[Zope] Spam-Bounces

2006-01-17 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Hi, I'm getting bounces of messages sent to zope@zope.org with aparently large binary attachments. Luckily they are too big to get thru automatically. Looks like spammers are around and faking identities. Is it possible to enhance the list software to check gpg keys of posts? Just an idea...

Re: [Zope] Spam-Bounces

2006-01-17 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
On 17 Jan 2006, at 11:37, Tino Wildenhain wrote: Hi, I'm getting bounces of messages sent to zope@zope.org with aparently large binary attachments. Luckily they are too big to get thru automatically. Looks like spammers are around and faking identities. Is it possible to enhance the list sof

Re: [Zope] Spam-Bounces

2006-01-17 Thread Martijn Pieters
On 1/17/06, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm getting bounces of messages sent to zope@zope.org > with aparently large binary attachments. Luckily they > are too big to get thru automatically. The bounces themselves are fake perhaps? Why would you get bounces otherwise; you are not

Re: [Zope] Spam-Bounces

2006-01-17 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Jens Vagelpohl schrieb: ... What exactly would that do? Would you want to force everyone to use gpg keys? Sounds just a bit unrealistic. Yes, I feared it. After all it was just an idea. Alternatively the ability to register trusted MTAs with an address could help and would be completely tra

Re: [Zope] Spam-Bounces

2006-01-17 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Martijn Pieters schrieb: On 1/17/06, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alternatively the ability to register trusted MTAs with an address could help and would be completely transparent for those who dont care. Unfortunately the nature of open source communities around a domain name

Re: [Zope] Spam-Bounces

2006-01-17 Thread Martijn Pieters
On 1/17/06, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alternatively the ability to register trusted > MTAs with an address could help and would be completely > transparent for those who dont care. Unfortunately the nature of open source communities around a domain name is such that locking down

Re: [Zope] Spam-Bounces

2006-01-17 Thread Andrew Sawyers
IIRC, all of the zope mailing lists only accept mail from subscribers - so these are likely just someone spoofing the sender address. No reason to try and handle this on the list server side IMNSHO. Andrew On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 12:37 +0100, Tino Wildenhain wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting bounces of

Re: [Zope] Spam-Bounces

2006-01-17 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Andrew Sawyers schrieb: IIRC, all of the zope mailing lists only accept mail from subscribers - so these are likely just someone spoofing the sender address. No reason to try and handle this on the list server side IMNSHO. Of course they are. Thats the whole point :-) On which side do you thin

Re: [Zope] Spam-Bounces

2006-01-17 Thread Andrew Sawyers
I'm a little confused, if that's the whole point, not sure what the point is. Perhaps I jumped the gun by replying :). I guess I would setup a local procmail rule or posfix rule to not accept mail with these attachments? If the mail is not going through the zope mailservers, I'm not sure how one

Re: [Zope] Spam-Bounces

2006-01-17 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Andrew Sawyers schrieb: I'm a little confused, if that's the whole point, not sure what the point is. Perhaps I jumped the gun by replying :). I guess I would setup a local procmail rule or posfix rule to not accept mail with these attachments? If the mail is not going through the zope mailser