Re: [Zope] Backing Up Zope (was: Re: [Zope] Data.fs.lock?)

2000-06-30 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:19:32 -0400, Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Quite simply, Data.fs is appended, not modified, except during a pack >operation. Think of it like a binary log file. Therefore there are >only two ways a simple, live backup of Data.fs can fail: > >1) You do the cop

RE: [Zope] Backing Up Zope (was: Re: [Zope] Data.fs.lock?)

2000-06-29 Thread Erik Enge
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Wilkinson Charlie E wrote: > This would be consistent with "atomic updates." What it means is > that a transaction is not written to the Data.fs file until it has > completed, and when it is finally written out, it's done as an > atomic operation, i.e. at the system level it

RE: [Zope] Backing Up Zope (was: Re: [Zope] Data.fs.lock?)

2000-06-29 Thread Wilkinson Charlie E
Title: RE: [Zope] Backing Up Zope (was: Re: [Zope] Data.fs.lock?) > -Original Message- > From: Erik Enge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Jeff K. Hoffman wrote: > > > It is my understanding that the ZODB on disk is always in a > consistent

Re: [Zope] Backing Up Zope (was: Re: [Zope] Data.fs.lock?)

2000-06-29 Thread Shane Hathaway
"Jeff K. Hoffman" wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Erik Enge wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Jeff K. Hoffman wrote: > > > > > It is my understanding that the ZODB on disk is always in a consistent > > > state; Jim has said, in the past, that you can simply make a copy of > > > Data.fs, even whi

RE: [Zope] Backing Up Zope (was: Re: [Zope] Data.fs.lock?)

2000-06-29 Thread Jeff K. Hoffman
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Erik Enge wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Jeff K. Hoffman wrote: > > > It is my understanding that the ZODB on disk is always in a consistent > > state; Jim has said, in the past, that you can simply make a copy of > > Data.fs, even while Zope is running, without problems. >

Re: [Zope] Backing Up Zope (was: Re: [Zope] Data.fs.lock?)

2000-06-29 Thread Bill Anderson
> Wilkinson Charlie E wrote: > > Just to start by pointing out the bloody obvious: > > - Restoring from backup means you lose all data between > backup date/time and system failure. Sucks, but it > beats losing *all* your data. (RAID5 anyone?) A) Please: no html! B) I just had one weird

RE: [Zope] Backing Up Zope (was: Re: [Zope] Data.fs.lock?)

2000-06-29 Thread Erik Enge
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Jeff K. Hoffman wrote: > It is my understanding that the ZODB on disk is always in a consistent > state; Jim has said, in the past, that you can simply make a copy of > Data.fs, even while Zope is running, without problems. But the Data.fs has to be updated sometimes. And i

RE: [Zope] Backing Up Zope (was: Re: [Zope] Data.fs.lock?)

2000-06-29 Thread Jeff K. Hoffman
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Wilkinson Charlie E wrote: > Another random thought is that if ZODB transactions and > writes are atomic, than none of this should be an issue. > Anyone know the answer to that one? It is my understanding that the ZODB on disk is always in a consistent state; Jim has said, i

RE: [Zope] Backing Up Zope (was: Re: [Zope] Data.fs.lock?)

2000-06-29 Thread Wilkinson Charlie E
Title: RE: [Zope] Backing Up Zope (was: Re: [Zope] Data.fs.lock?) Just to start by pointing out the bloody obvious: - Restoring from backup means you lose all data between   backup date/time and system failure.  Sucks, but it   beats losing *all* your data.  (RAID5 anyone?) - With that in