Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2009, at 15:16 , Maurits van Rees wrote:
>
>> Personally, I am the maintainer of Products.Poi. It will take more
>> than one bottle of whisky to convince me to rename that. ;-)
>
> Personally, I believe most product authors who have a real Zope 2
> Product bu
On Sep 24, 2009, at 15:16 , Maurits van Rees wrote:
Personally, I am the maintainer of Products.Poi. It will take more
than one bottle of whisky to convince me to rename that. ;-)
Personally, I believe most product authors who have a real Zope 2
Product but chose a name other than "Product
Charlie Clark, on 2009-09-24:
> Am 24.09.2009, 14:09 Uhr, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl :
>
>> Renaming provides less than little perceived gain. It adds serious pain
>> because then you must go about registering your package manually, you
>> must change imports all over, and you force every package t
Am 24.09.2009, 14:09 Uhr, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl :
> Renaming provides less than little perceived gain. It adds serious pain
> because then you must go about registering your package manually, you
> must change imports all over, and you force every package that depends
> on the CMF to do the
On Sep 24, 2009, at 14:01 , Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 24.09.2009, 13:52 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Jung :
In my understanding: packages using the Products namespace are
subject
to be registered during the startup phase of Zope (using their
initialize()
method). And I think there is some other evil
Am 24.09.2009, 13:52 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Jung :
> In my understanding: packages using the Products namespace are subject
> to be registered during the startup phase of Zope (using their
> initialize()
> method). And I think there is some other evil path magic within Zope
> related to products i
Am 24.09.09 13:47, schrieb Charlie Clark:
> Am 24.09.2009, 13:43 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Jung :
>
>
>> How come? Did I miss something?
>>
> Well - and it's more than likely that I'm mistaken! - eggs allow you to
> define the namespace under which you can find them and for CMF we're
> prese
Am 24.09.2009, 13:43 Uhr, schrieb Andreas Jung :
> How come? Did I miss something?
Well - and it's more than likely that I'm mistaken! - eggs allow you to
define the namespace under which you can find them and for CMF we're
preserving "Products". And we've opted to keep the from Products.CMF.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 13:42, Charlie Clark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it struck me the other day, that Zope 2.12 and eggs mean that we don't
> have to keep the Products namespace.
>
How come? Did I miss something?
Andreas
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zo
Hi,
it struck me the other day, that Zope 2.12 and eggs mean that we don't
have to keep the Products namespace. Has it been kept purely for
convenience? (It would be a lot of fairly monotonous editing to change) Or
is this an explicit Zope 2 convention for preserving the Products
namespace
10 matches
Mail list logo
