this should never happen. please file a bug.
are you seeing this on s11 or s10?
could you also provide more deails about how you hit this problem and
what you did to fix it? (if you could provide a way to reproduce this
problem that'd be great.)
ed
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:00:19PM +1300,
...
If you or anybody else on the list have another idea of how to run
trilld from inside a Container I would love to know.
Thank you for your interest and time.
Regards.
Daniel.
2012/8/21 Edward Pilatowicz edward.pilatow...@oracle.com
you can't create vnics from inside a zone. (it's
you can't create vnics from inside a zone. (it's not supported.)
but the global zone can create additional vnics and give them to the
zone. the easiest way to do this is to have the global zone
administrator update the zonecfg for you zone to include multiple anet
resources, one for each vnic
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:56:23AM -0800, Ian Collins wrote:
On 02/20/12 10:06 PM, gerard henry wrote:
hello all,
after upgrading from S11X to S11, i'm unable to attach a zone due
to a missing publisher. I'm trying to remove the old publisher but
i have this:
root@electre:~# pkg -R
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:44:23AM -0600, Derek McEachern wrote:
Thought I would just send an update on this. Thanks for the all the
suggestions.
To get around our particular issue I just added some retry logic to the
/etc/init.d/ script. When it runs it if finds that the operation has failed
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:41:44AM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/11/11 08:01 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/11/11 02:39 AM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Thu 10 Nov 2011 at 08:32PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 10/10/11 07:20 PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
by default packages that get installed into a zone
you should safely be able to delete that publisher from the zones. (in
s11, zones inherit publishers from the global zone so they don't
actually need any local publisher configuration.)
ed
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 02:13:24PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
I'm trying to reattach my zones on a newly
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:57:12PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
On 09/29/11 09:50 AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
nfs server is now supported in a zone on s11.
smb server is not.
OK, thanks Ed.
I thought the original ARC case for PRIV_SYS_SHARE would have enabled both?
it's not just a matter
nfs server is now supported in a zone on s11.
smb server is not.
ed
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:19:34PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
Has the restriction on sharing ZFS filesystems vis nfs or smb from
a zone been removed in the Solaris 11 branch yet?
If not, will it be?
Thanks.
--
Ian.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:32:48AM -0700, Mike DeMarco wrote:
Is it possible to add a new zfs filesystem to a zone without rebooting the
zone?
I have a need to add a filesystem to a zone for a couple of weeks but can not
take an outage of the zone.
you can add zfs filesystem by temporarily
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:54:24PM -0700, Sunay Tripathi wrote:
Guys,
I think we had discussed allowing a ipkg brand zone to be installed
without a network i.e. going to a repo if I already have a installed
offline zone install is not available today. there is a bug for this
and we will have
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 02:17:45PM -0700, Sunay Tripathi wrote:
On 07/27/10 01:06 PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:54:24PM -0700, Sunay Tripathi wrote:
Guys,
I think we had discussed allowing a ipkg brand zone to be installed
without a network i.e. going to a repo
hey all,
i had a quick questions for all the zones users out there.
after you've configured and installed a zone with ip-type=shared (the
default), how often do you change the network interfaces assigned to
that zone via zonecfg(1m)? frequently? infrequently? never? only when
moving from
more information is needed about your architecture and what your trying
to do.
first off, as has been pointed out, if your not in user context
getzoneid() isn't really that useful.
second, below you keep mentioning at boot time. are you talking about
system boot time? or zone boot time? at
[ cross-posted to pkg-discuss and zones-discuss. sorry for any dups. ]
hey all,
one issue that linked images has to deal with is how specify the content
relationship between images. i've written up the proposal below
describing one way this could be done. any comments or feedback would
be
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 05:04:07PM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote:
core-os seems like it might end up being overly broad, given that, at
least at the moment, it covers the entire WOS.
actually, that is kinda the point (ie, covering the entire WOS).
one of the features of sparse zones in s10 that
hey all,
i wanted to propose zone community leadership status for the following
folks:
Frank Batschulat
Gary Pennington
John Levon
Susan Kamm-Worrell
ed
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 04:24:58AM -0700, tomwaters wrote:
Hi guys, I have set up a zone, (zone1), and when I log in all I get is the
command prompt.
How can I get a desktop inside this zone? Pls. provide simple steps or a link
to a guide.
I'd be happy to vnc in to it if required.
I
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:42:10AM -0700, Allan wrote:
Hello,
This time I decided to create a zone from scratch and see if the problem
still persists.
