Shane Hathaway wrote:
> I'm not sure how well MailHost scales, but you can certainly store
> thousands of names in a ZODB-managed list. Tests done for the
> BTreeFolder product prove it.
Sadly, I think MailHost doesn't scale too well :-(
What it'd need to do if you're sending the mail to a few
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
> > I'm not sure how well MailHost scales, but you can certainly store
> > thousands of names in a ZODB-managed list. Tests done for the
> > BTreeFolder product prove it.
>
> Sadly, I think MailHost doesn't scale too well :-(
>
> What it'd need to
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Perhaps it would be better to solve this by configuring your sendmail
> (or other SMTP MTA) to be non-blocking, i.e. store-and-forward.
Can you tell me how to set that up with exim?
> Also you could send just one message to all the recipients instead of
> sending individua
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Perhaps it would be better to solve this by configuring your sendmail
> (or other SMTP MTA) to be non-blocking, i.e. store-and-forward.
This seems like a good idea. It makes it hard to get disposition status
for the delivery in the transaction - but t
Techniques for effeciently sending a message to a large number of
recipients are covered extensively in majordomo documentation -
www.greatcircle.com/majordomo. Also check out
ftp://cs.utk.edu/pub/moore/bulk_mailer
Bill.
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Chris Withers wrote:
> > Also you could send just one
Chris Withers wrote:
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > Perhaps it would be better to solve this by configuring your sendmail
> > (or other SMTP MTA) to be non-blocking, i.e. store-and-forward.
>
> Can you tell me how to set that up with exim?
>
> > Also you could send just one message to all the recip
Terry Kerr wrote:
>
> Chris Withers wrote:
>
> > Hannu Krosing wrote:
> >
> > > Also you could send just one message to all the recipients instead of
> > > sending individual messages.
> >
> > Urm, they could be pretty unfriendly mail messages if they're being sent
> > to a coupla thousand peopl
"Jan H. Haul" wrote:
>
> Each of these will be around 42 KByte large.
>
> Huh? Why that? you ask.
> Because in the header of each mail, the whole recipient list will
> be listed under To: or Cc:
> [snip]
> - privacy: You would not like to have "your" recipients end up on
> other people's mailing
Michael Bernstein wrote:
>
> "Jan H. Haul" wrote:
> >
> > Each of these will be around 42 KByte large.
> >
> > Huh? Why that? you ask.
> > Because in the header of each mail, the whole recipient list will
> > be listed under To: or Cc:
> > [snip]
> > - privacy: You would not like to have "your" r
