Jonothan Farr wrote:
Is it possible to have just one top level object that refers to
other objects that get overridden as you go into other folders?
Acquisition works the other way around. You can create objects in subfolders
whose contents are overriden higher up. You can't have an
TECTED]
Cc: Bob Horvath [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 1:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] acquisition vs. inheritance
Jonothan Farr wrote:
Is it possible to have just one top level object that refers to
other objects that get overridden as you go into oth
I am slowly getting the hang of Zope, but am confused about
something.
Either I don't understand how acquisition works, or there is
something special about how index_html is treated.
I had a folder with a index_html that had something like:
dtml-var standard_html_header
dtml-var content
Bob Horvath wrote:
I would have thought it would have gone up a layer for index_html,
but then would have discovered content at the lower layer.
Sounds like your index_html is a DTML Document when it should be a DTML
method...
cheers,
Chris
___
Is it possible to have just one top level object that refers to
other objects that get overridden as you go into other folders?
Acquisition works the other way around. You can create objects in subfolders
whose contents are overriden higher up. You can't have an object at the top
whose