# zonecfg -z myzone info
zonename: myzone
zonepath: /zones/myzone
brand: ipkg
autoboot: false
bootargs:
pool:
limitpriv:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:16:58AM -0400, John D Groenveld wrote:
I have a build 129 installation with a few zones that
will not attach because I removed entire from global.
Yes, I know entire is required.
I can upgrade to 134, but I'm not sure how that will
work if my zones are detached.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 01:58:13PM -0400, Nandini Mocherla wrote:
Can anyone point me to the documentation on upgrading Opensolaris
system with non-global zones? I have a system running b130
(previously upgraded once) with 4 non-global zones, 3 zones running
b129 and 1 zone running b130.
I
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:13:48AM +, John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:36:41PM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
Please can I get people to take a look at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/
i only have one comment. is it really possible to have a zone
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:52:31PM +, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:40:36AM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/
Updated
hm. i actually think we'd be ok with just cloning running zones. we
after all, we don't shut down
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 06:10:43PM +, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:55:21AM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/
OK please reload.
zoneadm list -cip will only list zones in the installed state, but
update_zone() also check
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 06:56:39PM +, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:46:36AM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/
zoneadm list -cip will only list zones in the installed state, but
That's not true:
r...@hiss:~# zoneadm
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:15:16AM -0800, Kevin Prendergast wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking at document for BrandZ zones needing to know if BrandZ zones
support Redhat Enterprise 4.0/5.0. So far I only see RedHat 3.X support, but
it is an old document.
there is no official support for RHEL
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:12:21PM +, John Levon wrote:
Please can I get people to take a look at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/
BTW Ed was asking why the full refresh was needed - anyone?
that's not entirely true. ;)
the full refresh is needed because we may not have
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:12:21PM +, John Levon wrote:
Please can I get people to take a look at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/
i only have one comment. is it really possible to have a zone running
within an alternate BE? i didn't think it was.
ed
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:14:48PM -0800, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello
I'm creating a zone and after install, copying a sysidcfg.
On zone boot and zlogin -C I still run into the prompts.
My sysidcfg is :
keyboard=French
system_locale=en_US.UTF-8
terminal=xterms
network_interface=primary {
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 10:30:18AM +0100, dick hoogendijk wrote:
Going from OpenSolaris b131 to b132..
Am I correct in this procedure:
[1] pkg image-update (with zones attached)
[2] after reboot to the new BE detach the zones
[3] zoneadm attach -u zones
OR, do I have to detach -BEFORE- the
i've never tried this, but i'd recommend figuring out if gdm can be run
as an xdmcp server.
optionally, you could also run Xvnc within the zone.
or you could ssh -X to the zone and remote display your apps.
if you're tring to run gdm in the zone to access local hardware
(graphics card,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:51:27PM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Ed,
Thanks for reviewing this, my responses are inline.
On 01/15/10 19:26, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:18:20AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
I need a code review for my proposed fix for:
6887823 brandz
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:33:15PM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
On 01/19/10 14:00, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
perhaps it would make sense to add some tokens to the comments in
brand_asm.h like:
32-BIT INTERPOSITION STACK
32-BIT LCALL/INT STACK
64-BIT INTERPOSITION STACK
64
this sounds like a bug that dan price tracked down to:
6906514 sdev_attrinit ignores va_mask, leading to whacky /dev/zcons vattrs
it should be fixed in snv_130.
ed
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:56:20AM -0800, Eugene Turkulevich wrote:
I have two zones configured and run: ipkg zone (shared ip) and
lgtm.
ed
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 05:41:29PM -0800, Jordan Vaughan wrote:
That's a good idea. I updated the webrev.
Thanks,
Jordan
On 12/21/09 05:08 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
Minor nit. You could use != POC_STRING, put the Z_NO_ENTRY in the {}, and
put the success case after. Not a
i'd probably leave out the XXX comment and instead update 6912451 to
mention that part of the fix for 6912451 would involve removing the fix
for 6909222 (since it would essentially be obsoleting this fix.)
ed
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 03:46:00PM -0800, Jordan Vaughan wrote:
I need someone to
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 08:19:02AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Because its not right above, all of the other register values are
also pushed on the stack, so we need to go through the SSP to get
to the right spot. I can add a comment explaining this but the
32bit and
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:39:34AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
- CALC_TABLE_ADDR() a little clunky. (it has seperate 32 and 64
versions, it assumes the syscall number is in eax/rax, and it has a
side effect of munging the syscall number.) how about defining just
lgtm.
ed
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 07:34:08PM +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
Hey Ed, Steve, Jordan, Jerry,
I got it in writing from Veritas Engineering that they do not have any
heartburn
over using fsck -o p on VxFS and inside the zone and also by testing in the
lab I
confirmed it
lgtm.
ed
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 07:17:50PM +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
May I have 2 code reviewers for:
6911329 Incorrect code in kstat_delete causes panic
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~batschul/onnvkstat/
Description
A colleague was looking into a crash and the reason turned
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 04:24:22PM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
to be:
---8---
/*
* The saved stack pointer (V_SSP) points to the interrupt specific
* state, which is saved directly above the stack contents common to all
* callbacks.
