Log message for revision 70149:
Merged r69724:70147 from 2.10 branch to pull in recent ZTC changes.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/whitmo-2.10-layers/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/branches/whitmo-2.10-layers/doc/FAQ.txt
U Zope/branches/whitmo-2.10-layers/lib/python/OFS/Application.py
U
Log message for revision 70153:
Issue #2117: Don't choke on '+' path element in unrestrictedTraverse.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/OFS/Traversable.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt
Log message for revision 70154:
Forward-port fix for #2117 from 2.10 branch.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/OFS/Traversable.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/lib/python/OFS/Traversable.py
===
---
Hey,
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
[snip]
Thoughts?
I don't have time for a discussion right now as I'm off to Germany soon.
The one thought that strikes me is that these release management notes,
when finalized, should be in some clear, findable, well-known and
maintained location.
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I don't have time for a discussion right now as I'm off to Germany soon.
The one thought that strikes me is that these release management notes,
when finalized, should be in some clear, findable, well-known and
maintained location. Otherwise we'll forget again. I know,
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Shall we release once every 9 months from now on?
9 months pregnancy -- that's almost poetic.
/Anton
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts
Previously Anton Stonor wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Shall we release once every 9 months from now on?
9 months pregnancy -- that's almost poetic.
And painful to deliver?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux
zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7644
Blamelist:
baijum,dobe,flox,jim,jukart,philikon,poster,shh,srichter,tseaver,yusei
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7645
Blamelist:
baijum,dobe,flox,jim,jukart,philikon,poster,shh,srichter,tseaver,yusei
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-9-13 11:05 +0200:
Over the last couple of days we've been discussing Zope's new release
cycle and the release management. I would like to sum up what seems to
be the gist of those discussions:
9 month release period?
---
I am almost
Martijn Pieters wrote:
On 9/12/06, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tal:define=dummy python: somedict.update({key:value})
See, I never manipulate dictionaries in TAL and forgot you had to do
it that way. I gave the wrong answer in my reply.
That's because manipulating dictionaries in a
Mark, Jonathan (Integic) wrote:
Is there anything similar for the Zope 2.62 ZODB? I
have been using Squishdot at goodbyejim.com for years.
I still don't understand it. I would love to be able
to see everything that it dumps into the ZODB.
OK. Can I ask why you're interested?
(the answer to
David H wrote:
If necessary add
dtml-var error_tb
to your standard_error_message (if using dtml) for a clearer error
expression
This is not good advice. There are reasons why the traceback was dropped
from standard_error_message in the first place ;-)
Much better is just to look in the
Hi,
since i'm running my zeo.log at debug level in grows quite large. I've
tried to rotate the log daily by renaming the zeo.log and call
zeoctl logreopen.
./bin/zeoctl logreopen
kill(6319, 31)
signal 31 sent to process 6319
But no new zeo.log is created and all log entries still go to the
--On 13. September 2006 00:54:09 -0700 yogeen honnavar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hello AJ,
thanks for ur response. now i hv another
issue.
the problem is the older applicaiton which we hv in
zope 2.6.1 uses a function ZopeTime. after migrating
to Zope2.9.4 by moving the Data.fs
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 07:40:15PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Ethereal aka Wireshark how it is called now works perfectly for any kind
of network analysis like that. It has a functionality Follow TCP stream
and is able to decode nearly every protocol.
Oooh, that looks
--On 13. September 2006 10:00:12 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
since i'm running my zeo.log at debug level in grows quite large. I've
tried to rotate the log daily by renaming the zeo.log and call
zeoctl logreopen.
