-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garito wrote:
> 2009/4/27 Tres Seaver
at least try to don't threaten us with ban us if we
send you private messages by mistake
> I don't know what you are talking about here: I didn't threaten to ban
> anybody. I generally ask (politely
2009/4/27 Tres Seaver
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Garito wrote:
> > jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
> >
> > Amazing!
> >
> > I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field
> > jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
>
> I said "religious" because I meant that people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garito wrote:
> jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
>
> Amazing!
>
> I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field
> jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
I said "religious" because I meant that people have strong opinions
about which style they
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 19:45, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Patrick Gerken wrote:
>
>> Argl, why does this mailing list not use the reply-to: field?
>
> That would be a "religious" question, and one which is not helpful to
> debate here.. E.g., see:
>
>
jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
Amazing!
I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field
jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
What wonders me more is how belligerent some in this list are with this
question
You cause the problem, at least try to don't threaten us with ban us if we
send y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Gerken wrote:
> Argl, why does this mailing list not use the reply-to: field?
That would be a "religious" question, and one which is not helpful to
debate here.. E.g., see:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
The Zope mailing l
Argl, why does this mailing list not use the reply-to: field?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Patrick Gerken
Date: Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 15:43
Subject: Re: [Zope] Building a fast, scalable yet small Zope application
To: "Morten W. Petersen"
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 13:24, Morten W
