I've safe-upgraded and restarted the machine recently, but now it shows up:
http://buildbot.afpy.org/ztk1.0dev/waterfall
Christophe
Le 14/05/2012 03:13, Tres Seaver a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/13/2012 09:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
[6]UNKNOWN
Le 14/11/2011 01:52, Christophe Combelles a écrit :
Le 13/11/2011 14:22, Tres Seaver a écrit :
[1]FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052554.html
This is the same hour-long timeout as yesterday in the buildout step
Le 14/11/2011 23:24, Tres Seaver a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/14/2011 04:50 PM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Le 14/11/2011 01:52, Christophe Combelles a écrit :
Le 13/11/2011 14:22, Tres Seaver a écrit :
If somebody who cares about the KGS could look
Le 31/10/2011 15:31, Tres Seaver a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/31/2011 04:43 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 10/31/2011 07:21 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
These are all failures in the following zopeapp test::
-
Le 28/10/2011 19:21, Tres Seaver a écrit :
The failures here look to be due to binary incompatbility (old Python
was UCS4, new one is UCS2) in already-built eggs. Christophe, can you
please remove any 'py2.6-linux-x86_64' eggs and let them get rebuilt?
done
So, except for the
Le 26/10/2011 03:57, Tres Seaver a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Woohoo -- down to just seven!
[1]FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051688.html
This
has the sub-process buffer failure for which
Le 22/09/2010 11:49, Patrick Gerken a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:54, Marius Gedminasmar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 04:33:35PM +0200, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello Patrick,
Could you nag the buildbot maintainers to add an svn info step for
their bots?
The
Le 20/09/2010 17:19, Adam GROSZER a écrit :
Hello Christophe,
Monday, September 20, 2010, 4:53:16 PM, you wrote:
CC Le 19/09/2010 15:45, Marius Gedminas a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:58:36PM +0200, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
Le 21/09/2010 10:44, Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Christophe Combellescc...@free.fr wrote:
This buildbot uses svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zopetoolkit/branches/1.0
but in ZTK 1.0, the [source] section still points to the trunks, so it has no
effect.
We
Le 19/09/2010 15:45, Marius Gedminas a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:58:36PM +0200, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Sat Sep 18 23:09:35 EDT 2010
URL:
There are some discussions in the grok and bluebream lists about the
opportunity
to upgrade to buildout 1.5, as it will provide *isolation without virtualenv*,
so it should facilitate installations and deployments.
Is it too late for the ZTK 1.0?
Is it worth at least trying to see what it
Le 17/09/2010 16:50, Gediminas Paulauskas a écrit :
2010/9/17 Christophe Combellescc...@free.fr:
Le 14/09/2010 11:49, Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
Hi.
After the release of the ZTK 1.0c1 I also created a maintenance branch
for the ZTK 1.0. The branch can be found at:
Le 14/09/2010 11:49, Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
Hi.
After the release of the ZTK 1.0c1 I also created a maintenance branch
for the ZTK 1.0. The branch can be found at:
svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zopetoolkit/branches/1.0
just done for http://buildbot.afpy.org/ztk1.0/
btw thanks for
Le 16/09/2010 15:06, Michael Howitz a écrit :
Am 16.09.2010 um 13:33 schrieb Patrick Gerken:
I believe, nobody had yet the chance to change the configuration to
follow the branch.
that buildbot still follows the trunk.
The name is ZTK 1.0 so it should test the branch or
change its name and
Le 25/08/2010 11:18, Marius Gedminas a écrit :
FWIW I had to downgrade virtualenv back to 1.3.3, since 1.4.5 uses Distribute
by default, and zc.zope3recipes 0.6.2 doesn't like Distribute:
File
/var/lib/buildbot/eggs/zc.zope3recipes-0.6.2-py2.4.egg/zc/zope3recipes/README.txt,
line 78, in
This failure seems to be introduced by zope.testing 3.9.5, but only for python
2.6
Le 22/08/2010 13:58, Zope Tests Summarizer a écrit :
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sat Aug 21 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Sun Aug 22 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 47 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 1
Le 20/08/2010 13:58, Zope Tests Summarizer a écrit :
Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Thu Aug 19 23:30:51 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-August/018664.html
Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
I've moved the buildbots from an old 32bit to a new 64bit and
virtualization-capable server, so there is a mix of the results from the old
and
new ones.
