On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 06:58:31PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Lennart Regebro wrote at 2005-4-8 10:59 +0200:
> > ...
> >On Apr 8, 2005 8:48 AM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...
> >> Which "The Zope Book" are you referring to?
> >>
> >> The 2.6 one on Zope.org?
> >> The 2.7 one o
Lennart Regebro wrote at 2005-4-8 10:59 +0200:
> ...
>On Apr 8, 2005 8:48 AM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
>> Which "The Zope Book" are you referring to?
>>
>> The 2.6 one on Zope.org?
>> The 2.7 one on Plope.com?
>> The 3.whatever one somewhere-I-don't-know?
>
>I would expect it
No, sorry. THe canonical version is on the web.
- C
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 04:10, Dario Lopez-KÃsten wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
> > I don't think anyone has given much thought to actually documenting all
> > these nice nifty features in 2.9. Which is no change from the norm, and
> > it will
Chris McDonough wrote:
I don't think anyone has given much thought to actually documenting all
these nice nifty features in 2.9. Which is no change from the norm, and
it will be a fairly organic process again. I hate it, but whatever.
- C
Speaking of which, and being one of the people that promis
On Friday 08 April 2005 11:22, Paul Winkler wrote:
> The primary problem with the Zope Book is still the relative scarcity of
> resources (i.e. editors with time to work on it).
>
> The secondary problem with the Zope Book is that it's showing its age:
> the choice and organization of topics is IMH
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 06:06:57PM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2005 5:59 PM, Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the chapter-by-chapter editing is still not done.
> > See http://plope.com/Books/zb_signup for an overview of the known
> > tasks to be done.
>
> OK, but tha
On Apr 8, 2005 5:59 PM, Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, but there should at least be a pointer to something to read
> for people wanting to get started with 2.8.0/Five.
> I haven't yet looked at any of the Five stuff.
> Is there at least a README? :)
Sure. I don't guarantee that it's
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 05:41:30PM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2005 5:22 PM, Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But that leaves unanswered questions - should we document the Five stuff
> > at all, and if so, how?
>
> Well, the Five stuff is a subset of the Zope3 stuff, with
On Apr 8, 2005 5:22 PM, Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But that leaves unanswered questions - should we document the Five stuff
> at all, and if so, how?
Well, the Five stuff is a subset of the Zope3 stuff, with way too much
Zope2 stuff still necessary. The idea is that this should chan
I don't think anyone has given much thought to actually documenting all
these nice nifty features in 2.9. Which is no change from the norm, and
it will be a fairly organic process again. I hate it, but whatever.
- C
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 11:22, Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:59:46AM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2005 8:48 AM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dieter Maurer wrote:
> > > When will they feature in *the* "Zope Book"?
> >
> > Which "The Zope Book" are you referring to?
> >
> > The 2.6 one on Zope.org?
> >
On Apr 8, 2005 8:48 AM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dieter Maurer wrote:
> > When will they feature in *the* "Zope Book"?
>
> Which "The Zope Book" are you referring to?
>
> The 2.6 one on Zope.org?
> The 2.7 one on Plope.com?
> The 3.whatever one somewhere-I-don't-know?
I would e
Dieter Maurer wrote:
When will they feature in *the* "Zope Book"?
Which "The Zope Book" are you referring to?
The 2.6 one on Zope.org?
The 2.7 one on Plope.com?
The 3.whatever one somewhere-I-don't-know?
It's the age old documentation problem coming back to bite us again :-S
cheers,
Chris
--
Simpli
13 matches
Mail list logo
