Nils Kassube wrote:
The thread at the ZEO list is indeed very interesting.
I wanted to write something like this:
http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zope-zeo/2000-September/000131.html
Nice to see someone else having the same thoughts.
I strongly commit the thoughts described in the
Marcin Kasperski wrote:
It seems to me that it would be easier to implement complete
version-control mechanisms within Zope (there is Undo, there are
versions, there is export/import) than to build better integration with
external VC tools, but this is just an opinion.
I think that's right,
That's not to say that Greg's difficulties are unique. I just don't
think his solution is appropriate for most. Synchronization is a major
need for Zope. In fact, I have some working code! But *I need
feedback*.
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/SynchronizationTab
The
snip
1) "Code Collisions." - Developers overwriting each other's work.
2) Partial updates - Right now, we have new pages for marketing
content that are held up because we don't have our new features for
the application done yet. So we can't update marketing pages without
updating
Shane Hathaway wrote:
I would say there are simply too many developments happening for anyone to
keep up. I can understand why my little proposal has been overlooked--it
doesn't seem very exciting. :-)
There *is* too much going on, but I'm *very* excited by this proposal.
Using versions
