Christopher Petrilli wrote:
>
> SMOC :-)
You're in the South Michigan Orienteering Club?
http://www.angelfire.com/mi/SMOC/
You think we should implement indexes using the Shell Multivariable
Optimising Controller?
http://www.yokogawa.com.sg/Public/Solution/SMOC.asp
Or some Simulation
Steve Alexander [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Christopher Petrilli wrote:
>
> >
> > SMOC :-)
>
> You're in the South Michigan Orienteering Club?
>http://www.angelfire.com/mi/SMOC/
Oh sorry, old reference... SMOC = Simple Matter of Code :)
Chris
--
| Christopher Petrilli
| [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi
I love the orphan feature in dtml-in - it works really well and demonstrates
the maturity of Zope Zen!
When batching results as a beginner in Zope - you tend to think that Zope
has a bug when not returning your results consistently (size=3 so why is it
giving me 4!), (some of my staff have j
I have two nice methods. One of them (methodA) is called via the web.
These belong to one class; classA.
class classA:
"doc string"
def methodA(self):
"doc string"
objects = self.methodB(self)
objects.reverse()
attrib = ''
for object in obj
Erik,
You're returning a mutable object from methodB. You should either return
an immutable object (such as a tuple or a string), or return a *copy* of
your mutable object.
some_list.reverse() reverses the list in-place. That's why you're seeing
the strange reversal results you report.
The e
I wasn't reading the code clearly the first time around.
By far the simplest place to return copied results from methodB is to
change the last line to
return objects[:]
Erik Enge wrote:
>
> def methodB(self, object, skip=[], stop=[], objects=[]):
> "doc string"
>
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 21:44:36 -0500, Christopher Petrilli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chris Withers [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>> "Michael R. Bernstein" wrote:
>> >
>> > Hmm. this seems like there ought to be a checkbox next to
>> > the 'Add Index' form field labeled 'index numbers?'. Or
>> > may
