This morning's zoneadm -z search-1 attach -F and boot tripped
over a funky mount:
[Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:56:46 AM EDT] Mounting
rpool/var/zones/search-1/rpool/export at /tmp/tmp.zxa40u/export with ZFS
temporary mount
[Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:56:46 AM EDT] Mounting
In message 5022a3bf.3080...@oracle.com, Mike Gerdts writes:
Do you say race condition because you had something else (find, backups, etc.)
that was crawling /tmp at the same time? Or is there something in Solaris th
at
you are saying raced against this temporary mount? How would things be
Does attach -F ignore issues with reaching the repo?
1: Framework stall:
URL: 'http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/support/solaris/catalog/1/catalog.attrs'.
(happened 2 times)
2: Framework error: code: 28 reason: Operation too slow. Less than 1024
bytes/sec transfered the last 30 seconds
URL:
In message 20120103234407.gq24...@ultra24.us.oracle.com, Mike Gerdts writes:
- The disk is busy doing other things such that these reads from
the zone's /export/home are pretty slow to return?
I was still sending the previous night's ZFS snapshots over the WAN.
In any case, please let me
I migrated my S11x system to S11 11/11 a few weeks ago
and things have been running fine.
I'm at S11 update 2a.
However, I seem to have tripped over a bug on New Years.
My nightly backup consist of zone shutdown, detach, snapshot,
attach, boot.
On Sunday the zone's filesystem-local svc could
In message 201201031705.q03h5uwi000...@elvis.arl.psu.edu, John D Groenveld wr
ites:
My nightly backup consist of zone shutdown, detach, snapshot,
attach, boot.
Here's the output from that cron:
Progress being logged to /var/log/zones/zoneadm.20120101T021243Z.search-1.attach
Attaching
In message 20120103203031.gl24...@ultra24.us.oracle.com, Mike Gerdts writes:
Can you provide the following:
%---
zfs list -o name,mountpoint,canmount,mounted -r rpool/var/zones/search-1
# zfs list -o name,mountpoint,canmount,mounted -r rpool/var/zones/search-1
NAME
In message 201201031723.q03hnbfr001...@elvis.arl.psu.edu, John D Groenveld
writes:
Lots of evil in attach log:
[Sun Jan 1 21:11:30 EST 2012] Mounting
rpool/var/zones/search-1/rpool/export/home at /tmp/tmp.7kayqJ/export/home with
ZFS temporary mount
cannot unmount '/tmp/tmp.7kayqJ/export/home
In message 20120103220311.go24...@ultra24.us.oracle.com, Mike Gerdts writes:
It kinda sounds like something from the global zone had stepped into
some filesystems that were temporarily mounted during an attach process.
This is backed up by the evil in the attach log:
Lots of evil in attach
In message 4ee8c056.9060...@oracle.com, Enda O'Connor writes:
actually, further to Mike's reply on how to reverse dsconvert, the
message above should not have happened if zone was at update 9 level, as
update 9 has 142909-17/142910-17, are you sure the zone was at update 9
kernel?
And which
In message 4ee8ef69.6010...@ianshome.com, Ian Collins writes:
-U? There isn't a documented -U option.
URL:http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23823_01/html/816-5166/zoneadm-1m.html#scrolltoc
For native zones, zoneadm checks package and patch lev-
els on the machine to which the zone
In message 4ee8183b.2050...@ianshome.com, Ian Collins writes:
The zone originally came from a Solaris 10 update 9 system. How do I go
about patching it?
Can you v2v the zone back to an S10 system and then apply the latest
patches there?
John
groenv...@acm.org
In message 4ebb2534.80...@ianshome.com, Ian Collins writes:
I have removed all reference to them in the global zone:
# pkg publisher
PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI
solaris origin online
http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release/
IIRC I
In message 20110616022827.ga3...@mgerdts-laptop.us.oracle.com, Mike Gerdts wr
ites:
A quick look suggests that the differences between your 'pax -r' args and
what attach uses is '-@ -p e'. See install_pax() in
/usr/lib/brand/shared/common.ksh. If you update this line:
( cd $ARCHIVE_BASE
Following this recipe to migrate my non-global S10 zones to S11X:
URL:http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E19963-01/html/821-1460/gjroc.html
cpio(1) fails due = 8GB filesize limit. (See largefile(5).)
