On Jun 11, 2008, at 14:31 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm wondering about the need to provide tarballs for GenericSetup
through zope.org alongside the tarball on PyPI. It's extra work and
the GenericSetup pages on zope.org don't offer any added value ov
Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm wondering about the need to provide tarballs for GenericSetup
> through zope.org alongside the tarball on PyPI. It's extra work and
> the GenericSetup pages on zope.org don't offer any added value over
> its PyPI page.
We'll keep using tar
Hi guys,
I'm wondering about the need to provide tarballs for GenericSetup
through zope.org alongside the tarball on PyPI. It's extra work and
the GenericSetup pages on zope.org don't offer any added value over
its PyPI page.
In order to simplify release management I propose the following
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Tue Jun 10 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Jun 11 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : CMF-1.6 Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Tue Jun 10 21:42:26 EDT 2008
URL: htt