Now the old ones are stopped.
http://buildbot.afpy.org/
I've also added the autorelease buildbot (Discover new ZTK 1.0 automatically)
Le 02/08/2010 14:00, Zope Tests Summarizer a écrit :
Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 32bit
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Sun Aug 1 23:50:36 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-August/017766.html
Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.4 Linux 32bit
I've worked on a special buildbot that would be able to create a new ZTK list
automatically, by testing arbitrary new versions. For this purpose I've created
z3c.checkversions, and the last version 0.4 has two new options (--blacklist
and
--incremental).
Le 27/07/2010 19:57, Christophe Combelles a écrit :
- lxml 2.2.7 is kept for future builds (mmh, ok it wasn't, but it should be
:( )
I've fixed it, now it does keep lxml=2.2.7, and it just chose
zope.testing=3.9.5.
The chosen package is visible in the stdio of the 1st builder
Le 24/07/2010 17:36, Adam GROSZER a écrit :
Hello Hanno,
Saturday, July 24, 2010, 3:30:53 PM, you wrote:
HS If the various buildbot maintainers have enough time and are around,
HS they could disable Python 2.7 for now and add it back once we got the
HS ZTK 1.0 branch.
done for winbot
Le 24/07/2010 03:51, Uli Fouquet a écrit :
Hi there,
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Le 14/07/2010 11:28, Baiju M a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Baiju Mmba...@zeomega.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Christophe Combellescc...@free.fr
wrote:
Le 11/07/2010 13:59, Zope
Le 14/07/2010 11:28, Baiju M a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Baiju Mmba...@zeomega.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Christophe Combellescc...@free.fr wrote:
Le 11/07/2010 13:59, Zope Tests Summarizer a écrit :
Subject: FAILED : Bluebream / Python2.4.6 32bit linux
Considering recent discussions on Python 2.7 support, should we disable the
failure reports for Python 2.7? (6 failures out of 17 in the last report)
Christophe
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Le 22/07/2010 19:30, Adam GROSZER a écrit :
Hello Christophe,
I think they should definitely STAY for trunk's, for release version
we need to clear which releases support which pythons and set builders
accordingly.
Anyway, we **should specify** what to test with the bots, I think it's
a
Le 11/07/2010 13:59, Zope Tests Summarizer a écrit :
Subject: FAILED : Bluebream / Python2.4.6 32bit linux
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Sat Jul 10 22:05:41 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-July/016427.html
Subject: FAILED : Bluebream / Python2.5.2 32bit linux
Le 06/07/2010 16:38, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman a écrit :
On 6/30/10 21:47 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
To use the ZTK release, you can use:
[buildout]
extends =
http://download.zope.org/zopetoolkit/index/1.0a1/ztk-versions.cfg
Hi,
I would like to release Bluebream 1.0b3. May I have scp access to
download.zope.org in order to upload the new version file?
regards,
Christophe
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No
Le 09/07/2010 16:50, Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
Hi.
I noticed that all three frameworks (BB, Grok, Zope2) have version
pins for Paste, PasteDeploy and PasteScript. Does anyone object to
including them into the ztk-versions.cfg under dependencies?
It's currently:
Paste = 1.7.4
Hi,
http://svn.zope.org/zopetoolkit/trunk/ztk-versions.cfg?rev=114375view=auto
is there any reason why the versions pinning of the toolchain are in the
ztk-versions.cfg ? Packages such as z3c.recipe.depgraph, mr.developer,
z3c.checkversions have nothing to do with the final frameworks nor the
Le 09/07/2010 18:44, Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
Hi.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Christophe Combellescc...@free.fr wrote:
http://svn.zope.org/zopetoolkit/trunk/ztk-versions.cfg?rev=114375view=auto
is there any reason why the versions pinning of the toolchain are in the
ztk-versions.cfg
The afpy buildbots now all run a slave with Python 2.7 final
http://buildbot.afpy.org/
Christophe
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
Le 09/07/2010 21:04, Christophe Combelles a écrit :
The afpy buildbots now all run a slave with Python 2.7 final
http://buildbot.afpy.org/
However, the 2.7 slaves don't send any alert to the zope-tests list. Should I
enable this?
