Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Feb 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Feb 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Tue Feb 26 20:59:59 EST 2008
Christian Theune wrote:
[snip]
Here's an idea:
Let `develop` trump version pinning, but not any other constraints.
As far as I can see this would allow both of our scenarios to work or
continue to work.
I'd be happy with that too, and was really what I was aiming at, and I
think it doesn't
Hi,
Martijn Faassen schrieb:
Christian Theune wrote:
[snip]
Here's an idea:
Let `develop` trump version pinning, but not any other constraints.
As far as I can see this would allow both of our scenarios to work or
continue to work.
I'd be happy with that too, and was really what I was
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But probably the feature has been created before the name 'develop' was
chosen,
and it should have an other name ('egg_path'? 'local_egg'?).
source_egg?
--
Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting.
I want to install Zope 2.10.5 or 2.11.0-al on Mac OSX 10.5.2, which
comes pre-installed with Python 2.5.1. Install docs for both say they
don't work with 2.5.
Does that mean they don't work with anything 2.5 and above, or only
version 2.5 specifically? Has anyone been able to install either of
Hi Baiewola,
I've been using Zope on Macs a few years now.
I can tell you that Zope will work on Leopard but only with Python 2.4.4
It's not an OS X issue... Zope was built on Python 2.4.4 so it will
only work with this version of Python.
CU
Hugo
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM, baiewola
--On 27. Februar 2008 05:40:08 -0800 baiewola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to install Zope 2.10.5 or 2.11.0-al on Mac OSX 10.5.2, which
comes pre-installed with Python 2.5.1. Install docs for both say they
don't work with 2.5.
Right.
Does that mean they don't work with anything 2.5
Joerg Baach wrote at 2008-2-25 19:45 +:
...
I am trying to have a folderish object that acquires from a user object
(ldapuserfolder). It should have its own properties and contents, but
fall back to the ones of the ldap user.
I have created an object, extending Folder, and it behaves nicely
Joerg Baach wrote at 2008-2-25 22:03 +:
...
Error Type: Unauthorized
Error Value: Your user account is defined outside the context of the
object being accessed.
This is a different spelling for what I called in the last
message object not covered by the user folder identifying the current
