Am 10.05.2011, 06:55 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com:
Constructive criticism and feedback is welcome _now_.
Hi Andreas,
along with others I'd like to thank you and the team for taking the time
to do this. The new site has a clear message and looks good - not sure if
the Zope logo
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:12, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
One thing that I think is missing on the resource page is a Products
overview - PyPI isn't really suitable for someone wanting to see whether
Zope (2) is suitable for them and despite what we now think about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
On Friday, May 13, 2011 12:12:38 PM UTC+2, Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 10.05.2011, 06:55 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com:
Constructive criticism and feedback is welcome _now_.
Hi Andreas,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[1]FAILED Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-May/040775.html
[2]FAILED Zope Buildbot / zope2.14-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64
Great, GO TEAM!
On 5/10/11 2:57 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
And just talk about 'Zope community has grown' instead of starting with
Zope Corp. and the Zope community, which I think gives the impression
the community is some kind of appendage to Zope corp, the driving force
behind it all. While
On 5/10/11 11:01 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
Please take a cup of coffee and relax.
Bah, your suggestions conflict!
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between 2011-05-12 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-05-13 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
Dear all,
edit spam across the wiki.zope.org wikis, gradually increasing over
the years, has reached multiple incidents per day, multiple days per
month. Current cleanup procedures take too much time (and are not 100%
thorough - spam remains in history) and I don't want to spend time
Please could someone tell me why AUTHENTICATED_USER was deprecated in
favour of the python security module? A quick google says because it
can be replaced..but this isn't really a good in depth explanation? If
a request was manipulated to include another AUTHENTICATED_USER,
wouldn't Zope just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/13/2011 03:36 PM, Richard Harley wrote:
Please could someone tell me why AUTHENTICATED_USER was deprecated in
favour of the python security module? A quick google says because it
can be replaced..but this isn't really a good in depth
Hmmm, I just stumbled upon some deprecation warnings in a google for
authenticated_user and that security getUser...equivalent should be used
instead.
Something like this - http://www.mail-archive.com/zope@zope.org/msg21432.html
Quoting Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com:
-BEGIN PGP
This is the summary for test reports received on the
cmf-tests list between 2011-05-12 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-05-13 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
12 matches
Mail list logo
