[zones-discuss] Problem with Live Upgrade 8/07 - 10/08

2009-01-02 Thread przemolicc
Hi al, I am trying to do LU on x4500: S10 8/07 - S10 10/08. I have all needed patches installed (Sunsolve doc: 72099). But while doing: luupgrade -u -n 1008 -s /mnt I get: [...] ABE boot partition backing deleted. PBE GRUB has no capability information. PBE GRUB has no versioning information. ABE

Re: [zones-discuss] Problem with Live Upgrade 8/07 - 10/08

2009-01-02 Thread przemolicc
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 01:14:12PM +0100, Nicolas Dorfsman wrote: Hi, Le 2 janv. 09 ? 12:50, przemol...@poczta.fm a écrit : ERROR: unable to mount zones: zoneadm: zone 'gimli': /usr/lib/fs/lofs/mount /tmp/.luupgrade.inf. 27317/pool/gimli

Re: [zones-discuss] vxfs setting=value style mount options

2008-09-12 Thread przemolicc
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:24:57AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was thinking about global zones /etc/vfstab. Using zones fs configuration if I want to remount (using other options) it in the middle of the day I would have to reboot the zone. Using only /etc/fstab

Re: [zones-discuss] vxfs setting=value style mount options

2008-09-11 Thread przemolicc
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 06:58:29AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:55:53PM +0100, Lewis Thompson wrote: On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 09:04 -0400, Jeff Victor wrote: The zonecfg man page has an example of the use of fs options: zonecfg:myzone3

Re: [zones-discuss] vxfs setting=value style mount options

2008-09-10 Thread przemolicc
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:55:53PM +0100, Lewis Thompson wrote: On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 09:04 -0400, Jeff Victor wrote: The zonecfg man page has an example of the use of fs options: zonecfg:myzone3 add fs zonecfg:myzone3:fs set dir=/usr/local zonecfg:myzone3:fs set

Re: [zones-discuss] vxfs setting=value style mount options

2008-09-09 Thread przemolicc
Hi, why /etc/vfstab is not right solution for you ? We use it and it just works. Regards przemol -- http://przemol.blogspot.com/ On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:03:38AM +0100, Lewis Thompson wrote: Hi, I have a simple zone configured to test the VxFS 'convosync=direct' option. It's an s10u5

Re: [zones-discuss] How to upgrade from Solaris 10 u2 to Solaris 10 u3?

2008-03-13 Thread przemolicc
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:02:54PM -0400, Anne Moore wrote: Hi All I need to upgrade my Solaris 10 u2 system to Solaris 10 u3 (in order to gain some additional ZONE functionality that u2 doesn't offer.) I've googled this and can't seem to find a 'how-to' upgrade from u2 to u3 (on a sparc

Re: [zones-discuss] exclusive-ip

2007-12-11 Thread przemolicc
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:04:02PM +, Caroline Carol wrote: Hi, I configure a local zone as exclusive-ip ## zonecfg -z zone1 . ... set ip-type=exclusive ...add net set physical=ce0 ... end But when I boot the zone, I don't see any inteface ### ifconfig -a lo0:

Re: [zones-discuss] VxFS and Local Zones

2007-11-06 Thread przemolicc
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 01:03:08PM -0700, Andrew Blatt wrote: I believe VxFS support was added in Solaris10 8/07, as you can now include type=vxfs.. Is it mentioned in any docs/FAQ ? Regards przemol -- http://przemol.blogspot.com/

Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and Dtrace

2007-07-13 Thread przemolicc
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:38:56AM -0700, Penelope Cotten wrote: Regarding new features in S10 U4: I neglected to include another new feature. The ability to use Live Upgrade on a system with zones installed is also a new feature for S10 U4. Does it work only with S10 U4 and next

[zones-discuss] Strange routing using zones

2006-10-06 Thread przemolicc
I have problem with the above topic so decided to send to both list. There is a host with Solaris 10 and installed one zone. The host has 4 NICs. Global zone [GZ] is defined/connected to one NIC (e1000g0 = g.g.g.230) and local zone [LZ] to another NIC (e1000g1 = l.l.l.110). Both are connected to

Re: [zones-discuss] zones databases

2006-08-21 Thread przemolicc
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello Brian, Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote: BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm BK told that there's not much of a difference between handing the database BK raw devices