Re: [Zope] Mod_Rewrite port 8080

2009-04-06 Thread robert rottermann
Bobby schrieb: > Hi, > > I want to use mod_rewrite on Apache to redirect http://internal:80/internal > to http://internal:8080/internal so that when the user request > http://internal:80/internal, the Zope folder foo will be served up. I still > want http://internal:80/ to stay intact so that t

Re: [Zope] Mod_Rewrite port 8080

2009-04-06 Thread Ricardo Newbery
On Apr 6, 2009, at 10:01 AM, Bobby wrote: > > Hi, > > I want to use mod_rewrite on Apache to redirect http://internal:80/internal > to http://internal:8080/internal so that when the user request > http://internal:80/internal > , the Zope folder foo will be served up. I still want http://inter

[Zope] Mod_Rewrite port 8080

2009-04-06 Thread Bobby
Hi, I want to use mod_rewrite on Apache to redirect http://internal:80/internal to http://internal:8080/internal so that when the user request http://internal:80/internal, the Zope folder foo will be served up. I still want http://internal:80/ to stay intact so that the contents from port 80 w

Re: [Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...

2009-04-06 Thread Chris Withers
Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:34, Chris Withers wrote: >> Lennart Regebro wrote: >>> Grok and Repoze is not mutually exclusive. >> For end users who pick one or the other, they are *are* mutually exclusive >> in that the users won't necessarily know (or care) that the other ex

Re: [Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...

2009-04-06 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:34, Chris Withers wrote: > Lennart Regebro wrote: >> Grok and Repoze is not mutually exclusive. > > For end users who pick one or the other, they are *are* mutually exclusive > in that the users won't necessarily know (or care) that the other exists... I think you confus

Re: [Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...

2009-04-06 Thread Chris Withers
Lennart Regebro wrote: >>> 3. Grok moves over either to Zope.pipeline or repose.bfg as publisher in >>> Grok 2. >> Grok is Grok, Repoze is Repoze, lets leave them be and let them choose their >> own names... > > Grok and Repoze is not mutually exclusive. For end users who pick one or the other,

Re: [Zope] [Zope-dev] new www.zope.org, new dev.zope.org, old www.zope.org

2009-04-06 Thread Chris Withers
Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > There really should be not problem to integrate current > www.zope.org/Products and www.zope.org/Members including the LDAP > authentication service into an new www.zope.org. I really don't think we need to implement this if Andreas' redirect plan works out. You're