regards
Bernd
--
Bernd Schemmer, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
htt
