[Fred Drake]
>> I don't see a need to include the disclaimer about Python 2.4; I test
>> on 2.4, and use Zope 3 trunk with 2.4.1 all the time.
[Paul Winkler]
> Maybe you do, but it really is a FAQ, and that's the consensus response
> from the chorus every time it comes up on the main zope list, so
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:04:48PM -0400, Fred Drake wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:21:32PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
> > Done. Like I said, just trivial docs typos.
>
> Yeah, but improvements are improvements!
>
> On 6/10/05, Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While I'm at it, an
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Paul Winkler]
> > Holy crap, FAQ.txt is rally crufty.
> > It's loaded with pcgi information and other useless crap.
> > Gimme a minute to come up with a better patch.
> > I should make a branch for this.
>
> I vote you check in cha
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:21:32PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
> Done. Like I said, just trivial docs typos.
Yeah, but improvements are improvements!
On 6/10/05, Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I'm at it, anybody object to the attached patch to
> doc/FAQ.txt ?
I don't see a need
[Paul Winkler]
> Holy crap, FAQ.txt is rally crufty.
> It's loaded with pcgi information and other useless crap.
> Gimme a minute to come up with a better patch.
> I should make a branch for this.
I vote you check in changes instead, until you run out of time. Every
improvement will lessen co
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:07:51PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:21:32PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
> > Done. Like I said, just trivial docs typos.
>
> While I'm at it, anybody object to the attached patch to
> doc/FAQ.txt ?
(snip)
Holy crap, FAQ.txt is rally cruft
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:21:32PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
> Done. Like I said, just trivial docs typos.
While I'm at it, anybody object to the attached patch to
doc/FAQ.txt ?
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
Index: FAQ.txt
==
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
> --On 10. Juni 2005 12:39:50 -0400 Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On 6/10/05, Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Mind if I check in text-only changes to the 2_8 branch?
> >
> >It's still Friday for Andreas, so this
--On 10. Juni 2005 12:39:50 -0400 Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/10/05, Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mind if I check in text-only changes to the 2_8 branch?
It's still Friday for Andreas, so this is a good time!
yeah...countdown is running :-)
-aj
pgprqef5iEsSb.
On 6/10/05, Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mind if I check in text-only changes to the 2_8 branch?
It's still Friday for Andreas, so this is a good time!
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Coders mailing list
Zope-
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 05:24:08PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
> Heads up for the 2.8.0 final release. My plans are to make the final
> release on Saturday morning. So any further changes should be done by
> tomorrow at the latest.
>
> Cheers,
> -aj
Mind if I check in text-only changes to the 2_
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Jun 9 11:01:02 2005 UTC to Fri Jun 10 11:01:02 2005 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2_6-branch Python-2.1.3 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Thu Jun 9 23:26:29 EDT 2
12 matches
Mail list logo