...
*/
#define V_U_SS
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:46:57AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Ed,
I've posted an updated webrev to address your comments.
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.6768950/
usr/src/uts/intel/brand/sn1/sn1_brand_asm.s
- i'd think the is 0 = syscall = MAX check would have to be
done
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:37:36PM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Ed,
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:46:57AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Ed,
I've posted an updated webrev to address your comments.
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.6768950/
usr/src/uts
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 01:28:01PM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Ed,
Thanks for reviewing this. My responses to your comments are
in-line.
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 08:39:12AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
I have an initial code review for the fix for bug:
6768950
so just one question.
the '-p' preen option is only documented in the fsck_ufs(1m) man page,
and not in fsck(1m). so i'm wondering is are there zones which may be
installed on other filesystems which supply an fsck utility which may
not support the preen option? (or perhas '-p is defined as
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 02:54:05PM -0800, Jordan Vaughan wrote:
I need someone to review my fix for
6882732 unpacking archive with extended file attributes reports errors
The webrev is accessible via
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-s10c
lgtm.
ed
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:31:55AM -0800, xx wrote:
i'm still not doing something right:
init...@dogpatch:~# pkg install SUNWs10brand
Creating Plan
pkg: The following pattern(s) did not match any packages in the current
catalog.
Try relaxing the pattern, refreshing and/or examining the
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:12:33AM -0800, Frank Batschulat wrote:
Hey Ed, I want to comment on the NFS aspects involed here,
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
well, it all depends on what nfs shares are actually being exported.
I definitively think we do want
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 02:47:37PM -0800, Frank Batschulat wrote:
Hey Ed, addition to my previous posting as I just noticed something I've
totally
forgotten about
afaik, determining the mount point should be pretty
strait forward. i was planning to get a list of all the shares
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:52:24PM -0800, Daniel Dinu wrote:
Hello,
Yes - /zone1 is a separate filesystem.
r...@server.com#zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
rpool 12.7G 216G81K /rpool
rpool/ROOT5.30G 216G19K
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:12:48PM -0800, Dan Price wrote:
On Thu 19 Nov 2009 at 09:16PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey all,
i need a review for the following bugfix:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount3/
6901952 zoneadm fails with unable to determine default brand
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:16:45PM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey all,
i need a review for the following bugfix:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount3/
6901952 zoneadm fails with unable to determine default brand
thanks for all the reviews.
also, for the morbidly curious, i
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:22:56AM -0800, nikolay wrote:
I have a workstation with Solaris 10 pre-installed. Also I have CD's set with
Solaris 9 distribution. How can I make a solaris 9 zone with 'naked' solaris
9 OS not having prepared OS image?
you can't. you can only install an s9
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 02:48:56PM -0500, David Pipes wrote:
I've been told there is a demo environment in the Solaris 8 container
download,
I suspect it's time-limited or something. Maybe the Solaris 9 container
it is not time limited.
there is no drm or licensing enforcement
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 06:26:06AM -0800, Daniel Dinu wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm new to opensolaris; I installed opensolaris a few days ago and tried to
create a new zone, but installation failed.
Here's what I've done:
# uname -a
SunOS server.com 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
#
hey all,
i need a review for the following bugfix:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount3/
6901952 zoneadm fails with unable to determine default brand
thanks
ed
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
hey all,
i've got a webrev that needs review:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/pkg-on-nightly/
it's a fix for:
11392 'zoneadm .. install' only uses preferred publisher
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=11392
this fix let's me install zones on systems that
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 08:59:15AM +0100, casper@sun.com wrote:
On Tue 27 Oct 2009 at 10:58AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey all,
i have an updated webrev for my previous fix:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount/
6889379 zoneadm mount fails on opensolaris
6894901 zoneadmd
hey all,
i have an updated webrev for my previous fix:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount/
6889379 zoneadm mount fails on opensolaris
6894901 zoneadmd can hang if fdetach() return EBUSY
you'll notice i added 6894901 to the fix. i hit this issue while doing
regression testing with the
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 05:07:08PM -0700, Dan Price wrote:
On Tue 27 Oct 2009 at 10:58AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey all,
i have an updated webrev for my previous fix:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount/
6889379 zoneadm mount fails on opensolaris
6894901 zoneadmd can hang
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:27:10PM -0700, Dan Price wrote:
On Tue 27 Oct 2009 at 07:03PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
the assumption is that we will never get stuck in this forever. if we
do then this fix is broken and we need to redesign the exit mechanism.
