Log message for revision 111917:
Be picky, python-gettext is an optional dependency of zope.i18n, not a tool
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
===
--- Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
Log message for revision 111960:
Update Jinja2
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
===
--- Zope/trunk/versions.cfg 2010-05-04 23:02:34 UTC (rev 111959)
+++ Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 00:41, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote:
Unless I missed something, the ZTK was globally compatible with Python2.4
recently, wasn't it? Do we want the latest changes and Lennart's work to be
part of the ZTK 1.0?
I think it's OK if they are not. Of course it
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 20:02, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
- - zope.browserpage
- - zope.viewlet
- - zope.contentprovider
- - zope.deferredimport
These tests all fail because as Tres pointed out, Python 2.4 doesn't
set __file__ to the doctest filename in the globals.
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Dropping Python 2.4 supports makes most sense to me at this stage.
Zope2/Plone only support Python 2.6 for any modern version.
I don't know what BlueBream and Grok want to support, but would guess
they aim for Python 2.5 + 2.6 support. 2.4 is really old by now.
Grok
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:07, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
For a while already people have been making changes that at least break
tests on 2.4. For instance, zope.testing has some facility to pretty
print a dictionary that sorts the keys, because Python 2.4's built-in
pretty
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Should the triumvirs so decide, attached is the patch for zopetoolkit
which adopts the versions from Zope2. The normal buildout (using eggs
rather than checkouts) passes all test-ztk and test-zopeapp tests with
this
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon May 3 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Tue May 4 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 16 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 9 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct
at gocept.com.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED: Repository policy check found errors in 670
Hi,
can't see Theuni anywhere so I thought I'd do the honours - the meeting
will be on #zope in just over two-and-a-half hours.
Not sure about the Agenda but I think there is some KGS to be carried over
from last week and possibly some of the very recent ZTK discussions need
formalising
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 20:02, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
- - zope.browserpage
- - zope.viewlet
- - zope.contentprovider
- - zope.deferredimport
These tests all fail because as Tres pointed out, Python 2.4
Hi,
sorry for the lag (and thanks for Charlie to pick up the reminder today).
Here's last weeks summary.
Biggeste note: next bug day is on 2010-05-19 which is a rainy Wednesday
- a perfect day for sitting inside and smashing bugs.
Christian
--
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh
Hi,
thanks, Charlie for doing this. Would you consider being the second
person to handle the meetings (reminders, presence, and summaries)
together with me?
I'd like to adjust your agenda a little bit:
On 05/04/2010 02:24 PM, Charlie Clark wrote:
Hi,
can't see Theuni anywhere so I thought
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Dropping Python 2.4 supports makes most sense to me at this stage.
Zope2/Plone only support Python 2.6 for any modern version.
I don't know what BlueBream and Grok want to support, but would guess
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 15:31, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
The Securactive stuff seems to be offline (503s or non-resolvable
hostnames).
Hi Tres,
Sorry for that, I've stopped accidentally the builbots this morning.
--
Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com
Twitter:
On May 4, 2010, at 6:07 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
For a while already people have been making changes that at least break
tests on 2.4. For instance, zope.testing has some facility to pretty print a
dictionary that sorts the keys, because Python 2.4's built-in pretty print
module
Hi,
quite a crowd today. Must be have been drawn by my star status! ;-)
Charlie
--
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting Research
German Office
Helmholtzstr. 20
Düsseldorf
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +49-178-782-6226=
Weekly Zope developer
Am 04.05.2010, 15:12 Uhr, schrieb Christian Theune c...@gocept.com:
Hi,
thanks, Charlie for doing this. Would you consider being the second
person to handle the meetings (reminders, presence, and summaries)
together with me?
I don't mind - not hard for me to play the clueless guy asking the
Hi there,
Wouldn't it be useful to add the reports of the weekly IRC meetings to
the ZTK docs? This way we have an archive that includes some decisions
and such that's easier to go through than the mailing list archive. It
also provides a source of information that could then later be
Am 04.05.2010, 22:43 Uhr, schrieb Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com:
Hi there,
Wouldn't it be useful to add the reports of the weekly IRC meetings to
the ZTK docs? This way we have an archive that includes some decisions
and such that's easier to go through than the mailing list archive.
Charlie Clark wrote:
I think some kind of paper trail is definitely a good idea. Not sure if
docs is the right place but Christian is planning to put the reports into
the svn repository. And both location and form are less important than
having an archive*. We'll have something sorted by
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
I think some kind of paper trail is definitely a good idea. Not sure if
docs is the right place but Christian is planning to put the reports into
the svn repository. And both location and form are less
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maric Michaud wrote:
Tres Seaver a écrit :
I was surprised by the behavior of asynchronous mailing in zope 2.11.3
MailHost product. It creates a thread by instance of MailHost by the
mean of using self.absolute_url(1) as key for the
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Mon May 3 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Tue May 4 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from CMF Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Mon May 3 21:45:19 EDT 2010
URL:
23 matches
Mail list logo