Ah! The idea of more registries is what I'd have to go with I guess ... I'll have a look and debate whether it's worth it :)
Thanks for the insight! J.F. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of yuppie Sent: September 17, 2007 13:49 To: Zope-CMF List Subject: [Zope-CMF] Re: Design approach questions: unique content-ish items? Hi! Doyon, Jean-Francois wrote: > The componentutility from GS wants the object to be in the root for > some reason (Although from reading the code, it wasn't always so?). > > Maybe I can run a provideUtility() on the objects I'm interested in > myself manually ... What is the rational for only supporting objects > in the root? 1.) Registering objects from sub-folders in the root site manager doesn't work without problems because utilities can't be stored with acquisition wrappers and the re-wrapping always uses the root as context. 2.) It is possible to add additional site managers to sub-folders. That works fine, just the GenericSetup support is missing: http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/500 Cheers, Yuppie _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
