On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Aug 17, 2009, at 16:45 , Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>> Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.2 : Linux
>>> Fro
On 4/22/07, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rocky wrote:
> On Apr 19, 12:52 pm, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -1 to relying on five.localsitemanager, especially if it means other site
>> managers somewhere inside the CMF site wi
On 4/15/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alec Mitchell wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dieter Maurer wrote:
>>> Alec Mitchell wrote at 2007-4-12 06:59 -0700:
>>>> ...
>>>> ... deprecation of "
On 4/15/07, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Mitchell wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dieter Maurer wrote:
>>> Alec Mitchell wrote at 2007-4-12 06:59 -0700:
>>>>
On 4/15/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Alec Mitchell wrote at 2007-4-12 06:59 -0700:
>> ...
>> ... deprecation of "getToolByName" ...
>> which is that there's no practical reason other than
>> aesthetics to d
On 4/11/07, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:09:27 -0400, Jens Vagelpohl
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 10 Apr 2007, at 10:30, yuppie wrote:
>>> Currently non-five.lsm site managers don't work in CMF, see this thread:
>>>
>>> http://mail
On 4/3/07, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
Alec Mitchell wrote:
> On 4/1/07, yuppie wrote:
>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> > You're suggesting to introduce yet another package that's destined
>> to go
>> > a way at some point,
On 4/1/07, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> I would say that all of Acquisition is dark implicit magic and something
>> I expect when developing in Zope 2. When using Zope 3 concepts in Zope 2
>> I also expect the need to make
Looking at the changes rocky made, I don't see why allowing external
methods from non-Products should require making the whole process
completely dynamic on every call. The old mechanism of storing the
product list should be put back in place, along with the addition of
non-Product information to
On 11/15/06, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Mitchell wrote:
> On 11/15/06, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Alec Mitchell wrot
On 11/15/06, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Mitchell wrote:
> Tres,
>
> What are your feeling about this? Is there a reason not to jettison
> the toolset registry, other than backwards compatibility?
>
> Thanks
Tres,
What are your feeling about this? Is there a reason not to jettison
the toolset registry, other than backwards compatibility?
Thanks,
Alec
On 11/14/06, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Alec!
Alec Mitchell wrote:
> So I've recently run into a bit of a problem
Hi everyone,
So I've recently run into a bit of a problem involving the extension
profiles and the toolset registry. The issue is that if I install an
extension profile that overrides one of the tools from the base
profile, then switch back to the base profile (but not run any steps),
then switc
On 8/24/06, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Alec!
...
Fine. But please use the global CHANGES.txt file. DCWorkflow/CHANGES.txt
is discontinued since more than 2 years.
Sorry about that, I thought that version number looked a little odd.
Alec
_
On 6/3/06, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3 Jun 2006, at 14:06, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 12:34:53 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> BTW: Next week I plan to land ZCML support and non-Products
>
CMFEditions makes heavy use of CMFUid, though if an alternate
preferred uid generation mechanism were decided upon, it likely
wouldn't be hard to switch.
Alec
On 4/26/06, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 26 Apr 2006, at 07:40, Ma
On 2/11/06, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:04:39 -, Jens Vagelpohl
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There is no such code right now and AFAIK no one has even looked at it.
> > If anyone wants to take this up and the proposal/code is accepted the
> > earliest
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 00:17, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:43:40 -, Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Martin Aspeli wrote:
> >> The broader point is we wouldn't really need it yet - we don't have
> >> any code that actually uses these new features, and plenty of
On 1/15/06, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Previously Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:06:43AM -, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> > | So - one problem is that there is a lot of Plone software out there that
> > | just assumes all content types are Archetypes.
> >
> >
On 1/13/06, Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just going to add my 2 cents regarding non-specific-plone_schemas zope 3
> functionality.
>
> > - Ability to make custom views easily
>
> Customizing views happens with overrides.zcml today. No plone_schemas
> required. This should work for w
On 1/11/06, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:16:11 -, Martijn Faassen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Additionally, I think sometimes doing some of 1 can be beneficial to 2.
