Hi all,
I'm pleased to read I'm not the sole victim of what I'm calling
"the solaris zone route bug".
Please take a look below to my comment.
Le 10 nov. 08 à 17:51, Tommy McNeely a écrit :
> On Nov 10, 2008, at 7:09 AM, Paul Kraus wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:34 PM, T
On Nov 10, 2008, at 7:09 AM, Paul Kraus wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Tommy McNeely
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The problem I ran into this time was that static routes don't seem to
>> use the same intelligence that default routes do. For example, in the
>
>
>
>At lea
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Tommy McNeely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem I ran into this time was that static routes don't seem to
> use the same intelligence that default routes do. For example, in the
At least as of 10U5 your observation is correct. I tried
getting Sun
Hello,
As I previously mentioned, I am working on the possibility of putting
zones from different security contexts (front-end, application, back-
end) into the same physical server, which is effectively putting zones
in more than one subnet. We also like to use a load balancer, at least
on
