On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 16:56, Jean-Michel FRANCOIS
jeanmichel.franc...@makina-corpus.com wrote:
Is someone has try to use ZopeProfiler with KCacheGrind ? I would like
to try KCachegrind because i found xdot very slow.
I have started to read the code of ZopeProfiler and i have discovered
the
Sebastien Douche a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 16:56, Jean-Michel FRANCOIS
jeanmichel.franc...@makina-corpus.com wrote:
Is someone has try to use ZopeProfiler with KCacheGrind ? I would like
to try KCachegrind because i found xdot very slow.
I have started to read the code of
Dieter Maurer a écrit :
Jean-Michel FRANCOIS wrote at 2009-1-28 16:56 +0100:
Is someone has try to use ZopeProfiler with KCacheGrind ? I would like
to try KCachegrind because i found xdot very slow.
I have started to read the code of ZopeProfiler and i have discovered
the world of
It's done, i m now able to use KCachegrind with ZopeProfiler. I have
patched pyprof2calltree to work with python2.4:
diff -U 3 -H -d -r -N --
pyprof2calltree-1.1.0-py2.4.egg/pyprof2calltree.py
pyprof2calltree-1.1.0-py2.4.egg.NEW//pyprof2calltree.py
---
Is someone has try to use ZopeProfiler with KCacheGrind ? I would like
to try KCachegrind because i found xdot very slow.
I have started to read the code of ZopeProfiler and i have discovered
the world of profiling file format. It seems that ZopeProfiler save it's
file in pstats format. So i need
Jean-Michel FRANCOIS wrote at 2009-1-28 16:56 +0100:
Is someone has try to use ZopeProfiler with KCacheGrind ? I would like
to try KCachegrind because i found xdot very slow.
I have started to read the code of ZopeProfiler and i have discovered
the world of profiling file format. It seems that
