Hello,
I wonder if someone can send me a simple example using the ZPatterns
framework. I read all the source, and I still can't figure out what is
the relationship between the objects instantiated by the Racks and the
Rackmountable objects. Also, why do the rack try to instantiate a
ZClass???
I'
> While I'm at it, is there any way to make DTML methods accessible to
> objects (such as other DTML methods) but not through URLs other than by a
> tortuous series of proxy roles? I've expressed views about an 'execute'
> permission in the past but these have fallen on deaf ears.
>
You could pro
Hi Duncan :-)
Cheers for the reply, but sorry, I'm not looking for a kludge solution.
I'm trying to find out if this is as intended, in which case there must
be a reason behind it (?!) or if it's a bug, in which case it needs to
be squashed...
thanks again,
Chris
_
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a few comments after a 5 minute play:
...
> - the -P option doesn't work properly.
> python z2.py -D -P 9000 still resulted in the PCGI server being run on
> port 8090.
> Wasn't there going to be an option so that servers which you don't use
> (monitor and P
> - start.bat still hasn't been renamed. It's not that bright since
> windows has had a start command for ages now... typing start.bat tries
> to 'start' something called .bat. doh...
> The only way to get it to work is
> "start.bat"
> or
> ./start
> which is very weird on an NT box although quit
> How come you can browse things like the objectIds and objectValues
> methods through the web? Surely this is exposing information
> that people
> shouldn't really know about?
You're right - and stop calling me shirley. :) This is something of
a holdover from the bobo days - if you are a method
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Brian Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How come you can browse things like the objectIds and objectValues
> > methods through the web? Surely this is exposing information
> > that people
> > shouldn't really know about?
>
> You're right - and stop calling me
Brian:
> > While I'm at it, is there any way to make DTML methods accessible to
> > objects (such as other DTML methods) but not through URLs
> > other than by
> > a tortuous series of proxy roles?
> > I've expressed views about an 'execute' permission in the
> > past but these
> > have fallen
I'm trying to port the PTK PersistentUserSource stuff to the new
LoginManager. A lot of things seem to be working, but I seem to have
fallen into a Catch 22:
1. UserSources.BasicUserSource defines self._defaultClass as LoginUser, where
UserSources.LoginUser is a simple RackMountable class (not a
Ty Sarna wrote:
> Can't you just turn off 'Access contents information' permission or
> whatever it is on a folder if you don't want people to call
> those things trough the web?
"Default security hole" notwithstanding, I would second this. FWIW,
being able to type http://blah/objectIds is a pr
>
> Hmm, another ZAZ fan :-)
>
Don't get me started... :^)
> > a holdover from the bobo days - if you are a method and you have a
> > docstring, you are accessible through the web (but still subject to
> > the std security rules). objectIds and objectValues are a good
> > example of things t
"Dan L. Pierson" wrote:
>
> I'm trying to port the PTK PersistentUserSource stuff to the new
> LoginManager. A lot of things seem to be working, but I seem to have
> fallen into a Catch 22:
>
> 1. UserSources.BasicUserSource defines self._defaultClass as LoginUser, where
> UserSources.LoginUser
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dan L. Pierson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I try to do it by setting _defaultClass to 'LoginMember', it fails
> because 'LoginMember' isn't in Products.meta_classes. In fact nothing
> relating to DemoPortal or any other ZClass product is in
> Products.meta_clas
At 03:18 PM 5/17/00 -0400, Dan L. Pierson wrote:
>I'm trying to port the PTK PersistentUserSource stuff to the new
>LoginManager. A lot of things seem to be working, but I seem to have
>fallen into a Catch 22:
>
>1. UserSources.BasicUserSource defines self._defaultClass as LoginUser, where
>UserS
At 10:01 PM 5/17/00 +0100, Steve Alexander wrote:
>
>The _defaultClass only needs to become DemoPortal.LoginMember before a
>Portal's LoginManager instance is created.
>
>Therefore, you can leave the _defaultClass as LoginUser until the
>"install" method of DemoPortalBase is called (PTKDemo/Portal
At 08:39 PM 5/17/00 +0400, Jepthte CLAIN wrote:
>
>I wonder if someone can send me a simple example using the ZPatterns
>framework. I read all the source, and I still can't figure out what is
>the relationship between the objects instantiated by the Racks and the
>Rackmountable objects. Also, why
Phillip J. Eby writes:
> At 10:01 PM 5/17/00 +0100, Steve Alexander wrote:
> >
> >The _defaultClass only needs to become DemoPortal.LoginMember before a
> >Portal's LoginManager instance is created.
> >
> >Therefore, you can leave the _defaultClass as LoginUser until the
> >"install" method
Ty Sarna writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Dan L. Pierson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If I try to do it by setting _defaultClass to 'LoginMember', it fails
> > because 'LoginMember' isn't in Products.meta_classes. In fact nothing
> > relating to DemoPortal or any other ZClass pr
I believe we discovered a problem with ZServer's ftp server.
(Zope 2.1.6)
I posted the following to the collector:
http://classic.zope.org:8080/Collector/1257/view
Has anyone else seen this problem? :
--
It appears that ZServer's active ftp mode may be broken, but probably
I'm running HPUX 10.20 and Oracle 8.0.3. My goal is to use ZOracleDA,
but first I must get DCOracle working. DCOracle compiles OK and I
am able to connect to the database when executing from the command line.
My test script is attached for reference.
My problem occurs when running in the Zope
Dear mailing list administrators
at least the digests have some deficiencies:
1. some message headers are corrupted (do not use RFC822
continuation style).
Example is: Zope-Dev digest, Vol 1 #517 - 17 msgs"
Message: 10
From: "Kevin Dangoor" <[EMAIL PROTEC
I'm testing 2.2a1.
I have some ZClasses which work fine in 2.1.6. I copied my Data.fs to
the new 2.2a1 install.
As a non-superuser I have taken ownership of the top level of the site.
When I try to access a zclass instance which uses manage_tabs in it's
index_html method, I get the traceback shown
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
>
> At 08:39 PM 5/17/00 +0400, Jepthte CLAIN wrote:
> >
> >I wonder if someone can send me a simple example using the ZPatterns
> >framework. I read all the source, and I still can't figure out what is
> >the relationship between the objects instantiated by the Racks and t
23 matches
Mail list logo
