just to be clear: i'm not a maven fan, but i'm not sure anything else is
better. buildr looks better flexibility wise, but i think maven is much
more popular and mature. with ivy we are still stuck with ant build files.
ben
Patrick Hunt wrote:
Ben, you might want to look at buildr, it recently
we do have an open issue to do this more on the fly without having to
do the bounce, but it is behind other priorities in the work queue.
This is the JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-107
in case someone would like to work on this.
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/HowT
Ben, you might want to look at buildr, it recently graduated from the
apache incubator:
http://buildr.apache.org/
"Buildr is a build system for Java applications. We wanted something
that’s simple and intuitive to use, so we only need to tell it what to
do, and it takes care of the rest. But a
You can do this today by propagating a new configuration to the new and
old servers and then restarting them. the bounce should take around a
second and to the clients it should look like a server failure and then
a reconnect. you shouldn't lose any sessions and everything should just
recover.
i'm ready to reevaluate it. i did the contrib for fatjar and it was
extremely painful! (and that was an extremely simple contrib!) we really
want to ramp up the contribs and get a bunch of recipe implementations
in, so we need something that makes it really easy. i'm not a fan of
maven (they se
Hi Anthony. We have a contrib in the current release, it's under src.
I'm not sure I understand, what is "contrib section" referring to? Or do
you mean client recipe implementations? (like ZOOKEEPER-78, which is
being worked on for 3.2)
Patrick
Anthony Urso wrote:
So does this mean no contri
