ethan mindlace fremen wrote:
> The product page is now topic-ized. Please check your product to ensure
> that it's in the categories you want it to be in. A product can have
> more than one topic.
Cool :-)
The actual pages still aren't very legible though :(
Can the top row for each product b
I'd second the vote for xml-rpc/SOAP.
You probably want to take a look at Medusa for your xml-rpc server, it's a
piece of the proverbial piss, (Welsh slang for "it's easy").
I verified Zope and Medusa some time back against Dave Winer's validation
tests, and both came out well. Zope seems to be
Zopatistas!
The product page is now topic-ized. Please check your product to ensure
that it's in the categories you want it to be in. A product can have
more than one topic.
If there is any flamage/suggestions regarding chosen topics, please send
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ethan mindlace fremen
> I´m waiting for Zope´s support to SOAP but while it´s not
> there I´m
> tetsing a COM object that will handle the SOAP communication
> and will be
> calling this component using win32com moudle with Python. In
> fact that´s
> what I´m testing right now but untill now this COM object is
>
I´m waiting for Zope´s support to SOAP but while it´s not there I´m
tetsing a COM object that will handle the SOAP communication and will be
calling this component using win32com moudle with Python. In fact that´s
what I´m testing right now but untill now this COM object is not building
the ri
Monty Taylor wrote:
>
> Is anyone working on fixing DCOracle? I'll have someone look into if no
> one else is, but I'd prefer to spend the energy elsewhere if it's
> already being addressed. (The LOB support would be nice for me as well.)
I've got a partial rewrite, but the LOB support hasn't go
I'm fairly sure there's already a Zope COM interface, and I know Zope
can
do xml-rpc. And SOAP support is coming. So I would suggest building it
as an XMLRPC
or SOAP server, and then use the Zope client functionality already there
to
connect to it. I wouldn't do COM because I'm an Open Source b
Is anyone working on fixing DCOracle? I'll have someone look into if no
one else is, but I'd prefer to spend the energy elsewhere if it's
already being addressed. (The LOB support would be nice for me as well.)
"Matthew T. Kromer" wrote:
>
> Alexander Schad wrote:
> >
> > > Alex, Oracle 8i brok
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
> > After more pondering I decided to throw out the idea for typed
> > arguments. I was trying to solve a difficult problem with a
> > roundabout, and in the end more difficult solution.
>
> I thought that's what the following proposal was all abou
At 05:05 PM 8/1/00 +0200, Monty Taylor wrote:
>Good point. It still irks me to have two DA's though. It gets confusing
>enough
>with the three different DA's running around now, much less if one of
>them
>actually had two valid versions. What if we had two classes like you
>said, but
>then in the
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Good point. It still irks me to have two DA's though. It gets confusing
> enough
> with the three different DA's running around now, much less if one of
> them
> actually had two valid versions. What if we had two classes like you
> said, but
> then in t
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> > http://www.zope.org/Wikis/zope-dev/MethodGeddon
> >
> > Just been reading about this and I was wondering how is coming along...
>
> After more pondering I decided to throw out the idea for typed
> arguments. I was trying to solve a difficult problem with a
> roundabout,
From: Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I still don't get this :(
Here are the two and a half rules for deriving acquisition from a dotted
expression:
1. A.B == (B o A), where A is an unwrapped object
2. (self o parent).B ==
a. (self.B o (self o parent)), if B is found in 'self'
b
Good point. It still irks me to have two DA's though. It gets confusing
enough
with the three different DA's running around now, much less if one of
them
actually had two valid versions. What if we had two classes like you
said, but
then in the manage_addForm had a checkbox for Transactions enabl
"R. David Murray" wrote:
> > 1) Why does SimpleItem still have this?! Since so much, IIRC, is derived
> > from SimpleItem.Item, surely this goes very much against the grain of
> > 'everything should be protected unless I say otherwise'?
>
> If you read the docs about the 2.2 security changes, you
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Monty Taylor wrote:
> A question would be, what should the commit/rollback mechanism decide to
> do when the transaction deals with tables of both types.
It should raise ProgrammingError, "You're screwed".
If you need transactional capabilities, then you just can't mix
trans
> I'm developing, in python, some classes whose instances to be
> published by Zope, one of which is folder-like, i.e. is can contain
> instances. I want HTTP PUT requests which will create new object
> instances within instances of this folder-like class to be handled by
> a PUT function I de
I'm developing, in python, some classes whose instances to be
published by Zope, one of which is folder-like, i.e. is can contain
instances. I want HTTP PUT requests which will create new object
instances within instances of this folder-like class to be handled by
a PUT function I define. I ca
We were talking about this a while back and I believe came to a
consensus about having two different ZMySQL adapters, one for
transactions, one for not.
However, since each table can have a different type, this might not bode
too well for someone that needs a connection to draw from one table with
[ I am Zope user, not Zope developer, I send this article first to zope
users list but people advised me to discuss it on zope-dev ]
The zope Undo mechanics is nice for clearing simple mistakes, but the
screens filled with 'manage_edit by ...' does not provide too much
information. What I would l
Hi,
I want to create folder everywhere. So, I've built a tree that display a
part of a directory. In that directory, I want my guest to create folder
as deep as they can build. but, I can't : I'm limited to create folder in
the directory where I am. I know that I should use the tag ;
but I c
21 matches
Mail list logo