Using pax results in a zone with foobar'd permissions.
S10# pax -w -@ -p e -x xustar -f
In message 547133454.11296012653482.JavaMail.Twebapp@sf-app1, Benji writes:
I created a second VNIC, vboxzone1, inside the global zone. I added that secon
By VNIC, I meant Crossbow VNIC, not VirtualBox NIC.
In global:
# dladm create-etherstub etherstub0
# dladm create-vnic vnic0
# dladm
In message 1012850535.101293547415032.javamail.tweb...@sf-app1, Orvar Korvar
writes:
(I have also considered installing Sunray software in a local zone, but that m
eans all SunRay users are collected into one local zone. And they all run soft
I assume there's documentation for load balancing Sun
In message 1922922131.01293446116372.javamail.tweb...@sf-app1, Orvar Korvar w
rites:
BTW, My original plan does not work. I have SunRay clients, which means I can
not shutdown the global zone's NIC - because then the SunRay will stop functio
n. I must somehow separate local zones traffic, from
In message aanlkti=by3uj7pz_qns17s-py37=e_cpkvjqrzuei...@mail.gmail.com, gera
rd henry writes:
i have a sun x4150 with 4 zones (b111). I want to upgrade to b134, before
upgrading to S11express.
The process fails. As a workourand, i'm trying to move zones on another
server in b134. So i'm tryng to
In message 4d127340.5050...@ianshome.com, Ian Collins writes:
What happens if you detach the zones, upgrade and then reattach with -u?
I think he's got two problems:
his ZBEs in the detach zones aren't (un)mounted properly and
his ZBEs are clones and the snapshots are confusing the hell
out of
In message 1481154627.91285535031577.javamail.tweb...@sf-app1, Orvar Korvar w
rites:
Ok, so I shut down e1000g0 which means my global zone can not access internet.
The local zone will have e1000g0:1 which I do not shut down, which means the
local zone can access internet. Correct?
Works for me.
In message aanlkti=fhh7pknmc1vhztcgvyuofpe1fsft1j5r7r...@mail.gmail.com, Petr
Benes writes:
Hmm. VBox obviously needs to be installed in the global zone before.
Is running it in a local zone significantly safer? Yep for separating
different possible users, but it won't make running guests safer
In message 4ce45077.3080...@ianshome.com, Ian Collins writes:
zone 'test': WARNING: unable to add network interface 'rge0': link busy
zone 'test': failed to add network device: Device busy
Any ideas?
Shot in the dark, does NWAM have a hold of it?
Assuming you have console access:
# svcadm
In message 4ce57afe.9070...@ianshome.com, Ian Collins writes:
I run through the upgrade process on a system with half a dozen zones
and on restart, they all get locked into a core dump/restart loop:
Nov 19 07:57:50 i7 genunix: [ID 729207 kern.warning] WARNING: init(1M)
for zone webhost (pid
I have a build 129 installation with a few zones that
will not attach because I removed entire from global.
Yes, I know entire is required.
I can upgrade to 134, but I'm not sure how that will
work if my zones are detached.
I don't care if I can't downgrade back to 129, but I do
need to get
In message 201003231416.o2negw0f024...@elvis.arl.psu.edu, John D Groenveld wr
ites:
I have a build 129 installation with a few zones that
will not attach because I removed entire from global.
Yes, I know entire is required.
I restored /var/pkg/state/installed from my snapshot
and zfs mounted
In message 4b145e73.3080...@sun.com, Jerry Jelinek writes:
Thats not a workaround, thats what you have to do if you want to set
[snipped]
Thank you for the detailed explanation.
Work-around or not its documented here the next time someone
stumbles across the error, at least until the
In message 4b141dac.7060...@sun.com, Jerry Jelinek writes:
The workaround for what?
On snv_127, zfs receive does not mount the zbe and zoneadm attach
fails until its mounted:
# uname -v
snv_127
# zfs receive -d rpool /var/tmp/foo.snapshot
# zonecfg -z foo create -a /var/opt/zones/foo
# zfs get
28 matches
Mail list logo