Christophe
Le 12/06/2010 15:35, Tres Seaver a écrit :
Very strange. BlueBream tests pass only on Python 2.4.x, KGS 3.4.1
tests fail only on that same version. Can somebody who works with those
projects day-to-day help diagnose?
- - The BB failures appear to be due to having zope.testing missing, or
Le 16/06/2010 16:32, Christian Theune a écrit :
Me again, :)
here's the summary from yesterday:
- the first MSDN license is around, others are still waiting
- work on the windows egg builder is in progress, as is the buildbot
slave setup for the rackspace machine
- supporting Python
Le 30/05/2010 15:33, Tres Seaver a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam GROSZER wrote:
ZTS Test failures
ZTS -
ZTS Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4.1 KGS / Python2.4.6 32bit linux
ZTS From: ccomb at free.fr
ZTS Date: Sun May 30 00:29:38 EDT 2010
ZTS
Le 24/05/2010 01:34, Tres Seaver a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sat May 22 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Sun May 23 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 19 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 12 from ccomb at
The buildbots are now notifying #zope and #zope3-dev
Their nicknames are
- bbot_kgs341
- bbot_ztk10dev
- bbot_ztk10
You can discuss with them with a set of commands, with either public or private
messages. You can ask their status, force a build, etc... Example:
(16:51:00) ccomb: bbot_ztk10:
It's live again. This one tests only released packages:
http://buildbot.afpy.org/ztk1.0/waterfall
Failures :
python2.4 : zope
- zope.browserpage
- zope.viewlet
- zope.contentprovider
- zope.defferedimport
- zope.app.wsgi
python 2.5 and 2.6 :
- zope.app.wsgi
python2.7b2 :
- zope.testing
-
Le 17/05/2010 13:40, Adam GROSZER a écrit :
Hello,
It's available here:
http://download.zope.org/zope3.4/3.4.1b2/index.html
Docs and changelog should be now up to date.
Schedule is to have a 3.4.1c1 on May 21th, final 3.4.1 on May 28th.
thanks!
Below is the list of available bugfix
Le 04/05/2010 00:04, Christophe Combelles a écrit :
Vincent Fretin a écrit :
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Martijn Faassenfaas...@startifact.com
wrote:
Hi there,
Of course what applies to Hanno should apply to others making releases
of packages maintained by the Zope Toolkit project
Tres Seaver a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue May 4 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Wed May 5 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 18 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 11 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from
ct
Vincent Fretin a écrit :
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com
wrote:
Hi there,
Of course what applies to Hanno should apply to others making releases
of packages maintained by the Zope Toolkit project as well. I think the
ZTK leadership should figure out
Thanks for these suggestions. This is *exactly* what we (the ztk release team)
need.
Are there other recommendations from other people?
Martijn Faassen a écrit :
Hi there,
Because my suggestions (besides the fork issue) as a ZTK
user/contributor were scattered through the thread, here's a
Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Breakage in the following packages, but only on Python 2.4, and only in
doctests:
- - zope.browserpage
- - zope.viewlet
- - zope.contentprovider
- - zope.deferredimport
At least the first
Christophe Combelles a écrit :
Tres Seaver a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.2 Linux 32bit
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Wed Apr 28 23:00:24 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests
Tres Seaver a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.2 Linux 32bit
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Wed Apr 28 23:00:24 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-April/014174.html
Tres Seaver a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 32bit
From: ccomb at free.fr
Date: Sun Apr 25 23:13:57 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-April/014124.html
Hi!
I believe packages such as z3c.form, z3c.macro, z3c.template, z3c.pagelet (and
many others) are among the most important packages. I wonder why they are not
included in the ZTK? I always end up using them, I believe they should even be
part of the core ZTK.
