On 7/28/06, Dan Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike, that seems odd. I'll try to followup with David about this
at our next meeting to understand why this is the case.
-dp
Thanks... I am pretty sure that it is sitting with a PTS engineer
right now. I haven't been told the bug ID on
> > The fix for bug 6395576 adds the following failure mode:
> >
> > If two interfaces are in an IPMP group and there are no global zone
> > addresses attached to the interfaces (link-based failure detection),
> > then upon a link failure and failback, a zone IP address can migrate
> > back
On Fri 28 Jul 2006 at 05:58PM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
>
> >If there is, can I expect that even in such a situation, any network
> >interfaces configured for the non-global zone (whether through zonecfg
> >or manually through ifconfig) will be removed? Or is there a possibility
> >of the network interf
On 7/28/06, Madhura Limaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to know if there can be a possibility of a non-global zone
dying abruptly, similar to a system going down due to a panic?
User error, most likely.
If there is, can I expect that even in such a situation, any network
interf
On Fri 28 Jul 2006 at 03:18PM, Madhura Limaye wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to know if there can be a possibility of a non-global zone
> dying abruptly, similar to a system going down due to a panic?
In short, no.
> If there is, can I expect that even in such a situation, any network
> interfac
On Jul 28, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Madhura Limaye wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to know if there can be a possibility of a non-global zone
dying abruptly, similar to a system going down due to a panic?
If there is, can I expect that even in such a situation, any
network interfaces configured for the no
Hello,
I wanted to know if there can be a possibility of a non-global zone
dying abruptly, similar to a system going down due to a panic?
If there is, can I expect that even in such a situation, any network
interfaces configured for the non-global zone (whether through zonecfg
or manually th