(i was debating just calling
/head/libzonecfg.h
This isn't critical, but shouldn't zonecfg_default_brand() be declared
somewhere other than the group of privilege-related functions? Perhaps
it should go under higher-level routines.
Other than that, this looks good to me.
Thanks,
Jordan
On 10/16/09 05:12 PM, Edward
hey all,
so it seems that in opensolaris b120 i broke scratch zones with the
following fix:
9392 native zones should fail to install on opensolaris
so now i've got a fix for that breakage:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount/
6889379 zoneadm mount fails on
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:47:40AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Ed,
Thanks for reviewing this again. I took most of your
input. For the questions you had or the things I
didn't take, I have responded below.
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
- could you propegate back your common changes
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:15:23PM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Ed,
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:47:40AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Ed,
Thanks for reviewing this again. I took most of your
input. For the questions you had or the things I
didn't take, I have
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:18:21PM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Peter Memishian wrote:
also, i would have though you'd commited to doing this work when you
decided to fork the sn1 brand code instead of making it common.
I was wondering about this too. Indeed, there seems be a sizeable
i've finished looking through the rest of the files and my comments are
attached.
ed
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:09:26PM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
- also, since the s10 brand is derived from the sn1 brand, could you
please ensure that all the new s10 brand
i'm not done yet, but i've attached what i've got so far.
ed
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:09:26PM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
- also, since the s10 brand is derived from the sn1 brand, could you
please ensure that all the new s10 brand that are being created are
derived
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 03:06:00PM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey jerry,
do you have an updated ws+webrev where the s10 files were created using
hg cp? (i'm waiting for that before doing a review.)
also, when were you planning to integrate? (so i can avoid a last
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:25:30PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:33:11PM -0700, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
there by implying that the vdisk path is a directory. ok. that's easy
Right.
enough to detect.
It's probably safer to directly use vdiskadm to sniff
two high level comments to start with.
- since the s10 brand is derived from the sn1 brand, are there any
framework changes which were made to the s10 brand that should be
backported to the sn1 brand?
- also, since the s10 brand is derived from the sn1 brand, could you
please ensure that all the
thanks for taking the time to look at this and sorry for the delay in
replying. my comments are line below.
ed
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 11:13:07PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 04:55:15PM +0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
File storage objects:
path:///file-absolute
hey illya,
thanks for reviewing this and sorry for the delay in replying.
my comments are inline below.
i've also attached a document that contains some of the design doc
sections i've revised based of your (and john's) feedback. since the
document is large, i've only included sections that
hey all,
just a quick heads up.
it's been on my todo list for a very long time (and i figured that i
really should get it done before the xwiki migration), so i finally
merged all the brandz community content into the zones community. you
can see all the moved content here:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:35:07AM -0700, RAjiv Patel wrote:
I have created a zone , namely ems-ora-zoneB. Then to install the zone , I
executed the following command.
zoneadm -z ems-ora-zoneB install
It has been more than 40 hours, but the prompt still shows Initializing
zone product
you need three commands:
zonecfg(1m)
zoneadm(1m)
zlogin(1)
to configuration a zone, see example 1 in zonecfg(1m). the only required
parameter is zonepath, so in the simplist case (a zone with no
networking) just set that.
then use zoneadm(1m) to install and boot the
hey illya,
i posted the latest version to our aliases in may after i incorporated
mike's feedback, but digging throught the archives i couldn't find any
decent readable copy. hence i've gone ahead and posted the latest
version to zones community site here:
are you running opensolaris?
if so, i'm guessing that the problem is the format of the hashed
password. by default, solaris version = 10 and nevada use crypt for
hashing passwords, but opensolaris uses SHA256. these settings seem to
be controlled via /etc/security/policy.conf. just search for
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:28:21AM -0700, Alastair Neil wrote:
I am trying to set up two zones to exactly duplicate a production server one
for test and one for development. The production server has a number of
zpools which are specifically named and the scripts we are testing expect
this
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:41:36AM -0700, Brian Leonard wrote:
I've been struggling to use the sysidcfg file to preconfigure my zones in
2009.06. I've read a couple of other posts where folks have also struggled
(http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=307290,
hey all,
i need a code review for:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-headers1/
6851400 SUNWzoneint files should be moved to SUNWzoneu
i'm eliminating the SUNWzoneint package because there really is no good
reason not to ship these header files and lint libraries. they are
already needed for
message from David Edmondson d...@sun.com -
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:21:20 +0100
From: David Edmondson d...@sun.com
To: Edward Pilatowicz edward.pilatow...@sun.com
Cc: Fajar A. Nugraha fa...@fajar.net, xen-disc...@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: snv domU + zones ?
