Yo dudes,
just a stupid simple question:
After wrestling with the documentation, I have created my own CMF content
type and it actually works except for some details. In retrospect, it was
90% code browsing, and 10% useful
documentation,... cmf is fun, but the cmf dogbowl really sucks ..
Anyway,
Chris and Joachim -
Maybe this is too simplistic of an approach ... but why not have the
session data manager automatically create a new, session data
container (temporary storage) for a given zope version. The session
data manager can be optimized for the case of no version and then when
and i
> - I have an index_html method that calls an "initializeSession" method at
> the beginning to initialize certain session variables. (Is there another
way
> to do this?)
Yes, you can use an "script to call when objects are added" method in the
transient data container related to the session in or
I have a slight correction to make (which doesn't change the message of this
posting):
> - As the new sessioning code seems to be working within the transaction
> machinery, the SESSION.set action causes the mere display of an index_html
> page (that includes a session initialization method) to b
Hi!
I'm still having problems with the sessions. And I am beginning to think
that it's not me that is wrong, but the sessioning code has a major
conceptial flaw:
- I have an index_html method that calls an "initializeSession" method at
the beginning to initialize certain session variables. (Is t
ZopeCVS (trunk) from 9.1.2002; Python 2.1.1; Linux 2
I just met really strange behaviour:
For testing purposes, I did:
export ZODB_READ_ONLY=1
python
>>> import Zope
This lead to a deadlock in "ThreadLock.acquire".
I ran the process in GDB with breakpoints in "
- Original Message -
From: "Antonio Carrasco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:51 PM
Subject: ZODB based Product problem
> Don´t forget. I´m spanish and my english may not be enough good. Have fun
Don´t forget. I´m spanish and my english may not be enough good. Have fun
with this e-mail.
I´ve been a lot of time looking for documentation, studing it and trying to
develop usefull things with ZODB. Here is my problem.
Well. I´m working in a Product in wich I use a ZODB to store data. I don´t
Joachim Werner wrote:
> Thanks for the hint. I'll try using a versioning storage, though it might be
> rather inefficient I guess?
Most (all?) versioning storages are also undoing so you'll be keeping
undo data that will need to be packed away. It's also hard to manage an
undoing mounted sto
Hi!
Thanks for the hint. I'll try using a versioning storage, though it might be
rather inefficient I guess?
> > As the Temporary Storage is incompatible with versions, it seems to
> me that
> > I can not at all use any session manipulating code in a method that
> might be
>
> > called under
First, apologies for the cross posting. I need to make sure this gets
to as many people as possible, for obvious reasons...
Everyone's got grumbles about how zope.org is organised. Now is the
time to quit grumbling and do something about it. If you are a newbie
or a guru, please take the time
I hope the changes I made will work. :)
mfg as
Chris McDonough schrieb:
>
> This is correct. The current splitter implementation ignores digits.
> You can make your own implementation that does not.
>
> Andre Schubert wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After playing with Zope 2.4.3 and TextIndexes
Joachim Werner wrote:
> As the Temporary Storage is incompatible with versions, it seems to
me that
> I can not at all use any session manipulating code in a method that
might be
> called under version control. This is very disturbing to me.
I'm sorry you're disturbed. ;-)
> Are there
Hi!
I have a problem concerning using versions and sessions together in Zope 2.5
beta 3:
As the Temporary Storage is incompatible with versions, it seems to me that
I can not at all use any session manipulating code in a method that might be
called under version control. This is very disturbing
This is correct. The current splitter implementation ignores digits.
You can make your own implementation that does not.
Andre Schubert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After playing with Zope 2.4.3 and TextIndexes i found out that the
> TextIndex does not Index Digits( "12345" ).
> Thatswhy i looked in
Hi all,
After playing with Zope 2.4.3 and TextIndexes i found out that the
TextIndex does not Index Digits( "12345" ).
Thatswhy i looked in the sources and i saw in "next_word", that there is
the caracter checked with "isalnum", but in "check_synstop" the caracter
is checked with "isalpha"?
T
dear zope gurus,
i hope, this is the right place to post this:
i'm trying to modify a modified ZSyncer product.
The first modification implements bidirectional syncronisation.
It simply exports any Zope object, transmitts it via XML-RPC and imports it
remotely, or vice versa.
The problem i'm tr
17 matches
Mail list logo