Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2009, at 22:47 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
>> Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>>> On Mar 9, 2009, at 21:09 , Miles wrote:
>>>
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to register an adapter to
provide
Miles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell me if it is possible to register an adapter to provide a
> different IndexableObjectWrapper class from the stock CMF one? There's
> some sort of framework code that hints that it ought to enable this, but
> I can't see how!
>
> The code still seems to in
Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> It's nice to see that Plone has it, but that doesn't help anyone
> working off the CMF itself. I wish there was more communication to
> determine where improvements fit best. Not knowing how Plone
> implemented it I would make a guess this one small item wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 9, 2009, at 22:47 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> On Mar 9, 2009, at 21:09 , Miles wrote:
>>
>>> Can anyone tell me if it is possible to register an adapter to
>>> provide a
>>> different IndexableObjectWrapper
Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2009, at 21:09 , Miles wrote:
>
> > Can anyone tell me if it is possible to register an adapter to
> > provide a
> > different IndexableObjectWrapper class from the stock CMF one?
> > There's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 9, 2009, at 21:09 , Miles wrote:
> Can anyone tell me if it is possible to register an adapter to
> provide a
> different IndexableObjectWrapper class from the stock CMF one?
> There's
> some sort of framework code that hints that it ough
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to register an adapter to provide a
different IndexableObjectWrapper class from the stock CMF one? There's
some sort of framework code that hints that it ought to enable this, but
I can't see how!
The code still seems to instantiate the wrapper directl
