-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 13 May 2006, at 05:39, Sam Stainsby wrote:
Ah, I'd be worried whether adding the additional layer (PAM) isn't
going to slow you down.
jens
Its only an intranet web server, not a public one, so the traffic
isn't
huge. I expect that the true bottleneck will lie in communicating
with the
LDAP server over the WAN rather than the local authentication method.
I wouldn't expect that to be a problem, unless you have a really bad
connection out to the WAN or braindead firewalls that cut open
connections arbitrarily. However, if the LDAP client side is stupid
and wants to do the whole connecting/binding/asking/unbinding dance
for each and every request it might be a bit slow.
jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFEZamdRAx5nvEhZLIRAmqlAJoDunbAvwDCsch5bV3cvxGi2jjsAgCgjahG
ZPuoKIUKIJiPc8s1KJo/K3I=
=raBs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
