Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Bengtsson wrote at 2005-7-8 13:24 +0100:
I've learnt that it's better to use getSecurityManager instead of
REQUEST.AUTHENTICATED_USER
because it's more secure. Other than that, what is the difference.
I've learnt that it's better to use getSecurityManager instead of
REQUEST.AUTHENTICATED_USER
because it's more secure. Other than that, what is the difference. I
fear I've come a across a situation when getSecurityManager() returns
nothing where AUTHENTICATED_USER did. I'm currently trying to
--On 8. Juli 2005 13:24:20 +0100 Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've learnt that it's better to use getSecurityManager instead of
REQUEST.AUTHENTICATED_USER
because it's more secure. Other than that, what is the difference. I
fear I've come a across a situation when
On 7/8/05, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Bengtsson wrote at 2005-7-8 13:24 +0100:
I've learnt that it's better to use getSecurityManager instead of
REQUEST.AUTHENTICATED_USER
because it's more secure. Other than that, what is the difference.
The security manager could be
