Paul Winkler wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:34:09AM +0100, Paul Everitt wrote:
Hi all. I'd like to make a small proposal to enable investigation of a
larger proposal.
I'm generally interested in the ideas of pipelines for markup rendering.
Specifically, I'm interested in separating the
> 1) Does the CMF have an interest in experimenting with ideas on
> splitting corporate ID responsibilities from product skin responsibilities?
I certainly do. I'm actually of the opinion that ZPT is a pretty nice way of
doing UI re-use and customisation (no-one's shown me anything significantly
Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:34:09AM +0100, Paul Everitt wrote:
> >
> > Hi all. I'd like to make a small proposal to enable investigation of a
> To me, sure. Anything with the potential to reduce complexity of
> main_template and increase cohesion is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:40:40AM +0100, Paul Everitt wrote:
>
>>Paul Winkler wrote:
>>
>>>3) Universal. The corporate id is not optional. It gets imposed on
>>>every page in a site.
>>>"""
>>>
>>>That goes too far IMO. Opt-in i
Seb Bacon wrote:
On 11/30/05, Paul Everitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Still, I'm hoping that my small, 3-line proposal doesn't get changed
into a "let's replace templating systems" discussion. :^) I'm trying to
find the smallest necessary part to cover the maximum interest.
Again to the CMF co
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:40:40AM +0100, Paul Everitt wrote:
> Paul Winkler wrote:
> > 3) Universal. The corporate id is not optional. It gets imposed on
> >every page in a site.
> >"""
> >
> >That goes too far IMO. Opt-in is a pain, but if you remove it, we need
> >to add an "opt-out" feature. Co
Paul Winkler wrote at 2005-11-30 10:33 -0500:
> ...
>When you customize a FSPageTemplate, you get a plain ZopePageTemplate.
>So you'll need to find a way to post-process the output of those
>without requiring a change to core Zope, or this becomes a Zope
>proposal. Unfortunately I haven't a clue h
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:24:56PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Paul Winkler wrote at 2005-11-30 10:33 -0500:
> > ...
> >When you customize a FSPageTemplate, you get a plain ZopePageTemplate.
> >So you'll need to find a way to post-process the output of those
> >without requiring a change to core
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:24:56PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
| Paul Winkler wrote at 2005-11-30 10:33 -0500:
| > ...
| >When you customize a FSPageTemplate, you get a plain ZopePageTemplate.
| >So you'll need to find a way to post-process the output of those
| >without requiring a change to core
On 11/30/05, Paul Everitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still, I'm hoping that my small, 3-line proposal doesn't get changed
> into a "let's replace templating systems" discussion. :^) I'm trying to
> find the smallest necessary part to cover the maximum interest.
>
> Again to the CMF community: in
Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2005-11-30 18:26 -0200:
>On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:24:56PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>| Paul Winkler wrote at 2005-11-30 10:33 -0500:
>| > ...
>| Instead, you change the "makeZODBClone" (or similar method)
>| of "FSPageTemplate" and create a (new) "CMFPageTemplate".
>| (
11 matches
Mail list logo
