I'm using collective.recipe.patch to patch plone.recipe.zeoserver during a
buildout. The problem is that after applying the patch the py file isn't
consistently reloaded. If I look at the timestamps, I can see that the pyc
file isn't always regenerated after the patch is applied. Is there anyway to
We are currently on Zope 2.9.6 and we are working on upgrading but it isn't
going to happen anytime soon. I'm trying to use a package that is depending
on a few newer component architecture packages; zope.component,
zope.interface... Even though zope.component and zope.interface hadn't been
egged i
I went through the same motions as you in Zope2.12 trying to use Phillkon's
book as a guide. I think I ran into the same problem as you. The key is in
the package five.localsitemanager.
My Site Interface is nothing.
class IMySite(Interface):
"""My Site""
In my site.py I have the following.
.
Does anyone successfully use zope.formlib.form Fields with
Products.Five.formlib.formbase EditForm? I was trying to figure out why my
form_fields.omit and custom_widget were being ignored. I followed it up the
stack and found the method setUpEditWidgets in zope.app.form.utility never
takes Fields i
So createObject does look in the context of the current site. My issue was
somewhere else. I'm still interested to know if you can register utilities
at the site level in ZCML though.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Jim Pharis wrote:
> I should clarify that createobject is failin
I should clarify that createobject is failing with a ComponentLookupError.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Jim Pharis wrote:
>
> Can I register utilities at the site level in zcml? And once I have the
> local utility registered, how do I pass that site manager context to my
> brow
Can I register utilities at the site level in zcml? And once I have the
local utility registered, how do I pass that site manager context to my
browser/forms so I can do things like createObject. createObject seems to
fail because it can't find the utility, but I think that's because its not
lookin
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 11:47, Jim Pharis wrote:
> > What's my use case for developing Zope3ish/ZTKish in Zope2 instead of
> just
> > using Zope3? All the preceived benefits of Zope3 now available in Zope2
> well
> > still being able to use all our Zope 2
it etc/site.zcml. That's when I noticed that the
package-includes were by in large missing. At least it looks that way.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim Pharis wrote:
> > Yes, I'm runnin
g Products using the
esoteric manage_* methods, even in 2.12.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim Pharis wrote:
> > I have several existing Z2 Products that aren't going anywhere. I still
> need
&g
I have several existing Z2 Products that aren't going anywhere. I still need
these. I can't just move to Z3 and leave our existing Z2 Products behind.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim Pharis wro
ms. For example, zcml directives such as the one in
zope.app.container-3.8.0-py2.6.egg/zope/app/container/browser/meta.zcml:
name="containerViews" aren't wired into Z2.12 it seems. Trying to use
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim Pharis wr
So the line you reference in site.zcml is the same for me, and it says look
in package-includes/*-configure.zcml. That child dir wasn't actually created
though so theres nothing in it.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 01:28, Jim Phari
dreas Jung wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim Pharis wrote:
> > Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the implications of basing Zope2.12
> > on ZTK eggs. I was under the impression it would allow sites to be
> > developed in a similar w
n the Zope2.12 instance/etc dir. It seems like it should be
possible, but maybe not.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim Pharis wrote:
> > I'm trying to wrap my head around what the changes in Zop
I'm trying to wrap my head around what the changes in Zope2.12 can mean for
how I develop in Zope2 now. I've developed things in Zope3 and am getting
stuck attempting the same methods in Zope2.12. So I see now that etc/ now
has a site.zcml. But what is missing is the package-includes directory that
16 matches
Mail list logo
