> However, I do build Python with gcc 3.1 (cvs) and Python 2.1.2 and with
> various compile options can get a 17% speedup.
Could you share the compile options with us?
seb
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/
On Tuesday, February 12, 2002, at 07:17 AM, seb bacon wrote:
>> However, I do build Python with gcc 3.1 (cvs) and Python 2.1.2 and with
>> various compile options can get a 17% speedup.
>
> Could you share the compile options with us?
>
> seb
>
OK, but be warned -- gcc cvs isnt guaranteed stab
Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
> OK, but be warned -- gcc cvs isnt guaranteed stable, so often I have to
> hand tweak things (rebuilding certain modules with different options, etc.)
In my experience, *any* gcc can produce crap code if you feed it the
wrong options.
It may be fun to play with optio
On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 12:36, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, February 12, 2002, at 07:17 AM, seb bacon wrote:
>
> >> However, I do build Python with gcc 3.1 (cvs) and Python 2.1.2 and with
> >> various compile options can get a 17% speedup.
> >
> > Could you share the compile options wi
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 12:17:28PM +, seb bacon wrote:
> > However, I do build Python with gcc 3.1 (cvs) and Python 2.1.2 and with
> > various compile options can get a 17% speedup.
>
> Could you share the compile options with us?
I'd like to see those compile options as well...
Thanks,
