Hello everyone,
I was recently working on a quite big ZSQL method (around 100 lines).
I was using only and tags and a lot of
"like '%...%'", so thought I could make things look much nicer using
and . But I ran
into a big hurdle:
I quickly searched through the archive and found the thread
"[
I highly recommend "the Quick Python Book" if you're already a programmer,
looking to learn the new language.
> From: Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> When I came to Zope, within a week I was getting ready to write a Python
> product. (And I didn't even know Python yet! :-) )
__
Hello everyone,
Okay, all good things are three, so here is the last announcement. I also
put SmartSections up on the server. Even though it is a big construction
place, I thought you might want to look at it.
Smart Section allows the End User which cannot write HTML code to design
sites onli
Hello everyone,
after a long night with a nice thunderstorm here in Nuremberg, I got the
SmartWizard (first version) finished.
Oh, you want to know what SmartWizard is? SmartWizard is a framework to
generate Wizards for all sort of applications. The wizards are designed
for the End User, so I tri
Hello everyone!
OrderedFolder (which is used by SmartWizard) is mainly a little patch to
the _setObject and _delObject method of the ObjectManager to support
'ordering' in ObjectManager-derived objects. It is a really tiny
adjustment, so I hope DC will put it in the core somewhen, since it won
At 07:20 PM 6/27/01 +0200, you wrote:
>Wrong Andy,
>writing Python products is far easier than guessing how to pass a variable
>to a DTML-method or other such DTML-Voodoo
Even though I agree, I have to say it more politically correct:
If you like clicky, clicky - interfaces, you like ZClasses
At 08:49 PM 6/27/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>Andy McKay wrote:
> > It depends on your experience. In your opinion you find it easier (now
> I can
> > write a Zope product in my sleep I agree). Most Zope users however, in my
> > experience, try ZClasses first.
>
>When I came to Zope, within a
> When I came to Zope, within a week I was getting ready to write a Python
> product. (And I didn't even know Python yet! :-) )
Shane, you by no means fit into a "Most Zope users" category :)
Cheers.
--
Andy McKay.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMA
Andy McKay wrote:
> It depends on your experience. In your opinion you find it easier (now I can
> write a Zope product in my sleep I agree). Most Zope users however, in my
> experience, try ZClasses first.
When I came to Zope, within a week I was getting ready to write a Python
product. (And I
It depends on your experience. In your opinion you find it easier (now I can
write a Zope product in my sleep I agree). Most Zope users however, in my
experience, try ZClasses first.
Cheers.
--
Andy McKay.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Rottermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andy" <
Wrong Andy,
writing Python products is far easier than guessing how to pass a variable
to a DTML-method or other such DTML-Voodoo
Robert
- Original Message -
From: "Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dieter Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Rene Pijlman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED
At 10:45 PM 6/27/01 +0200, Erik Enge wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
>
> > if there are always many objects to create, may be it would be better
> > to have a generic mechanism for asking users and represent
> > app-/management interfaces rather then copying all the stuff over
>if there are always many objects to create, may be it would be
>better to have a generic mechanism for asking users and
>represent app-/management interfaces rather then copying all
>the stuff over and over?
Well, the current wizard version (which I hope I will be able to release in
a couple m
On 26 Jun 2001 23:37:25 +0200, Erik Enge wrote:
> On 26 Jun 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
>
> > DC has been up-fron about how they make money. They do so by selling
> > development services using Zope as a toolkit/platform.
>
> Yes, and forcing those paying customers to use GPL is very hard
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> if there are always many objects to create, may be it would be better
> to have a generic mechanism for asking users and represent
> app-/management interfaces rather then copying all the stuff over and
> over?
That's what mk-zprod does. Or rather,
Hm. Wizard?
if there are always many objects to create, may be it would be
better to have a generic mechanism for asking users and
represent app-/management interfaces rather then copying all
the stuff over and over?
Regards
Tino
--On Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2001 08:54 -0500 Stephan Richter <[EMAIL
On 27 Jun 2001 09:06:16 -0400, Paul Everitt wrote:
>
> With great trepidation, I add a post to this thread. As Barry has
> mentioned, this has all been discussed a LOT. I'll try to summarize and
> clarify a few points:
>
> 1) I wanted to specifically address something in Michael's post here.
