Ben Rockwood wrote:
One issue I did smack into that I don't fully understand yet is the
syseventd service failing within the zone. I'm still trying to hash out
how to solve that.
Sorry, I sent a pointer to the wrong webrev. It
should be:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.6793/
Ben Rockwood wrote:
So I'm perplexed how this service could wind up in the zone-- unless the
variant isn't getting set properly in the image? Or perhaps the mixing
of a very new version of SUNWipkg with older repository contents is causing
this to not work right... I'm not certain.
Stated
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
I have wondered whether there is an RFE for an interface to zonecfg or
probably more likely zoneadm, to apply these changes now automatically,
instead of having to know all the OS commands (ifconfig addif, mount -F
lofi, rcapadm, prctl, etc.).
6212241 RFE: ability to
Dan Price wrote:
...
Dan,
Thanks for doing all of the work to put this together.
+1 from me. Also, +1 on Glen Faden as a core contributor.
Jerry
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
FYI,
An ARC case was recently submitted for a
new rctl related to limiting process slots
consumed by zones. The case is here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2009/042/
in case anyone is interested in reading it.
Jerry
___
Geoff Shipman wrote:
Jerry,
I received update they did not use a force option to the attach just the
-u. They noted that no log file was created in the
/var/sadm/system/logs directory of the NGZ.
This attach was stymied originally by a Veritas package VRTSat that had
patch 117499-02
Geoff Shipman wrote:
Hello All,
I attached a NGZ that was from an alternate system to a Update 6 system
using the -u option. The NGZ is sparse but I don't think a whole root
would behave much differently. The update worked and the NGZ was
attached but I noted that the kernel revision via
Geoff Shipman wrote:
Jerry,
Thanks for the update on the /etc/release file. The customer is more
concerned regarding the kernel patch info not listed in the NGZ.
From uname output in the NGZ we can see the kernel matches the global
value. Its the lack of showrev -p data for that kernel
Christine Tran wrote:
I am running into this:
https://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=79673
r...@ender:/# zoneadm -z web boot
zone 'web': Error: error mounting zone root dataset.
zone 'web':
zoneadm: zone 'web': call to zoneadmd failed
When I go to check the CR, there's
Christine Tran wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Jerry Jelinek gerald.jeli...@sun.com wrote:
You haven't provided much information so its hard
to help you. What build are you running? The
issue described in the thread you reference should
be fixed in the OpenSolaris 2008.11 release
Assuming that the zonepath for your zone
is /zones/web, then the problem is that it
looks like the dataset was not umounted when
you shut down the zone.
Christine Tran wrote:
What is the output of 'mount -p' and 'zfs list' on this
system?
r...@ender:/# mount -p
rpool/ROOT/opensolaris - /
Bernd Schemmer wrote:
Ed,
well, certainly you could remove packages, but why bother.
disk space is cheap.
Not SAN ... but I don't care about the diskspace -- I was only thinking
it might be useful/recommended to do so.
The vx* pkgs probably can be removed without a problem.
I wouldn't
Roland,
Thanks for looking at this. I'll take a look
at each of your recommendations. One factor
is that we plan on backporting this to S10, so
I want to keep things working on that release
with a minimum of changes.
Thanks again,
Jerry
___
Mike,
Thanks for reviewing this and sending your comments.
I'll make the changes to use mktemp. Responses to
your other comments are in-line.
Mike Gerdts wrote:
/usr/src/lib/brand/native/zone/image_install.ksh
290 typeset line=$(grep files_compressed_method $ident)
301
Fredrich Maney wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Edward Pilatowicz
edward.pilatow...@sun.com wrote:
well, certainly you could remove packages, but why bother.
disk space is cheap.
ed
For the same reasons that you don't install unneeded packages in the
first place: security,
I have a first cut at p2v for native zones.
