Hi!
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I don't know how such a feature removal or deprecation would be
handled on the CMF level.
AFAICS IWorkflowAware and IOpaqueItemManager methods (as defined in CMF
2.2) were added to CMFCatalogAware because at that time events were not
available and it was easier
Am 11.08.2009, 20:06 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de:
I propose to split up CMFCatalogAware in CatalogAware, WorkflowAware and
OpaqueItemManager mixins. All the interfaces provided by these base
classes should be optional for CMF content. PortalFolderBase e.g. is not
catalog or
Charlie Clark a écrit :
Am 09.08.2009, 04:48 Uhr, schrieb Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com:
self_base = aq_base(self)
for name in self_base.__dict__.keys()
obj = getattr(self, name)
if ICallableOpaqueItem.providedBy(obj):
items.append((obj.getId(), obj))
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 9, 2009, at 21:03 , Charlie Clark wrote:
From my previous answer to this which I forgot to send to the list
as well
- can we change the list settings so that answers go to it by default?
No. See
Charlie Clark a écrit :
Am 10.08.2009, 08:45 Uhr, schrieb toutpt tou...@gmail.com:
Thank you Charlie for this answer and this Read The Fucking
Interfaces .
Well, although it's a truism that if you read the code you'll find the
answer, it does also take a while to get used to
Am 09.08.2009, 04:48 Uhr, schrieb Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com:
self_base = aq_base(self)
for name in self_base.__dict__.keys()
obj = getattr(self, name)
if ICallableOpaqueItem.providedBy(obj):
items.append((obj.getId(), obj))
That's just *nuts*!
From my previous
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Charlie Clarkchar...@begeistert.org wrote:
Is the patch for Plone or CMF?
It's for Plone, I guess. The problem is solved in Plone 4.0 itself
(via monkey-patching CMF).
If it's for CMF then you should consider simply submitting a patch or
opening a branch. But
On 2009-8-8 11:53, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Charlie Clarkchar...@begeistert.org wrote:
Is the patch for Plone or CMF?
It's for Plone, I guess. The problem is solved in Plone 4.0 itself
(via monkey-patching CMF).
If it's for CMF then you should consider
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 2009-8-8 11:53, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Charlie Clarkchar...@begeistert.org
wrote:
Is the patch for Plone or CMF?
It's for Plone, I guess. The problem is solved in Plone 4.0 itself
(via monkey-patching CMF).
If it's for CMF
Am 07.08.2009, 22:17 Uhr, schrieb toutpt tou...@gmail.com:
experimental.opaquespeedup is good but not enough for me. The load tests
results are not enough, I want to be more 'aggressive' and
experimental. For me this package is backward compatible and do a
catalog query instead of parsing
Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:09 PM, toutpttou...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't really understand why all these improvements are not merged
inside plone3.X and CMF and are marked up as 'experimental'.
The opaque items issue at hand is not a simple and clear bug
Hi,
I m currently profiling the code of Plone to find performance issue and
fix them (i m sure there are a lot).
There are things I don't understand very well, so sorry if I m wrong.
The code of CMFCatalogAware.opaqueItems parse every attributes of
plonesite and evaluate this for each
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:46 PM, toutpttou...@gmail.com wrote:
I m currently profiling the code of Plone to find performance issue and
fix them (i m sure there are a lot).
Did you try to install all the experimental.* (opaquespeedup,
contentcreation, catalogqueryplan) packages that have been
Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:46 PM, toutpttou...@gmail.com wrote:
I m currently profiling the code of Plone to find performance issue and
fix them (i m sure there are a lot).
Did you try to install all the experimental.* (opaquespeedup,
contentcreation,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:09 PM, toutpttou...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't really understand why all these improvements are not merged
inside plone3.X and CMF and are marked up as 'experimental'.
The opaque items issue at hand is not a simple and clear bug fix. On
the Plone level we have decided to
15 matches
Mail list logo
