[Zope-CMF] Re: Products-less python package support for CMF 1.6

2006-06-06 Thread yuppie
Dieter Maurer wrote: yuppie wrote at 2006-6-4 18:12 +0200: ... AFAIK registerDirectory and registerProfile work only inside of Products. At least in CMF 1.5, registerDirectory works outside Products, too. Due to some bad design, it stops working when Products is somewhere inside the path

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Products-less python package support for CMF 1.6

2006-06-05 Thread Dieter Maurer
yuppie wrote at 2006-6-4 18:12 +0200: ... AFAIK registerDirectory and registerProfile work only inside of Products. At least in CMF 1.5, registerDirectory works outside Products, too. Due to some bad design, it stops working when Products is somewhere inside the path (even if not a complete

[Zope-CMF] Re: Products-less python package support for CMF 1.6

2006-06-04 Thread yuppie
Hi Rocky! Rocky Burt wrote: As of Five 1.4, the Five specific functionality has been merged into Five itself. As of Zope 2.10, the Zope specific functionality has been merged into Zope itself. So all that remains now is CMF. The biggest problem with CMF was

[Zope-CMF] Re: Products-less python package support for CMF 1.6

2006-06-04 Thread yuppie
Hi Rocky! Rocky Burt wrote: On Sun, 2006-04-06 at 18:12 +0200, yuppie wrote: Rocky Burt wrote: What do you all think? Something we can include in time for CMF1.6.1 beta2 ? I don't care much about CMF 1.6, but I wonder in which case your patch is useful. Are you suggesting that people

[Zope-CMF] Re: Products-less python package support for CMF 1.6

2006-06-04 Thread Tres Seaver
yuppie wrote: Hi Rocky! Rocky Burt wrote: On Sun, 2006-04-06 at 18:12 +0200, yuppie wrote: Rocky Burt wrote: What do you all think? Something we can include in time for CMF1.6.1 beta2 ? I don't care much about CMF 1.6, but I wonder in which case your patch is useful. Are you suggesting

[Zope-CMF] Re: Products-less python package support for CMF 1.6

2006-06-04 Thread Florent Guillaume
Tres Seaver wrote: yuppie wrote: Hi Rocky! Rocky Burt wrote: On Sun, 2006-04-06 at 18:12 +0200, yuppie wrote: Rocky Burt wrote: What do you all think? Something we can include in time for CMF1.6.1 beta2 ? I don't care much about CMF 1.6, but I wonder in which case your patch is useful.