This is:
6667924 physical to virtual utility for native zones
PSARC 2008/766 native zones p2v
There is a webrev at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.p2v/
I already have some comments from Ed and I'll
be making a few small changes, but I'd
Pascal Fortin wrote:
Hi all,
I guess the answer is no but i want to have your opinion on this stuff. Is
there
a way to guarantee a minimum amount of memory for the global zone? This is to
prevent all memory being catched by other zones and eventually you can't do
anything to free this
Pascal Fortin wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Thanks for your response. This is not overprovisioned system but you can have
a
bug somewhere that lead to use all memory and, of course, you have to correct
it. But all other zones in the system will suffer from this situation and in
consolidation
Pascal Fortin wrote:
If you have a system with a fixed number of zones, you can distribute the
total
amount of memory to the zones except what you want to reserve. If you don't
know
how many zones you will have or on which system your zone will be run, you
can't
easily manage how many
Zoltan Farkas wrote:
When attempting to boot them I get:
This was discussed here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=80209tstart=75
I also blogged about this here:
http://blogs.sun.com/jerrysblog/entry/zones_on_opensolaris_2008_11
Jerry
David Smith wrote:
I have about a dozen zones on a system. During the creation of some of the
early zones, I was wondering why my sparse zones were so large. I found out
that the /opt area was being copied, so
I updated the default template to make /opt an inherited directory for the
Bernd Finger wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to create a sysidcfg file to completely avoid configuration
screens when booting a newly created zone.
I found that with OpenSolaris 2008.11, I have to mount a zone, create
the /etc/sysidcfg file under the zone's root directory and then unmount
the
Attached is a proposal for native-brand zone p2v that
I am planning to submit for ARC review soon. I'd like
to hear any comments about this.
Thanks,
Jerry
---
SUMMARY:
This fast-track enhances the Solaris Zones [1] subsystem to address an
existing RFE [2] requesting a physical to
Bill Walker wrote:
Tjere are some SMF services known to break when moving into a zone from
a physical server. Things like sysevent, FMA-ish stuff, ldom manager,
etc. (I don't have my notes in front of me, but I seem to remember
around 4-5 from a SUNWall vanilla installation). Mostly
Mike,
Mike Gerdts wrote:
The image modifications fall into the following areas:
1) SMF services that are not usable within a zone should be deleted or
disabled as necessary (for S8 and S9 we dealt with rc scripts
instead).
This implies that the source system can be S8, S9,
Nico,
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 10:14:26AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Yes, not everything that runs in the global zone works in a
non-global zone. NFS serving or non-global zones are the most obvious
examples.
For SMF services, the services to be deleted
James,
James Carlson wrote:
Jerry Jelinek writes:
Mike Gerdts wrote:
This implies that the source system can be S8, S9, or S10. I don't
see anywhere else in the proposal that explicitly states that S8 and
S9 can be attached and upgraded, so I suspect I am reading my wishes
into your words
James,
James Carlson wrote:
Jerry Jelinek writes:
James Carlson wrote:
Update on attach just means apply saved patches, if any are
needed, right?
Not really. We see what pkgs are out of sync, either because of the
pkg version of because of patches applied to those pkgs, then we do
Mike,
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:37 PM, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think answering that would answer the previous poster's question
about the difference between doing an upgrade before flar creation and
just importing a flar from S9: the former results in a
James,
James Carlson wrote:
Jerry Jelinek writes:
We can handle 'update on attach' from s10 to nv, although nv isn't an
official release yet and something might happen which breaks this (maybe
IPS?). We don't support 'update on attach' of s8 or s9, although I have
played
around
James,
James Carlson wrote:
Presumably, as a non-native zone, if such a thing existed, it would be
expected to result in no upgrade-on-attach behavior. Right?
Right, although the behavior is really dictated by the brand
definition, so some sort of behavior could be defined for
zone
Christophe Dupre wrote:
Hello,
we're having an issue migrating a zone from one server to another.
Server A has Solaris 10 x86 05/08 and hosts zone X (spare-root zone).
Server B has just been acquired and installed with Solaris 10 x86 10/08
and hosts a number of zones created locally.
