Depends on whether you want to take the zone down *now* or want the
gradual shutdown behavior of shutdown. Granted, -g0 is pretty abrupt.
Sean McGrath - Sun Microsystems Ireland wrote:
>
> surely use zoneadm halt instead of zlogin ?
>along with zoneadm list -p and grep for running zones..
Anne Moore wrote:
> All
>
> I'm trying to write a script that will shutdown all zones from the local
> zone. I'm not terribly good with scripting (yet), but thought many of
> you would be.
>
> I need to run the command "zoneadm list" and then output each line to a
> different variable to run
Anne Moore wrote:
> Okay, that's good information. I can then install it manually and things
> should work. I'll try in the morning.
You could perhaps install all of the contents of that package (plus any
other packages that are required and similarly situated), and that might
well work.
I'm pr
Jordan Brown (Sun) wrote:
> You could perhaps install all of the contents of that package (plus any
> other packages that are required and similarly situated), and that might
> well work.
... but it would of course not be a supported conf
Anne Moore wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I am talking about the Solaris Management Console. I
> have a whole-root zone and those two services are running. However, there is
> no /usr/sbin/smc in my whole-root zone. It's like the whole-root
> installation didn't even install it. Very odd.
SUNWmcc
Mike Gerdts wrote:
> Does updatemanager use patchadd -M under the covers?
No.
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Renaud Manus wrote:
> Jordan Brown wrote:
>> luupgrade -p does essentially that same set of operations.
>> lumount+pca+luumount should be OK.
>
> But we (Sun) don't support it.
True (which is why I said we'd prefer you used smpatch), but I believe
that lumount + patchadd -R + luumount *is* supp
[ Sorry if this is a repeat. I tried to abort it during the original
send and haven't gotten my own copy, so I think something went a bit
weird. ]
Renaud Manus wrote:
> Eric Ham wrote:
>> I then ran the following Live Upgrade and PCA commands with no errors.
>>
>> lumake -s sol10-2007-08 -n d2
Christine Tran wrote:
> who -r still works in a zone.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> zonename
> zone1
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> who -r
> . run-level 3 Jan 24 14:53 3 0 S
Yes, but apropos of our earlier discussion around
milestone/multi-user-server, run level 3 doesn't mean "all services
Glenn Faden wrote:
>> I understood that. What I didn't understand was why there wasn't a
>> completely separate instance of the dbus-daemon running in each zone,
>> with its own rendezvous file for communicating with clients in that
>> zone. Why would you expect there to be cross-zone communic
Glenn Faden wrote:
> I thought I answered that. The dbus-daemon is using a UNIX domain
> rendezvous file in /tmp in the global zone. The non-global zones have
> their own instances of /tmp, so the rendezvous file does not exist in
> their namespace. Even if it did, there would be other problems
>> dbus-daemon cannot be run in non-global zones
Sure sounds like the question is "why not?".
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Paul Davis wrote:
>
> Sounds like they want to access the local zone's console directly from a
> terminal server? I don't believe there is a concept of that in the zones
> model (of course, the local zone's console is normally started with
> "zlogin -C zonename" from the global zone).
Sure sou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What does the "netmasks" entry in /etc/nsswitch.conf say? A common
> issue is that a user changes their local /etc/netmasks file but their
> the switch says to use something like "nis".
Bingo! Thanks!
>> (I also tried 172.20.0.0 on the theory that maybe it wanted me t
Antonello Cruz wrote:
> I would definitely run
>
> zonecfg -z int-sagent-1-z1 info
>
> to check what the zone thinks is the netmask.
Doesn't display a netmask.
> I suspect if you haven't defined the '/24' it will pick the default for
> the address class. In this case, '/16' IIRC.
> Sometimes d
Antonello Cruz wrote:
>> zoneadm: zone 'int-sagent-1-z1': WARNING: bge0:1: no matching subnet
>> found in netmasks(4) for 172.20.46.188; using default of 255.255.0.0.
> How did you setup the IP address for that zone?
>
> Did you use, in zonecfg:
> zonecfg:int-sagent-1-z1:net> set address=172.20.4
I get:
zoneadm: zone 'int-sagent-1-z1': WARNING: bge0:1: no matching subnet
found in netmasks(4) for 172.20.46.188; using default of 255.255.0.0.
but my /etc/netmasks (on both the global and local zone) looks good:
172.20.46.0255.255.255.0
(I also tried 172.20.0.0 on the theory that maybe
17 matches
Mail list logo
