1) for the record, lapaye.fr is a (profitable) software editor that has been
building business applications on the top of Zope 2 for 5 years (payroll
software, not plone or whatever). We don't intend to switch to another
platform in the foreseeable future [we're zope2.9 right now]. Python
programme
Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Hi. FYI, I have a client using Zope 2 in production. I am migrating
> him from Zope 2.7 on SUSE 10.1 to Zope 2.10 on CentOS 5.2.
>
> He's not using plone. He has a custom Web app. He expects to keep
> using Zope 2, and to continue development of our Web applicatio
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 08:55, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> With my current experience, the Zope 3 way to handle skins is considerably
> more
> work then the previous CMF skinning. True, you have a separate namespace
> for views and thus avoid name clashes in edge cases -- but is this
> really worth th
Tim Nash wrote at 2009-4-5 14:05 -0700:
>Also, I have been critical of the zope 3 line because I love zope 2
>and it appears to me that zope 3 is killing zope 2.
I share your feeling.
With my current experience, the Zope 3 way to handle skins is considerably more
work then the previous CMF skinni
Looks like gmail won't append a sig to a draft email.
Anyway here is my sig.
--
Tim Nash
Lead Developer
http://www.sanmateowaveforms.com
Zope/Plone: distribute your web applications as desktop applications.
Installs on mac and windows with one click.
Thanks for this post Jürgen. You made me think of my agenda. My
agenda is to promote Zope/Plone as a great way to create web
applications that you also want to distribute as desktop applications.
I have posted about this a long time ago but there is no reason for
anyone on this list to remember, e
On Fri, April 3, 2009 21:18, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Hi. FYI, I have a client using Zope 2 in production. I am migrating
> him from Zope 2.7 on SUSE 10.1 to Zope 2.10 on CentOS 5.2.
>
> He's not using plone. He has a custom Web app. He expects to keep
> using Zope 2, and to continue devel
Hi. FYI, I have a client using Zope 2 in production. I am migrating
him from Zope 2.7 on SUSE 10.1 to Zope 2.10 on CentOS 5.2.
He's not using plone. He has a custom Web app. He expects to keep
using Zope 2, and to continue development of our Web application.
Best,
Aleksey Tsalolikhin
Unix sy
Tim Nash wrote:
>>> *This* community is dead, get over it and move on.
>
> Yeah, you are right.
>
> If you really think zope 3 (or 4) can stand on it's own,
"zope 3 app server" has a small community of users who've indicated
they're not wedded to that brand continuing.
"the zope framework" i
2009/4/2 Tim Nash :
> If you really think zope 3 (or 4) can stand on it's own, just rename
> zope 2 to 'plone base'. That will cut down on the confusion.
There are many more that uses Zope 2 besides Plone. But it is true,
and also likely A Good Thing that Zope 2 doesn't get many new users
nowadays
> > *This* community is dead, get over it and move on.
Yeah, you are right.
If you really think zope 3 (or 4) can stand on it's own, just rename
zope 2 to 'plone base'. That will cut down on the confusion.
But beware, unless you can make zope 4 more appealling to a wider
group of casual develop
Tim Nash wrote:
> No your response and Jens response are totally inappropriate. We will
> never rebuild this community if all our posts are greeted with personal
> attacks.
*This* community is dead, get over it and move on.
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
12 matches
Mail list logo