Christophe Dupre wrote:
Thanks Jerry for the quick reply. I am making progress, but no cigar
(yet). Now I have:
zoneadm: zone 'X': ERROR: attempt to downgrade package SUNWgtar, the
source had patches but this system does not
It does not give me a patch number, so I can't add it to the
Henrik Johansson wrote:
The easiest way would probably be to identify packages that are not to
be updated, in my experience packages do not differ that much between
local zones in production environments, but that is only based on the
system I have worked with. I always keep zones as
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Jerry Jelinek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henrik Johansson wrote:
The easiest way would probably be to identify packages that are not to
be updated, in my experience packages do not differ that much between
local zones in production environments
Henrik Johansson wrote:
Hi all,
Some thoughts regarding update on attach, and why I don't think it
will be as useful as it could be. Perhaps Jerry or someone could
enlighten me or give me some feedback.
This mainly applies to whole root zones, since they do not have any
inherited
Luca Morettoni wrote:
On 10/22/08 17:53, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Since there have been several questions about using
zones on recent opensolaris builds (98 and later)
I thought I would try to summarize what to do.
First, all of this is discussed in gory detail in
the spec if you need more info
Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
Le 22 oct. 08 à 18:22, Jerry Jelinek a écrit :
Zoram Thanga wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
3) Zones are only supported in ZFS. This means that the zonepath
must be a dataset. For example, if the zonepath for your
zone is /export/zones/foo
Since there have been several questions about using
zones on recent opensolaris builds (98 and later)
I thought I would try to summarize what to do.
First, all of this is discussed in gory detail in
the spec if you need more info:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=273528;
1)
Zoram Thanga wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
3) Zones are only supported in ZFS. This means that the zonepath
must be a dataset. For example, if the zonepath for your
zone is /export/zones/foo, then /export/zones must be a dataset.
The zones code will then create
Tamer Embaby wrote:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
5. Can somebody clarify me whether ZFS is supported for containers?
Since ZFS has the concept of creating pool of devices first and on top
of that file systems can be created. I would like to know what kind of
support is there today for ZFS
Menno Lageman wrote:
OpenSolaris 2008.05 has introduced a new zone brand, ipkg, which is
different from the native zones in Solaris 10. (I'm not familiar with
Zone Manager, so I don't know if it supports ipkg zones.)
2) Since I don't have any inherit_pkg_dir entries when I use the -t s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking about global zones /etc/vfstab. Using zones fs
configuration if I want to remount (using other options) it in the middle of
the day
I would have to reboot the zone. Using only /etc/fstab (from global
zone) I just run -o remount, ... option.
Using the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:55:53PM +0100, Lewis Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 09:04 -0400, Jeff Victor wrote:
The zonecfg man page has an example of the use of fs options:
zonecfg:myzone3 add fs
zonecfg:myzone3:fs set dir=/usr/local
Lewis Thompson wrote:
Hi,
I have a simple zone configured to test the VxFS 'convosync=direct'
option. It's an s10u5 machine with no additional patches:
zonecfg:lt203398:fs info
fs:
dir: /foo
special: /dev/lofi/1
raw:
Ed,
Thanks for taking the time to go through this. I have
a few responses to your comments in-line.
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey jerry,
nice proposal.
sorry i didn't reply to this earlier, i managed to miss it last
week. :(
some comments are below.
- you proposed:
The
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Currently, with user defined properties, the values can be changed
inside the zone. The proposal actually depends on this feature.
It sounds like you might need to talk to the zfs team about some
enhancements here so we can have properties
Ethan Quach wrote:
Hey Jerry,
I just thought about something regarding the zones dataset
namespace. Instead of creating the dataset for zone roots at:
rpool/export/zones/z1/rpool/ZBE1
Maybe we should insert the roped off ROOT container dataset
like we do in the global zone:
Ethan Quach wrote:
Ethan Quach wrote:
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Evan Layton wrote:
This is the same as what is done with /rpool/ROOT and ZFS boot, with
ROOT being the confined area where we place BE's. An admin can still
create things there but this is the only place that we look
Steve,
Thanks for looking this over, responses in-line.
