[zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-05 Thread Eric Ham
Last Friday 2/29 I decided to try Live Upgrade on my Solaris 10 Update 4 V480 Sparc box to apply about 50 or so patches with PCA (http://www.par.univie.ac.at/solaris/pca/). # cat /etc/release Solaris 10 8/07 s10s_u4wos_12b SPARC Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, In

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-05 Thread przemolicc
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 04:44:19PM -0800, Eric Ham wrote: > Last Friday 2/29 I decided to try Live Upgrade on my Solaris 10 Update > 4 V480 Sparc box to apply about 50 or so patches with PCA > (http://www.par.univie.ac.at/solaris/pca/). > > [...] > > Perhaps someone can give me a tip of where els

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Renaud Manus
Eric Ham wrote: > > I then ran the following Live Upgrade and PCA commands with no errors. > > lumake -s sol10-2007-08 -n d2 > lumount d2 > ./pca -R /.alt.d2 --install > luumount d2 > lurename -e d2 -n sol10p-20080229 > luactivate sol10p-20080229 > init 6 > live-upgrade patching should be don

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Paul Van Der Zwan
> Last Friday 2/29 I decided to try Live Upgrade on my Solaris 10 Update > 4 V480 Sparc box to apply about 50 or so patches with PCA > (http://www.par.univie.ac.at/solaris/pca/). > > # cat /etc/release > Solaris 10 8/07 s10s_u4wos_12b SPARC > Copyright 200

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Eric Ham
> There is a document at bigadmin: > http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/sundocs/articles/sluonngzones.jsp > which describes the whole process. Also please remember that > Live Upgrade with zones requires patches mentioned in sunsolve > document: > http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Eric Ham
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Renaud Manus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Eric Ham wrote: > > > > I then ran the following Live Upgrade and PCA commands with no errors. > > > > lumake -s sol10-2007-08 -n d2 > > lumount d2 > > ./pca -R /.alt.d2 --install > > luumount d2 > > lurename -e

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Renaud Manus
Jordan Brown wrote: > Renaud Manus wrote: >> Eric Ham wrote: >>> I then ran the following Live Upgrade and PCA commands with no errors. >>> >>> lumake -s sol10-2007-08 -n d2 >>> lumount d2 >>> ./pca -R /.alt.d2 --install >>> luumount d2 >>> lurename -e d2 -n sol10p-20080229 >>> luactivate sol10p-

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Eric Ham
> Have you tried a luactivate directly after the lumake ? > There is a bug in cpio that causes lucreate to fail to create the zones in > the new be when > there is a server in the zone that uses unix domain sockets. One server I > had that caused the > problem was the admin server used for t

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Eric Ham
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Renaud Manus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jordan Brown wrote: > > Renaud Manus wrote: > >> Eric Ham wrote: > >>> I then ran the following Live Upgrade and PCA commands with no errors. > >>> > >>> lumake -s sol10-2007-08 -n d2 > >>> lumount d2 > >>> ./pca -R /

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Jordan Brown (Sun)
[ Sorry if this is a repeat. I tried to abort it during the original send and haven't gotten my own copy, so I think something went a bit weird. ] Renaud Manus wrote: > Eric Ham wrote: >> I then ran the following Live Upgrade and PCA commands with no errors. >> >> lumake -s sol10-2007-08 -n d2

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Jordan Brown (Sun)
Renaud Manus wrote: > Jordan Brown wrote: >> luupgrade -p does essentially that same set of operations. >> lumount+pca+luumount should be OK. > > But we (Sun) don't support it. True (which is why I said we'd prefer you used smpatch), but I believe that lumount + patchadd -R + luumount *is* supp

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Renaud Manus
Sorry, it's '-t' and not '-p'. -- Renaud Eric Ham wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Renaud Manus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jordan Brown wrote: >> > Renaud Manus wrote: >> >> Eric Ham wrote: >> >>> I then ran the following Live Upgrade and PCA commands with no errors. >> >>> >> >>

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Eric Ham
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Renaud Manus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, it's '-t' and not '-p'. > > -- Renaud > Ah yes, after consulting the man page on luupgrade, '-t' is what I would need. ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensol

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-07 Thread Paul Van Der Zwan
> > Have you tried a luactivate directly after the lumake ? > > There is a bug in cpio that causes lucreate to fail to create the > zones in the new be when > > there is a server in the zone that uses unix domain sockets. One > server I had that caused the > > problem was the admin server

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-04-03 Thread Eric Ham
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Paul Van Der Zwan wrote: > I only ran into it with the servers enabled at boot in the zones, disabling > the servers seems > to fix the problem. > The sockets apparently only were created when the server was running. Even > though I had > the zones halted the l