If they are not part of the
Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
Hi.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote:
I believe packages such as z3c.form, z3c.macro, z3c.template, z3c.pagelet
(and
many others) are among the most important packages. I wonder why they are not
included in the ZTK? I
Here is one (only linux 32bits)
http://buildbot.afpy.org/kgs3.4.1/waterfall
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
Tres Seaver a écrit :
So far the main circularity was that everything depended on
zope.testing as a testrunner, zc.buildout for making the development
environment, and zope.testing obviously depended on zope.interface
etc. I solved that by also adding support for setuptools/distributes
Patrick Gerken a écrit :
Hi,
I wanted to look into the script that summarizes the mails sent to zope-test.
The best code I found is this
http://cvs.zope.org/Packages/TestScripts/
but I suspect that there are newer versions, I just don't know where.
I'd like modifiy the script to understand
Lennart Regebro a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:37, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote:
Depending on setuptools for tests in another evil thing. We should not
assume a
*setup* tool to be a testrunner, and we should not depend on the behaviour of
setuptools to write tests.
I'm
Christophe Combelles a écrit :
Roger a écrit :
Hi
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions
Adam GROSZER a écrit :
Hello,
There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQoutput=
html
Anyone for/against those versions
Roger a écrit :
Hi
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions
Adam GROSZER a écrit :
Hello,
There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQoutput=
html
Anyone for/against those versions?
The open questions that remain:
Adam GROSZER a écrit :
Hello,
There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQoutput=html
Anyone for/against those versions?
The open questions that remain:
* What about pytz 2010g?
* Which lxml version to take? 1.3.6?
* What
Christian Theune a écrit :
Hi,
Hi thanks for the minutes!
here's the minutes. As I've been adventurous, I'll add a few comments:
* I've started diving into the matter of how to manage items that we
park/defer/postpone/wait for and thus started using an online system.
(The only one I
Hi,
The afpy buildbots are now enough stable and I've now configured email alerts
to
the zope-tests list.
The two buildbots are :
- ZTK 1.0 dev
- BlueBream template
http://buildbot.afpy.org/
The definition of the ZTK 1.0dev is:
all the development branches of the packages in the ZTK 1.0, as
Christian Theune a écrit :
Hi everyone,
on the way towards a ZTK 1.0 release we first looked for a single
volunteer release manager who would drive the process.
As no one stepped up and no (serious) nominations were presented the
discussion went back to the drawing board and the plan
Hi,
Marius Gedminas a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:37:47PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
On 03/31/2010 12:35 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
One point for the next agenda:
As Marius also had the issue to do a KGS 3.4.1.
Mostly I wanted to know if anybody was using the KGS in production and
I've added another buildbot that runs the ZTK tests against all the package
trunks: http://buildbot.afpy.org
This should allow to detect breakages earlier (before releasing packages) on
the
different versions of Python.
The Python 3.1 slave is just there to remind us there's another task
Thanks for the summary!
The current state of nightly builds is a bit untidy. According to
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html there's four buildbot
installations with various scopes. The last two in this listing are currently
non-functional.
The third one is online
Jens Vagelpohl a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/24/10 13:08 , Baiju M wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know the legal formalities required
to accept a logo (with special font).
Also I would like to know the same for web design.
Is there any guideline for Zope
Hi,
There is no tag for z3c.sqlalchemy 1.0.11
http://svn.zope.org/z3c.sqlalchemy/tags/?rev=106375
and the latest package on PyPI is 1.0.12. No other earlier versions.
We have an application in production with z3c.sqlalchemy 1.0.11. I don't know
how the paquage we use was generated, but we
Andreas Jung a écrit :
Am 10.12.09 13:34, schrieb Christophe Combelles:
Hi,
There is no tag for z3c.sqlalchemy 1.0.11
http://svn.zope.org/z3c.sqlalchemy/tags/?rev=106375
and the latest package on PyPI is 1.0.12. No other earlier versions.
We have an application in production
Hi all !
I've finished translating Baiju's book into french (A Comprehensive Guide to
Zope Component Architecture).