Steve Lawrence wrote:
During the zone installation and after the zone is installed, the zone's ZBE1
dataset is explicitly mounted by the global zone onto the zone root (note,
the
dataset is a ZFS legacy mount so zones infrastructure
Glenn,
Glenn Faden wrote:
Jerry,
For Trusted Extensions in OpenSolaris, we plan to use a new labeled
brand for zones which will be derived from the new ipkg brand. So your
proposal also affects labeled branded zones. I would like to explore
the plan to delegate these datasets to the
Apologies for any duplicates you might receive. This
was sent to caiman-discuss, but for those who don't follow
that list, I wanted to send this out here.
Thanks,
Jerry
Zones/SNAP Design
8/25/2008
I. Overview
This specification describes how ZFS datasets will be used with zones for
Jordan Brown wrote:
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Jordan Brown wrote:
bart(1M) says about its -R option:
Note - The root file system of any non-global zones
must not be referenced with the -R option. Doing
so might damage the global zone's file
Lori Alt wrote:
Anybody know how to get zoneadm clone to use
zfs cloning? I've got a zone (z1) whose root is a zfs dataset.
I configure a new zone (z2) and try to make z2 a clone of z1:
# zoneadm -z z2 clone z1
This works, but the clone is constructed by copying z1, not
by doing a zfs
Glenn Brunette wrote:
My apologies if this is a RTFM moment, but I have been looking and have
been unable to find an answer. If memory caps are defined for a given
zone, why doesn't the output of swap display the cap?
6572077 size of swapfs filesystems in a zone should reflect zone.max-swap
robert s lee wrote:
Can I get more info on 6576592 RFE?
I read that it should work between 4u/4v. I am interested in any
caveats and requirements for attach/detach among 4u an 4v.
Robert,
What information do you need? There are no specific
issues moving between 4u/4v.
Jerry
Mike,
Mike Gerdts wrote:
Why take this approach rather than changing or overriding the
SUNW_PKG_ALL_ZONES attribute on SUNWsolnm? It seems as though the
approach taken will make it so that the package version doesn't match
up with the release and pkgchk will complain about /etc/release in
Peter T wrote:
Hi,
is there already a workaround to only see the capped memory from within the
zone? A lot of apps check for available memory first and try to get as much
as possible. If every zone returns the total system memory, logical result
is bad performance in the zones and
Peter Tobac wrote:
Hi Jerry,
thanks for the response. Is there any news on when we will:
solve this bug?
or
have a usable workaround?
Peter,
I know this on the list of things to be looked at,
but we don't have any date yet.
Jerry
___
Henrik Johansson wrote:
Any word if we will get any of these features/fix in S10U6, it would
make life with zones quite a bit easier...
Zone update on attach (PSARC/2007/621)
Attach/dettach between sun4u and sun4v (6480464)
Vanity naming (PSARC 2006/499)
6637869 zone attach doesn't
Mike Gerdts wrote:
The only reason I would say not to use another option is to keep the
option free for other things in the future.
Mike,
Saving the option is not such a big concern. This option
would be brand-specific and as such, would not have to be
carried forward to other brands.
During testing of the zone update on attach feature
we have encountered a problem with IDRs on S10.
If you are not familiar with an IDR, it is a temporary,
one-time patch that is issued to try to solve a problem
before an official patch is released. Because these
are temporary, one-time patches,
Ed,
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey jerry,
some final comments.
ed
- could you update the sn1 brand so that it will still work?
(it's broken on x86 because of 6703962, but it should still work on sparc.)
I'll take a look at what is going on there.
usr/src/lib/libbrand/dtd/brand.dtd.1
Bob Netherton wrote:
would I be able to export and import zones from one server to another if I
have
different pkg's in local zone from what it is in global? What is the subject
to
the resrtictions of PKG_ALL_ZONES? I am not sure if I do undesrtand this
part.
The short answer is yes.
Ed,
My responses are in-line.
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 08:48:17AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
I have updated the webrev at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev/
This includes the changes for the feedback I have
received so far. I also added the zlogin.c
Steve Lawrence wrote:
Hey Jerry,
Does this address this comment in 6621020:
This appears to point out at least one bug in zlogin, namely that it
keeps stdout_pipe[1] and stderr_pipe[1] from noninteractive_login()
open when returning to the parent.
