> It would be fine if we could get a reproducable testcase
> for this problem.
Absolutely. When the error we see occurs, the RID that is looked for
has already gone missing. It looks like the real error happens silently
sometime before, and not in all cases: the majority of the instances of
the
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:37:16AM +0200, Jean Jordaan wrote:
> >>Have you tried it in 2.6?
> >
> >Yeah, this'd be my suggestion having suffered more terminally from
> >exactly these bugs :-S
>
> Hmm! That's interesting. I was worried that we might be causing it
> by tickling the Catalog the wr
>> Have you tried it in 2.6?
>
> Yeah, this'd be my suggestion having suffered more terminally from
> exactly these bugs :-S
Hmm! That's interesting. I was worried that we might be causing it
by tickling the Catalog the wrong way .. Did you ever get to the
bottom of the bugs? Do they have coll
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:50:56 -0400
Casey Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 30 September 2002 08:36 am, Roché Compaan wrote:
> > Don't know if this will help but these errors specifically occur with
> > 'lines' properties with Keyword Indexes on them.
> >
> > What is also significant
Chris Withers wrote:
> How come getSecurityManager().getUser() returns the Anonymous User in
> access rules? Surely some checks must have been done to see whether the
> folder containing the access rule can be traversed to?
>
> If not, then huh? I'm confused :-(
Access Rules trigger during pub
Help!!
I am trying to write a product that will encapsulate a SQL query and
render the results in a table. But I'm having a terrible time getting
at the data in the SQL results.
This works in DTML:
But if I try this in my product's code directly:
result = apply(sql_method, (), {})
fo
Toby Dickenson wrote:
>
>>Our app has been hitting these errors for months:
>
> Have you tried it in 2.6? A couple of bug in this area have been fixed since
> 2.5.x
Yeah, this'd be my suggestion having suffered more terminally from exactly these
bugs :-S
cheers,
Chris
Hi,
How come getSecurityManager().getUser() returns the Anonymous User in access
rules? Surely some checks must have been done to see whether the folder
containing the access rule can be traversed to?
If so, then why is the anonymous user still being returned?
If not, then huh? I'm confused :
> If you feel this is a bug, you should file a collector issue for it.
We don't have a deep enough understanding of the Catalog to diagnose :/
We're not sure if it's a Catalog issue, or something we're doing wrong;
i.e. we don't know how the Catalog gets into that state.
--
Jean Jordaan
Upfront
On Monday 30 September 2002 08:36 am, Roché Compaan wrote:
> Don't know if this will help but these errors specifically occur with
> 'lines' properties with Keyword Indexes on them.
>
> What is also significant is that there are legitimate duplicates in the
> lines properties and that they are du
On Monday 30 Sep 2002 1:17 pm, Jean Jordaan wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Our app has been hitting these errors for months:
Have you tried it in 2.6? A couple of bug in this area have been fixed since
2.5.x
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://l
Don't know if this will help but these errors specifically occur with
'lines' properties with Keyword Indexes on them.
What is also significant is that there are legitimate duplicates in the
lines properties and that they are duplicated on the index data as well.
This doesn't feel right. I would
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 09:17, Toby Dickenson wrote:
> On Saturday 28 Sep 2002 4:38 pm, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
> > This instructs the browser it should send the content of the form in the
> > accepted charset.
>
> Yes, accept-charset could be part of a full solution to this
Hi!
I'm writing a proprietary set of python classes for my product. As part of
this product, there is a base class with redefined index_html method. This
method looks for some object (practically, DTML Method) in it's context with
predefined id and tries to call it.
The problem is that my object
Hi all
Our app has been hitting these errors for months:
2002-09-30T11:06:27 ERROR(200) KeywordIndex unindex_object could not remove
documentId -444153566 from index ComponentVersions. This should not happen.
Traceback (innermost last):
File
/usr/local/zope/2-5-1/lib/python/Products/Plugin
Colin Leath wrote:
>
> I think this is a problem with the plain StructuredTextDocument
> lacking it's own request object.
The REQUEST object is an object representing the HTTP REQUEST as is usually
acquired, so STD's (nice ;-) obviously aren't managing to acquire the REQUEST in
the context you
16 matches
Mail list logo