The bzr branch is here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ccomb/zcadoc/book-fr
I've also generated some HTML and PDF output:
http://ccomb.gorfou.fr/static/zcadoc/zca-fr.pdf
Stephan Richter a écrit :
On Sunday 08 February 2009, Christophe Combelles wrote:
For now I only have the py2.5-64bit slave, but I have similar results,
though less tests:
http://zope3.afpy.org/buildbot/
12895 tests, 27 failures, 10 errors
I'll add other slaves soon (32bit and py2.6
For now I only have the py2.5-64bit slave, but I have similar results, though
less tests:
http://zope3.afpy.org/buildbot/
12895 tests, 27 failures, 10 errors
I'll add other slaves soon (32bit and py2.6).
Christophe
Stephan Richter a écrit :
Hi all,
I just ran all tests over night and here
Christian Theune a écrit :
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:16:38 -0800
Paul Carduner paulcardu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com
wrote:
My short-term goal is to produce a document that I can pass to new
developers with reasonable confidence that
Stephan Richter a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I have setup a KGS for Zope 3.5, so that people can test the development KGS.
http://download.zope.org/zope3.5/
I have updated all packages to the latest version available. I have not
tested
anything. I would like someone to setup a buildbot
Marius Gedminas a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:38:07PM +0300, Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/2/2 Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr:
Stephan Richter a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I have setup a KGS for Zope 3.5, so that people can test the development
KGS.
http://download.zope.org/zope3.5
Dan Korostelev a écrit :
2009/2/2 Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr:
Stephan Richter a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I have setup a KGS for Zope 3.5, so that people can test the development
KGS.
http://download.zope.org/zope3.5/
I have updated all packages to the latest version available. I
Sebastien Douche a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:55, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
I think the Zope project counts as a prominent Python project and we
have a lot of interesting code to test, so perhaps they'll let us in. :)
Would people be interested in working on making
Christian Theune a écrit :
Hi,
I've fixed a bug in zope.app.generations and added more logging. Can
someone have a look on this with a second pair of eyes and give me a go
for releasing that code as 3.4.2?
Is there something we can do for https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/241416 ?
Roger Ineichen a écrit :
Hi Christophe
Betreff: [Zope-dev] z3c.table : upcoming release
Hi,
I would like to tag and release z3c.table version 0.6.0, it
has important bugfixes, and a few new features over 0.5.0.
Please tell if someone wants to add more contributions on
this package
Hi,
I would like to tag and release z3c.table version 0.6.0, it has important
bugfixes, and a few new features over 0.5.0.
Please tell if someone wants to add more contributions on this package before I
do it. It would also be a good idea, for people using this package, to try the
trunk with
Dan Korostelev a écrit :
Hello, fellow users and developers of zope components!
I just added support for i18n in z3c.form, so it can be now translated
to many languages. If you want to contribute to z3c.form
internationalization, checkout the z3c.form.pot file from the
z3c.form's trunk and
Ok, I've just subscribed to zope-web.
Christophe
Martin Aspeli a écrit :
Hi all,
Can we please move our discussions to the standard zope-web mailing
list? This is in Gmane and I believe nabble as well as on
lists.zope.org (http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web).
Cheers,
Martin
Chris Withers a écrit :
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
and why does buildout pick it over a stable release?
Because buildout, like easy_install, will pick the newest available
version for a distribution. Fortunately, buildout has a prefer-stable
option so that you can tell it to prefer
If there are no objections, I would like to tag and release bugfix versions for:
zope.server
zope.publisher
zope.app.server
zc.zope3recipes
They will help to reduce the number of errors in the global test suite for the
Known Good Set. http://zope3.pov.lt/buildbot/
They at least help in my own
Stephan Richter a écrit :
On Sunday 17 August 2008, Christophe Combelles wrote:
If there are no objections, I would like to tag and release bugfix versions
for:
zope.server
zope.publisher
zope.app.server
zc.zope3recipes
They will help to reduce the number of errors in the global test
Jens Vagelpohl a écrit :
On Aug 15, 2008, at 02:35 , Christophe Combelles wrote:
We should also probably consider waiting a bit more for the new site
(new.zope.org) to come up, but I don't know when it will be
finished. It only
needs some content for zope2, grok, and some other pages.