Basically, I think the filer
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
- why are you parsing arguments by hand in stead of using getopt()?
this will result in non-standard argument parsing and probably break
things that used to work like:
zoneadm -z foo clone -mcopy -sexport/zones/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
(note the lack of
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 08:48:17AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
This includes the changes for the feedback I have
received so far. I also added the zlogin.c file
to the webrev with two bug fixes. One of these was for
a bug I was hitting during testing of these changes
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 07:02:32AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
- why is there no locking around the pre-detach hook?
That hasn't changed with this code but if I recall correctly, the idea
was that predetach is not making any changes to the zone so we don't
lock until
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 07:02:32AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
- in the case of a forced attach why don't we run the brand callback?
That is really the definition of forced. We don't do anything when
forced except change the state of the zone to installed.
hm
Ed,
Responses below.
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 08:48:17AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
I have updated the webrev at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev/
This includes the changes for the feedback I have
received so far. I also added the zlogin.c file
Rodney Lindner - SCT wrote:
Hi all,
has there been any thought of a S10 branded zone running under NV.
Most of my servers run NV, but at times I need to test software that
only runs on S10. Running up a branded zone would
make my life very simple.
We have the following RFE open.
646
I have updated the webrev at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev/
This includes the changes for the feedback I have
received so far. I also added the zlogin.c file
to the webrev with two bug fixes. One of these was for
a bug I was hitting during testing of these changes
and there is a
Ed,
My responses are in-line.
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:43:27AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Thanks again for your input. I am rebuilding and retesting with
these changes. Once that is done, I'll post an updated webrev.
i couldn't wait. :)
more comments
Bernd Schemmer wrote:
Can I use Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 Containers in OpenSolaris?
I installed the packages for both but could not create a Solaris 8 or
Solaris 9 zone. zonecfg always complained about a not supported brand.
I'm running Solaris snv_89
No, this is only supported on S10u4
Ed,
Thanks for your comments. My responses are in-line.
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:59:22AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
I have posted a webrev at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev/
for bug:
6553514 native zone svr4 pkg code should be moved into zone
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
one comment to start:
- you're adding a bunch of '%*' tokens to native.xml, perhaps this is
the time to rip them out instead?
6588602 libbrand '%*' token expansion is a mess
Thanks Ed. Sure, I'll take a look at this. Its not
like this already isn't a big
Terry Smith wrote:
Hi I seem to have found a small problem with zoneadm
I have configured a zone called 2 in this case.
I have two running zones with IDs 1 and 2 as below
When I try and install the zone named 2 it seems to pick up the zone
with the instance ID of 2 instead and gives me
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zones-discuss,
Once I created a zone from s8 image some applications were not
working. It was due to ld.conf being overwritten by
/usr/lib/brand/solaris8/mods/S40_setup_preload so additional
paths we had on s8 system were gone.
Maciej Browarski wrote:
Hello,
I upgrade Solaris 10 update 3 to update 4 but I use dedicated-cpu with
live upgrade but I don't see dedicated-cpu (and capped-mem) option in
zonecfg, but man zonecfg shows this option.
Is it possibility that I must add new packages to have this functionality
William Aiken wrote:
Maciej,
Before you created a non-global zone, you created a dynamic resource
pool and associated a processor set with it. Then you created a
non-global zone and associated it with the resource pool.
Now you can create additional non-global zones and if you
Zoram Thanga wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Have you had a chance to look at this? I am still seeing the wildcard
madness on s10u5:
I really don't have anything to do with this. It
looks like it was fixed in S10u5 build 7 by the folks
who broke it. Are you running build 7? If so,
maybe it is still
Jason Bradfield wrote:
Hi,
I am still having trouble with this if anyone can help out..
Can someone explain..
From prstat -Z
SWAP 941M
RSS 844M
From df -h
/tmp 1.1G
From Suns doc http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2450/6n4o5mdis?a=view
The output of prstat *-Z* displays a
Jason Bradfield wrote:
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Jason Bradfield wrote:
Hi,
I am still having trouble with this if anyone can help out..