At 06:05 PM 6/27/01 +0200, Erik Enge wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
>
> > Exactly that. But the SmartWizard would provide you with a framework
> > to build this "Make New Python Product Wizard". If I get far enough, I
> > will release the pre alpha today, just you see the proo
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Paul Everitt wrote:
> It is a *desire* of ours to be GPL-compatible. Not a requirement, as
> it can be awfully tricky, complicated, and time-consuming to get
> there. But we've told people that we're intending to give it a shot.
That's much appretiated :)
___
I think it has changed for FieldIndexes. You can now make the distinction
between "doesnt have that attribute" and "attribute is one of [None, '', [],
()]" within a Field Index. You do this in an almost natural way, the major
exception being that you need to wrap a blank string ('') in a sequenc
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> Exactly that. But the SmartWizard would provide you with a framework
> to build this "Make New Python Product Wizard". If I get far enough, I
> will release the pre alpha today, just you see the proof of concept...
Cool! I'll be looking forward to i
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:42:40 -0700 (PDT), Michel Pelletier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hmm the reason for the current behavior was optimization by saving space
>not indexing empty values.
I was always very pleased with that characteristic, but I had not
realised it was a design goal.
I thought
Chris McDonough wrote:
>
> Hi casey,
>
> Changes were recently made to Field/Keyword Indexes so that they will
> store empty items. An equivalent change could be made to TextIndexes...
> we'd need to think about that a bit.
>
> But for your purposes, you might want to start out attempting to w
I'd like to add a quick clarification, then I'll reply more later.
Frederico brought up a good point that indicated I wasn't clear. It is
a *desire* of ours to be GPL-compatible. Not a requirement, as it can
be awfully tricky, complicated, and time-consuming to get there. But
we've told pe
>So what does it do? :)
It is a general Wizard Builder with which you could build a Wizard that
asks for all the necessary information to auto-generate a Python Product
(for example).
>What I'm thinking is this: maybe use SmartWizard to meta-program you
>Python Product; that creates a defini
hi,
i wanted to draw myself from this thread before annoying the whole list,
so i'll take paul mail as an excuse to write some final comments.
On 27 Jun 2001 09:06:16 -0400, Paul Everitt wrote:
> 1) I wanted to specifically address something in Michael's post here.
> We fully expect people to p
With great trepidation, I add a post to this thread. As Barry has
mentioned, this has all been discussed a LOT. I'll try to summarize and
clarify a few points:
1) I wanted to specifically address something in Michael's post here.
We fully expect people to profit from Zope, even if that mean
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> Okay, okay...I stayed up and typed it down pretty quick (2 hours). I
> attached it to this mail. It is plain text, since I was too lazy to do
> it in HTML. It might be a little unstructured, but I am too tired to
> fix that now.
So what does it do?
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Remi Delon wrote:
> I have a website where users can post messages (using a textarea).
> I would like to be able to spell-check what they submit and
> notify them of possible mistakes. (much like the online
> spell-checker of hotmail that I'm using right now :-))
>
> Has any
>Has anybody ever written anything for zope that does something
>similar ?
>I was thinking of using ispell, maybe through a pipe ?
>A search on "ispell" or even "spell" on the zope.org website
>doesn't give any interesting result (same on python.org).
I do not know about any spell checker either
Somewhere on the xmlrpc.com site there is reference to a spell checker that
can be used via xmlrpc, this could be used in Zope quite easily.
http://www.stuffeddog.com/speller/ I think is the place to look.
Phil
- Original Message -
From: "Remi Delon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROT
Hello,
I have a website where users can post messages (using a textarea).
I would like to be able to spell-check what they submit and
notify them of possible mistakes. (much like the online
spell-checker of hotmail that I'm using right now :-))
Has anybody ever written anything for zope that doe
"Magnus Heino (Rivermen)" wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> How can I do a url quote from a python script?
>
> Can I somehow access the method in urllib or DT_Var or how can it be done?
>
> --
>
> /Magnus Heino
>
Hi Magnus
You have to import url_quote like:
from Products.PythonScripts.standard import ur
33 matches
Mail list logo