Message-
|From: Benjamin Patrick Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:35:37 -0700
|To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org
|Subject: ZooKeeper Roadmap - 3.1.0 and beyond.
|
..snip/
5) (begin) multi-tenancy support. A number of users have expressed
interest in being able to deploy ZK
/
|-Original Message-
|From: Benjamin Patrick Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:35:37 -0700
|To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org
|Subject: ZooKeeper Roadmap - 3.1.0 and beyond.
|
..snip/
5) (begin) multi-tenancy support. A number of users have expressed
interest
If someone could deploy a build to a public maven repository it would
really help zk client development and adoption when integrating with
external maven-ized projects, since adding such a dependency is
trivial in maven.
.. Adam
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Patrick Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would help new developers work with your project. Maven provides a
a broad set of tools that lots of java developers have come to expect
out of a build system. Incorporating those tools manually into an Ant
based build would be very time consuming and make the build complex to
maintain.
For
Hi Hiram,
I actually am just a user of zookeeper, I am not a member as of yet. I am
also a user of maven and ant and have been using both for many years.
So while I would say it is never a bad decision to move to maven, it isn't
always a needed decision.
A standard build structure makes sense
Fernando Padilla wrote:
So it sounds like we're in agreement ( at lease the few in this
discussion ). But have we heard from the actual developers? What are
their preferences or plans? Or would they like patches?
As I stated earlier in this thread we're planning to stay with ant for
many