Can someone explain..
From prstat -Z
SWAP 941M
RSS 844M
From df -h
/tmp 1.1G
From Suns doc
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2450/6n4o5mdis
Jason Bradfield wrote:
Do you have a definition of the used column for a df -h on the /tmp. and
how does this relate to the total swap in prstat..
In my case prstat reports 942M and df reports 1.1G used on /tmp
A bug was just filed which might have an impact on
what you are seeing:
6653688
Jason Bradfield wrote:
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Jason Bradfield wrote:
Do you have a definition of the used column for a df -h on the /tmp.
and how does this relate to the total swap in prstat..
In my case prstat reports 942M and df reports 1.1G used on /tmp
A bug was just filed which might
Matty wrote:
I was looking through the zone community documentation on
opensolaris.org, but was unable to dig up a roadmap. Does anyone
happen to know if one exists? I am curious which features are planned
for 2008 and 2009.
We made an internal roadmap almost a year ago but I
don't think we
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
I have a customer who is restricting NFS access to their data. Thus,
instead of authorizing each non-global zone to be a client, would like
to authorize only the global zone, and then lofs mount the NFS-mounted
file system into the non-global zone.
This work
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Is there a stable way of determining the configuration of a running zone?
zonecfg and /etc/zones/zonename.xml show the configuration that will
be used on the next boot, so if a change was made via zonecfg, the
current running instance may be different from what
Bernd Schemmer wrote:
Hi,
(second try; my email to the list seems to got lost)
Using sloggi (http://www.roqe.org/sloggi/ http://www.roqe.org/sloggi/) I
can change the output of uname for all zones (including the global zone) from
within a zone:
global zone [Mon Dec 31 17:36:11
Christine Tran wrote:
A customer is unable to share something called the terminal server
ports to non-global zone. I don't know what these are, but here's the
description:
Serial sensor interfaces are fed to a patch panel and then received by
a digital terminal server. Terminal server
David Smith wrote:
I'm getting an error on trying to create a second zone.
-bash-3.00# zonecfg -z test123 -f test123-zone-cmd.txt
On line 7 of test123-zone-cmd.txt:
An inherit-pkg-dir resource with the dir '/lib' already exists.
resource specification incomplete
Zone test123 failed to
Gael wrote:
I had the bad surprise to find a production zone impacting a whole frame
this morning... visibly the third party application running in it as root
(no comments) generated so many processes that the whole frame was
generating a lot of cannot fork errors... impacting the other zones
Gael wrote:
On 11/9/07, Jerry Jelinek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gael wrote:
I had the bad surprise to find a production zone impacting a whole frame
this morning... visibly the third party application running in it as
root
(no comments) generated so many processes that the whole frame
Ihsan Zaghmouth wrote:
Jerry,
How the *update on attach* is planned to be deployed, patch update or next
release of solaris10 U5 ?
I am currently working on getting this done for nevada. Once it is
integrated there then we'll see what S10 update we might be able to
get into. I can
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:22:40AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
For zones update on attach we are not supporting downgrading
a zone. If you think you will want to migrate back, just leave
the original copy of the zone on the original machine and don't
boot it.
That may
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:48:12AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Although downgrading the zone might work in some cases it
really unsupportable in the general case so we have no plans
to do it.
Would it at least be possible to get a list of patches that should have
been
I have posted a webrev for the zone's update on attach
changes at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev/
This addresses the following:
PSARC 2007/621 zone update on attach
6480464 RFE: zoneadm attach should patch/update the zone to the new
hosts level
6576592 RFE: zoneadm
Pascal wrote:
bash-3.00# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 8/07 s10s_u4wos_12b SPARC
Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 16 August 2007
zonecfg
Michael Webb - Sun Microsystems wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
please respond directly to me as I am not on the alias.
I've built a number of zones for Sun Cluster deliveries so I know just
enough to get by.
I managed to zorch the /etc/zones~.xml files as well as the
101 - 200 of 289 matches
Mail list logo