./bin/zeoctl logreopen
kill(6319, 31)
signal 31 sent
Dear users,
we hv upgraded from LDAPUserFolder version
2.2 to LDAPUF version 2.7. our current installation ov
zope is 2.9.4
now we hv a problem, in our application we hv
calls to the findUser function
findUser('pa',uid) where 'pa' is LDAP attribute
and uid is value. with
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:54:09AM -0700, yogeen honnavar wrote:
hello AJ,
thanks for ur response. now i hv another
issue.
the problem is the older applicaiton which we hv in
zope 2.6.1 uses a function ZopeTime. after migrating
to Zope2.9.4 by moving the Data.fs file. it is found
- Original Message -
From: Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Problem with upgrade from Zope 2.6.1 to Zope 2.9.4
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:54:09AM -0700, yogeen honnavar wrote:
hello AJ,
thanks
On Sep 13, 2006, at 4:00 AM, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
But no new zeo.log is created and all log entries still go to the
old file.
It looks like that wasn't implemented and just sort of stubbed out.
The method that gets called with logrotate looks like this:
def handle_sigusr2(self):
Chris Withers, the developer of Squishdot, asks:
OK. Can I ask why you're interested?
(the answer to that question will help give you more sensible answers to
your first question.)
My experience using Squishdot to run goodbyejim.com for several years has been
a positive one. I am grateful
Mark, Jonathan (Integic) wrote:
has been a positive one. I am grateful to Chris for writing it and am
glad that he has moved on to other cutting edge Zope projects.
What gives you the idea I've moved on anywhere? I still use Squishdot
heavily and deployed a new instance for a customer a
I have a new problem but it's related, so I'll keep
this thread alive.
To recap: possibly due to some network problems at my
hosting provider, my Zope would periodically stop
responding and I was unable to stop, restart or kill
it, or even restart the machine remotely. I am
operating within a
Mark, Jonathan (Integic) wrote at 2006-9-13 11:06 -0400:
...
To convert Squishdot to use an RDBMS I would have to modify the Posting and
other product scripts in Squishdot. If I could look at the Squishdot-related
objects in the ZODB I would have a better understanding of what Squishdot is
Alan wrote at 2006-9-12 18:26 +0100:
I've been trying without success to pass from a form in ZPT to an
external method an undefined list of parameters (*args).
An example:
def external_method(var_fix,*args):
return 'Vals',var_fix,args
This will not work.
ZPublisher must know the argument
yogeen honnavar wrote at 2006-9-13 00:54 -0700:
...
dtml-var ZopeTime fmt=ISO
Maybe, your ZODB object is called in the wrong way?
Errors like you describe it are a typical symptom for this case.
You might read section Calling DTML Objects in
On Sep 13, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Ken Ara wrote:
I have a new problem but it's related, so I'll keep
this thread alive.
To recap: possibly due to some network problems at my
hosting provider, my Zope would periodically stop
responding and I was unable to stop, restart or kill
it, or even restart
Chris Withers wrote:
David H wrote:
If necessary add
dtml-var error_tb
to your standard_error_message (if using dtml) for a clearer error
expression
This is not good advice. There are reasons why the traceback was
dropped from standard_error_message in the first place ;-)
When have I
Hi List,
I've been googling, maybe LocalFS is a solution, but I would like to
listen a second (or more) opinion.
I would like to have a ZPT showing images and links for files that are
not within Zope filesystem, indeed they are in my local filesystem
(they are created by an Unix program btw).
- Original Message -
From: Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:41 PM
Subject: [Zope] ZPT based on files in local filesystem folder
Hi List,
I've been googling, maybe LocalFS is a solution, but I would like to
listen a second (or more)
We currently have a ZEO environment with FileStorage (data.fs) over 100
gigs, which continues to grow. Currently we are approaching a major
hardware and software upgrade. All new hardware and moving from Zope 2.6
to Zope 2.9.
Our server hosts sites for several different schools and
- Original Message -
From: Brian Brinegar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 9:22 PM
Subject: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
We currently have a ZEO environment with FileStorage (data.fs) over 100
gigs, which continues to grow. Currently we
Jonathan wrote:
- Original Message - From: Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:41 PM
Subject: [Zope] ZPT based on files in local filesystem folder
Hi List,
I've been googling, maybe LocalFS is a solution, but I would like to
listen a
34 matches
Mail list logo
