Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility?

2008-11-19 Thread Ross Patterson
Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > yuppie wrote: >> Hi Dieter! >> >> >> Dieter Maurer wrote: >>> Thus, why do local utilities registered by Five (i.e. these utilities are >>> for Zope2 use) do not provide access to the request in the normal >>> Zope2 way? >> >> That's what we tried fir

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility?

2008-11-19 Thread Dieter Maurer
Martin Aspeli wrote at 2008-11-18 16:25 +: > ... >This won't solve this particular problem, but it may be worth looking at >how other frameworks work. Pylons, for example, has the request >available as "global" variable - actually a thread-local. Zope could set >the request as a thread local

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility?

2008-11-19 Thread Dieter Maurer
yuppie wrote at 2008-11-18 12:00 +0100: >Dieter Maurer wrote: >> Thus, why do local utilities registered by Five (i.e. these utilities are >> for Zope2 use) do not provide access to the request in the normal >> Zope2 way? > >That's what we tried first. But it turned out that Zope 3's site manager

[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 6 OK

2008-11-19 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Tue Nov 18 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Nov 19 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: CMF Tests Date: Tue Nov 18 20:59:30 EST 2008 URL: ht