> I wholeheartedly agree that 2.6 needs to be significantly a community
> effort. While I know that many people are engaged in the Zope 3 effort,
> we also need to get some people engaged on defining and producing
> 2.6 in the interim. There is not much on the plan right now, so the
> possibilitie
Hi,
John Ziniti schrieb:
>
> > > Let's get a discussion
> >
> >> started to define 2.6
> >
>
> I'd like to see the ZSyncer Product, or a variant thereof, included in
> Zope by default. That is, I'd like "Synchronization", to a be a default
> property of Zope objects, so that objects/conten
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 15:17, Eric Roby wrote:
> > > > Let's get a discussion
> > > >
> > >> started to define 2.6
> >
> > I'd like to see the ZSyncer Product, or a variant thereof, included in
> > Zope by default. That is, I'd like "Synchronization", to a be a default
> > property of Zope objects,
> > > Let's get a discussion
> >
> >> started to define 2.6
> >
>
> I'd like to see the ZSyncer Product, or a variant thereof, included in
> Zope by default. That is, I'd like "Synchronization", to a be a default
> property of Zope objects, so that objects/content can be pushed and
> pulled
> > Let's get a discussion
>
>> started to define 2.6
>
I'd like to see the ZSyncer Product, or a variant thereof, included in
Zope by default. That is, I'd like "Synchronization", to a be a default
property of Zope objects, so that objects/content can be pushed and
pulled between two Zope i
Hmm... would this still work with Squid or Apache caching in front of Zope?
I assume that since each browser can accept different transfer-encodings,
this has to be done as close to the browser as possible, otherwise content
sent in one transfer encoding would be sent to every user if it was to
FYI,
I have set up a Wiki that should provide a usable documentation
of the Zopes BTrees package. The Wiki is still evolving but it
explains (hopefully) the most important datatypes, their API
and other helper functions.
URL:
http://www.zope.org/Members/ajung/BTrees/FrontPage
Cheers,
Andreas
http://freshmeat.net/projects/log4py/
Romain Slootmaekers wrote:
> Yo,
> questions wrt logging:
>
> -) What are the plans to improve the rather primitive logging facilities
> in zope ?
> I couldn't find anything in the plan for 2.6, nor on the 3.0 homepage.
> I think we need at least an extendi
> I've modified HTTPResponse and ZServer/HTTPResponse.py to allow for gzip
content
> encoding on a response-by-response basis. I'm mostly using this with
xml-rpc, but it
> could be generalized and combined with a gzipper- cache manager.
I'd like this. It would help with the lack of transfer-enc
Yo,
questions wrt logging:
-) What are the plans to improve the rather primitive logging facilities
in zope ?
I couldn't find anything in the plan for 2.6, nor on the 3.0 homepage.
I think we need at least an extendibl framework with following types of
components:
- Loggers (fi, file logger, db
On Thursday 28 February 2002 02:51 pm, Leonardo Rochael Almeida allegedly
wrote:
[snip]
> When you see the result page, you know that your pythonScripts are
> recompiled (of course it won't take that long unless you have an 800+MiB
> Data.fs crammed full of python scripts :-)
>
> Cheers, Leo
I h
On Thursday 28 February 2002 04:03 pm, you wrote:
> Brian Lloyd wrote:
> > Let's get a discussion
> >
> > started to define 2.6.
>
> This isn't exciting by any means unless you're one of the people who
> package Zope up for distribution, or maybe you're one of the people who
> manage lots of litt
Both catalogs were ok.
BTW this patch is needed:
--- check_catalog.pyThu Feb 28 22:13:30 2002
+++ check_catalog.pyThu Feb 28 22:23:15 2002
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
if o in ['--FieldIndex','--KeywordIndex','--PathIndex']:
indexes.append(o[2:])
-checkCatalog(args,index
Brian Lloyd wrote:
> Let's get a discussion
> started to define 2.6.
This isn't exciting by any means unless you're one of the people who
package Zope up for distribution, or maybe you're one of the people who
manage lots of little Zopes on one system; but I'd like to revive the
"grand unifi
Well...that should not happen :-)
Maybe try the check_catalog.py script from Zope 2.5.X
to find any problems in the indexes.
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Florent Guillaume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: local.lists.zope.zope-dev
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28
Ok forget about it, I was unindexing and indexing from several catalogs,
and mixed some of them up. All is well now.
(However the message was still strange...)
Florent
Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2.5.0 linux binary release, sorry.
>
> Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2.5.0 linux binary release, sorry.
Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what zope version ?
>
> - aj
> - Original Message -
> From: "Florent Guillaume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: local.lists.zope.zope-dev
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 13:45
> S
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 16:09, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 10:55, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 27, 2002, at 06:49 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
> > wrote:
> >
> > > So, what should I try now?
> > >
> >
> > Did -t 1 help? If not, do you feel
On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 02:09 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
wrote:
>
> Funny enough, running with -t 1 solved it.
>
> /me starts looking sideways to ZMySQLDA again, since it's not the new
> beta version...
>
Good!
Based on the fact that I'm not being innundated with "I'm still
crash
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 10:55, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, February 27, 2002, at 06:49 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
> wrote:
>
> > So, what should I try now?
> >
>
> Did -t 1 help? If not, do you feel comfortable hooking up gdb and
> getting a traceback?
Funny enough, running
what zope version ?
- aj
- Original Message -
From: "Florent Guillaume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: local.lists.zope.zope-dev
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 13:45
Subject: [Zope-dev] FieldIndex unindex_object could not remove... This
should not happen.
> P
Playing with workflow switching in CMF, I sometimes have this message:
2002-02-28T18:33:06 ERROR(200) FieldIndex unindex_object could not remove documentId
-862940561 from index review_state. This should not happen.
Traceback (innermost last):
File /home/zope/test-zope/lib/python/Products/Plu
Either you become an official Zope committer with write-access
to the CVS or by providing reasonable patches, documentation if
needed and updated unit tests.
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Clements" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1
I went to http://dev.zope.org/Resources/zope_260_plan.html and logged in, but couldn't
see any way to contribute comments to this page. I could comment on major projects,
but none of them fit my objective.
--
I've modified HTTPResponse and ZServer/HTTPResponse.py to allow for gzip content
enc
Hi all -
Paul sent a note to zope-coders some time back fishing for
some feedback regarding planning for a Zope 2.6 (excepted):
> I propose that planning for a 2.6 focus on the following thoughts:
>
> 1) This release is more about community-contributed work than
> ZC-contributed work.
> ...
On Wednesday, February 27, 2002, at 06:49 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
wrote:
> So, what should I try now?
>
Did -t 1 help? If not, do you feel comfortable hooking up gdb and
getting a traceback?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
Hi
I'm currently developing a product called "ftpFolder". This product is
designed to make Zope easier to use with webDAV and ftp. It tackles a
few common problems that occur when using these tools to edit Zope.
Firstly Zope prefers to have no extension on the files it stores, this
breaks alot
27 matches
Mail list logo