> > In particular, it may be worthwhile to start supporting Z3 widgets in
> > Archety
On Monday 21 November 2005 06:30 am, Chris Withers wrote:
> > *) And calls CMFCatalogAware.reindexObjectSecurity()
> > which reindexes the object only on the security index, and doesn't touch
> > metadata.
>
> Does reindexObjectSecurity do anything other than just the reindex the
>
Howdy CMFers,
So, Sidnei has been plugging away at the "AT reindexes things an obscene
number of times" issue today, and appears to have fixed many of the AT
triggered indexing redundancies. There are however still a few places in
CMF where some cataloging redundancy might be avoided. One obv
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 01:41 pm, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> I'd like to have some clarifications from the Plone team about what
> they expect to do w.r.t. events in CMF 1.6.
>
> I see two possibilities:
> 1. you guys are prepared to do the work needed for Plone products to
> use super() in m
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 10:43 am, Rob Miller wrote:
> Florent Guillaume wrote:
> > Rob Miller wrote:
> >> CatalogMultiplex is a subclass of CMFCatalogAware which overrides the
> >> (un/re)indexObject methods to perform operations in multiple catalogs,
> >> if necessary. your patch changes CMFC
On Sunday 13 November 2005 05:21 am, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Rob Miller wrote:
> > Florent Guillaume wrote:
> >> +1 on branching CMF 1.6 soon, with the goal of:
> >> - dropping support for Zope 2.7
> >> - allowing Five 1.2 events activated to work, even if it doesn't
> >> *require* Five 1.2
On Monday 05 September 2005 09:27 am, Geoff Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:15:41 +0200, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> >>> If an FSPageTemplate is associated with a Caching Policy and that
> >>> Caching Policy has 304s explicitly enabled, a series of checks take
> >>> place. If there is an If-M
s handles the same (or similar) usecases in a different but
potentially more flexible manner. Plone uses it to register all sorts of
tool methods, rather than indexing python scripts or something similarly
inefficient. Hopefully this might make it into the CMF core at some point.
Alec Mitchell
__
On Monday 01 August 2005 06:55 am, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> However I'd like to urge the "Plone guys" (95% of which don't bother to
> read or post in this list) to move their collective butts and actually
> implement forward-compatibility in Plone itself rather that, once more,
> tying the releas
On Thursday 14 July 2005 11:27 am, yuppie wrote:
> Hi Alec!
>
> Alec Mitchell wrote:
> > I recently noticed that the recent addition of default type profiles to
> > CMFDefault (e.g. CMFDefault/profiles/default/types/Topic.xml), has the
> > very unwelcome side-effe
meta_type of the
FTI they are altering before making potentially undesirable changes?
Thanks,
Alec Mitchell
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports
On Thursday 30 June 2005 09:11 am, Alec Mitchell wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've noticed something odd when viewing the Plone 2.1 (CMF-1.5 branch)
> front-page as Anonymous. The 'user' action 'join' defined in
> portal_registration gives as it's url '
Hello all,
I've noticed something odd when viewing the Plone 2.1 (CMF-1.5 branch)
front-page as Anonymous. The 'user' action 'join' defined in
portal_registration gives as it's url 'http://mysite/test_site/join_form', as
expected. The same action when retrieved again in 'portlet_login' gives
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 08:14 am, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Florent Guillaume wrote:
> > Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>In our regular profiles, "listFilteredActionsFor" belongs to
> >>the top consumers of CPU time.
> >>
> >>Recently, I found the main culprit (in CMF 1.4):
> >>
> >>
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 10:13 pm, Andreas Jung wrote:
> --On Dienstag, 5. April 2005 22:29 Uhr +0200 Dieter Maurer
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In our case, "listFilteredActionsFor" spends about 70 percent
> > of its complete time in the checking of "action in catlist".
>
> I did some profil
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 01:29 pm, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> In our regular profiles, "listFilteredActionsFor" belongs to
> the top consumers of CPU time.
>
> Recently, I found the main culprit (in CMF 1.4):
>
>It is the completely unnecessary:
>
> if not action in catlist:
>
> In our case,
36 matches
Mail list logo
