On 1 Aug 2002, Gary Poster wrote:
> Given a hypothetical folder-like instance called "myFLI", we would
> presumably want, in CVS (or Subversion, or whatever) a folder named
> "myFLI" containing the children and a file named, to borrow your
> example, "myFLI.properties.zexp" that *only* contains t
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 22:13, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> On 1 Aug 2002, Gary Poster wrote:
>
> > Hi Shane. I've been thinking about Zope versioning, and I also did a
> > bit of list searches for past discussions on this general topic. One
> > problem that seems pertinent to really any external-to-z
On 1 Aug 2002, Gary Poster wrote:
> Hi Shane. I've been thinking about Zope versioning, and I also did a
> bit of list searches for past discussions on this general topic. One
> problem that seems pertinent to really any external-to-zope versioning
> system, including Subversion, is dealing wit
Gary Poster wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 15:04, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
>
>>There are a few products on zope.org for integrating with CVS. Look
>>through the downloadable products. I think there are CVSFolder and
>>ZCVSFile (or something like that), maybe more.
>>
>>However, most version c
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 15:04, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> There are a few products on zope.org for integrating with CVS. Look
> through the downloadable products. I think there are CVSFolder and
> ZCVSFile (or something like that), maybe more.
>
> However, most version control tools are difficult
- Original Message -
From: "Leonardo Rochael Almeida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Zope Developers list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Removing the acquisition wrapper from an object(Python script)
> On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 14:38, Gilles
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 14:38, Gilles Lenfant wrote:
> [...]
> Now I'm always looking for an alternate way to get rid of the acquisition wrapper
>and access only the objects own props.
To access an object's own props (and get an error if it doesn't find
them instead of looking up the aq-chain) you
On Thursday 01 August 2002 12:04 pm, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
> Subversion, however, gives us a new opportunity. The first alpha has
> been released. Communicating with a Subversion repository involves
> HTTP, WebDAV, and DeltaV--all documented, open standards. So Zope could
> talk to a Subversi
and how to do this is not clear to me..
can someone clue me in.
Thanks,
Mike
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/
Mehran erfani wrote:
> I am a newbie to the zope world and recently started
> using zope in our corporate development environment.
> One thing that I couldn't find so far is an easy way
> to use cvs for revision control for individual
> components developed in zope. I understand that zope
> has it
I am a newbie to the zope world and recently started
using zope in our corporate development environment.
One thing that I couldn't find so far is an easy way
to use cvs for revision control for individual
components developed in zope. I understand that zope
has its own version control system and
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:34:30PM -0400, Martijn Pieters wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:29:36AM -0600, Jeffrey P Shell wrote:
> > Hopefully I'll get a chance to test it with some of our 2.5 sites - I have a
> > small worry that old code on small sites that we don't have much worry about
> >
Gilles Lenfant wrote:
> manage_permission(self, permission_to_manage, roles=[], acquire=0, REQUEST=None)
>
> Just use this method in an "untrusted" python script on any Zope object, add to it
>Manager proxy, and you're done.
That method just tweaks the permissions settings. It certainly doesn't
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gilles Lenfant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Toby Dickenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Removing the acquisition wrapper from an object (Python scr
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:29:36AM -0600, Jeffrey P Shell wrote:
> Hopefully I'll get a chance to test it with some of our 2.5 sites - I have a
> small worry that old code on small sites that we don't have much worry about
> will break if this is put into a 2.5.2 or later release. Could there be
On 8/1/02 10:08 AM, "Martijn Pieters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:46:44AM -0400, Martijn Pieters wrote:
>> I am about to land some big changes in the way DTML deals with data taken
>> from the REQUEST object when accessed implicitly, in both the Zope Trunk
>> and the Z
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:46:44AM -0400, Martijn Pieters wrote:
> I am about to land some big changes in the way DTML deals with data taken
> from the REQUEST object when accessed implicitly, in both the Zope Trunk
> and the Zope 2.5 branch. These changes could potentially break existing
> Zope s
- Original Message -
From: "Toby Dickenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gilles Lenfant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Removing the acquisition wrapper from an object (Python script)
On Thursday 01 Aug 2002 2:44 pm,
Hi folks,
I am about to land some big changes in the way DTML deals with data taken
from the REQUEST object when accessed implicitly, in both the Zope Trunk
and the Zope 2.5 branch. These changes could potentially break existing
Zope sites.
Without these changes, Zope is somewhat vulnerable to c
On Thursday 01 Aug 2002 2:44 pm, Gilles Lenfant wrote:
> I can't understand that reason because it's also easy to strip away an
> object's security settings in an untrusted python script that has a Manager
> proxy. Well, I'm gonna make my 2 or 3 lines External method :(
If thats true, its a bug.
- Original Message -
From: "Toby Dickenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gilles Lenfant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Removing the acquisition wrapper from an object (Python script)
On Thursday 01 Aug 2002 12:49 pm,
A lot of people would like to see these things cleaned up, but
unfortunately unless it becomes a pressing need for someone it doesn't
get done (for lack of time).
If you have some experience with that, and have ideas on how to fix
things (and check that they work ok), please do write some patches
On Thursday 01 Aug 2002 12:49 pm, Gilles Lenfant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> aq_base(someObject) doesn't work in a python script. I need to get an
> object without its acquisition wrapper.
It cant be done in untrusted code, because it would let you strip away its
security settings.
You could write an exte
Hi,
aq_base(someObject) doesn't work in a python script. I need to get an object without
its acquisition wrapper.
Any hint ?
Many thanks in advance
--Gilles
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-
> > I have a Zope 2.5.1 using ZEO on Linux, with Apache as proxy server.
The two
> > ZEO clients run fine for a couple of hours, and then suddenly one of
them
> > stops responding. It's the type of Zope hangs when all processes are
fine,
> > but ZServer just doesn't respond (load is very low,
25 matches
Mail list logo