* edward.pilatow...@sun.com
- you might want to add the crypto libraries to the list of libraries
to watch for breakage. ;)
- to improve the readability of crypto_ioctl(), could you make a
dedicated function or macro that just does translation between
the s10 and nevada versions of crypto_get_function_list_t?
- when
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:54:46AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Ed,
Thanks for reviewing this.
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
- you might want to add the crypto libraries to the list of libraries
to watch for breakage. ;)
Yep. :-) I'm also going to try to see if any of the other default
hey all,
could i get a code review for this two line change:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-bugs1/
6850112 zonecfg verify should verify the native brand type
thanks
ed
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:46:29PM -0700, Dan Price wrote:
On Mon 15 Jun 2009 at 03:42PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey all,
could i get a code review for this two line change:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-bugs1/
6850112 zonecfg verify should verify the native brand type
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 02:25:16PM -0700, Ian wrote:
this error seems to indicate that the zone state in
/etc/zones/index is
invalid. (normally people shouldn't edit this file
for exactly this
reason. ;) what are the contents of this file?
I've attached the full file to this
hm. detach is failing because attach never marked any zone dataset as
active. could you file a bug against detach to make it more robust in
the face of failiures?
to work around this problem you might just want to edit /etc/zones/index
and change the zone state to uninstalled. (this will
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 01:50:16PM -0700, Ian wrote:
once you've changed the state to uninstalled, you
don't need to do a
detach. just do:
zoneadm -z lt;zonegt; attach -u -d lt;zbe_datasetgt;
Unfortunately, it doesn't like that either:
# zoneadm -z web attach -u -d
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:39:12AM +0200, Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
Le 5 juin 09 à 04:45, Edward Pilatowicz a écrit :
The difference between Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris is that, on
Solaris 10 by using the create would automatically inherit all the
4 directories mentioned above, and by using
hey kevin,
this is a known issue that is being fixed. (i thought the fix had
already been pushed to the public repo, but i guess it hasn't happened
yet.)
there is a pretty straitforward workaround. do a pkg image-update, boot
to the new image, and then your zone install should work.
ed
On
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:07:36PM -0700, Kevin Pan wrote:
I don't understand your statement that OpenSolaris 2009.06 does not support
sparse zone. I would appreciate if you could clarify what you meant by We
don't have sparse zones in 2009.06...
I thought by using the commands add
include the revised
proposal.
thanks again,
ed
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:59:22AM -0500, Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Edward Pilatowicz
edward.pilatow...@sun.com wrote:
hey all,
i've created a proposal for my vision of how zones hosted on shared
storage should work
[ third reply, includes revised proposal + change bars from previous
version ]
hey mike,
thanks for all the great feedback.
my replies to your individual comments are inline below.
i've updated my proposal to include your feedback, but i'm unable to
attach it to this reply because of mail
comments inline below.
ed
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:26:06AM -0500, Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Edward Pilatowicz
edward.pilatow...@sun.com wrote:
i've attached an updated version of the proposal (v1.1) which addresses
your feedback. (i've also attached a second
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:33:57AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
solarg wrote:
hello all,
i'm wondering how to create a sparse zone in os2008.11:
Sparse zones are not currently supported on opensolaris.
This is tracked as:
2550 Support for sparse root zones
- in solaris 10, just use create
+1
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:02:40AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
I would like to propose a project to be sponsored by
the zones community. This project would create a
solaris10 branded zone for use on OpenSolaris.
We will use the BrandZ infrastructure to deliver a
solaris10 brand. This
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 03:01:25PM -0800, Dan Price wrote:
...
hey dan,
thanks for doing this.
+1 on the merger of the two communities.
i also accept my core contributor nomination.
ed
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
it depends on your requirements.
since you haven't specified any, i'll just say that i prefer using zfs
over ufs. hence i'd just recommend adding a zfs dataset via zonecfg.
ed
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:44:09PM +1100, Anthony Yeung wrote:
There are a number of ways to mount storage from the
well, certainly you could remove packages, but why bother.
disk space is cheap.
ed
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:20:31PM +0100, Bernd Schemmer wrote:
Hi,
we successfully installed some Solaris 8 zones and I'm wondering if I
should delete some of the not necessary packages from the Solaris 8
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