I
Gary Poster a écrit :
If you use the http://download.zope.org/ppix or
http://download.zope.org/simple
indexes and try to get zope.app.authentication 3.4.3 (the newest),
you will get a 404 error.
Looking at PyPI and the zope.org index, it is evident why.
Marius Gedminas a écrit :
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 01:50:33AM +0300, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 12:57:48AM +0300, Marius Gedminas wrote:
- zope.server tests fail horribly with invalid file descriptor
errors. I cannot reproduce this error in isolation (bin/test -m
wrote:
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Is this change ok?
It seems to solve the previous failures in the 3.4 kgs, and speeds
up the test.
I don't have a problem with the change, but this damages the
usefulness of README.txt as documentation.
As someone who's never used zope3recipes, I'm going
Is this change ok?
It seems to solve the previous failures in the 3.4 kgs, and speeds up the test.
Log message for revision 89568:
Added offline=true to every test buildout to prevent unexpected (potentially
recursive) upgrade during tests
Changed:
U
Marius Gedminas a écrit :
Something seems to be wrong with zope.app.authentication 3.4.2 and
zope.app.container 3.5.5 eggs:
Test-module import failures:
Module: zope.app.authentication.tests
ValueError: line 13 of the docstring for principalfolder.txt has
inconsistent leading
I'm wondering why there are several versions of packages in
controlled-packages.cfg? Isn't the KGS supposed to point to a fixed set of
unique versions ?
I'm asking because I think it's completely impossible to test every combination
of packages:
Imagine the controlled-packages.cfg is
Marius Gedminas a écrit :
Something seems to be wrong with zope.app.authentication 3.4.2 and
zope.app.container 3.5.5 eggs:
Test-module import failures:
Module: zope.app.authentication.tests
ValueError: line 13 of the docstring for principalfolder.txt has
inconsistent leading
Philipp von Weitershausen a écrit :
Tres Seaver wrote:
Log message for revision 89399:
Pin / fix up dependencies based on comparison with monolith.
Thanks for picking this up!
I do, however, strongly object to pinning versions of dependencies in
setup.py like this. What's the point of
Martijn Faassen a écrit :
Benji York wrote:
[snip]
I also have inclinations to clean up the tests that don't fail, but have
other downsides (random confusing output to stderr, not supporting
layer teardown). I don't consider them to be release blockers, but I
think these would be nice to have
I've found another one, detected by zope.release's list-latest:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.app.externaleditor/3.4.0-r81494
But it seems hidden in pypi.
Christophe Combelles a écrit :
Hi,
could someone remove this package from the PyPI :
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.size/3.4dev
Stephan Richter a écrit :
Log message for revision 89104:
* Added latest version of zope.app.security to avoid deprecation
warnings.
* Added history file for the KGS to hopefully create better release
notes.
Did you miss the CHANGES.txt in zope.release ? We have two histories
Stephan Richter a écrit :
On Friday 01 August 2008, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Did you miss the CHANGES.txt in zope.release ? We have two histories now.
Nope, but that file tracks the package -- source code -- changes of
zope.release.
I wanted a separate file that tracks the changes
Stephan Richter a écrit :
On Friday 01 August 2008, Christophe Combelles wrote:
I wanted a separate file that tracks the changes to the
controlled-packages.cfg file.
In my understanding, there is almost no source code in 'zope.release',
since it has been moved into 'zope.kgs'. So there should
Hi,
could someone remove this package from the PyPI :
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.size/3.4dev-r73090
This is an empty development version, considered more recent by PyPI than the
latest released version 3.4.0. (which is r78211)
Christophe
___
Baiju M a écrit :
- Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added a tag for the 3.5.4 bugfix release of zope.app.container.
Could someone please add me on the owners list on pypi so that I can
upload it?
Your PyPI ID ?
ccomb
--
Baiju M
Baiju M a écrit :
- Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Baiju M a écrit :
- Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added a tag for the 3.5.4 bugfix release of
zope.app.container.
Could someone please add me on the owners list on pypi so that I
can
upload
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
