Why, in standard OFS\ObjectManager.py do you reject
Object Id's with % character ?
I've modified the 45th line of Python
script
from : bad_id=re.compile(r'[^a-zA-Z0-9-_~,.$\(\)# ]').search #TS
to bad_id=re.compile(r'[^a-zA-Z0-9-_~,.$\(\)#
]%').search #TS
and every thing seems all-right ;-
> > There are a small set of proposed features centering around better
> > configuration and management of ZEO and ZODB.
> >
> > Feedback is welcome.
>
> Not explicitly mentioned on that list, but improved logging is tied up with
> better daemon support. I think Chris M has been looking at zope l
Hello zope-dev, as a suggestion from another mailing list user i have
forwarded my current problem to this list. To summarize it seems that due
to some hard drive corruption my zopedb has been left open with a
lot of open transactions. When i try to clean the db with fsrecover i get
numerous ve
Hello:
I am trying to add some unit tests for my XMLTransform product
that test URL to Zope object traversal. For example, I want
to ensure that one XSLT (a zope object) can include another using
Zope should transform the above into a request for a zope object
with an ID of "foo.xsl" in the pa
Tim Hicks wrote:
As is the standard cry at these times - 'will this be fixed in Zope3?'
Tch. *Everything* will be fixed in Zope 3, doncha know!
Seriously, though, Zope 3 is using a refactored services model with
stuff like SOAP and XML_RPC on the designers minds from the start. If
it doesn'
Dear All,
We are considering Zope as a platform for product development in
our company. There are a few important requirements the
availability of which was not obvious to me.
1. PKI support for authenticating users using client-side
certificates (obviously over a SSL connection). To be used
Evan Simpson said:
> Tim Hicks wrote:
>> Given a call signature like:
>>
>> def method(self, *args, **kw)
>>
>> In this way, mapply.py seems to ignore the fact that I want my method
>> to accept an arbitrary number of arguments (line 69).
>
> When mapply was written, its only purpose was to map exp
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 3:12 pm, Infoman: Martin Kretschmar wrote:
> Is this a known behaviour of WinNT Workstation
> as opposed to e.g. WinNT Server or W2K Server?
no
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/li
Hello,
are there any known artifical limitations of
WinNT Workstation as opposed to e.g. WinNT
Server regarding the scheduling scheme of
the threads?
For e.g. the medusa thread receives a http
request and "passes" it to the pool of ZORB
threads.
We have a small Zope product which remains
sleepin
> Gilles Lenfant wrote:
> >
> > I know I can get the root object using self.getPhysicalRoot()
> > But I'm in a situation where I can't get that "self" or any other Zope
> > object.
>
> Sounds like a very strange situation, tell us more about it...
>
Not that strange...
I need to get the Zope root
Gilles Lenfant wrote:
I know I can get the root object using self.getPhysicalRoot()
But I'm in a situation where I can't get that "self" or any other Zope
object.
Sounds like a very strange situation, tell us more about it...
cheers,
Chris
___
Zop
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 7:04 pm, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> There are a small set of proposed features centering around better
> configuration and management of ZEO and ZODB.
>
> Feedback is welcome.
Not explicitly mentioned on that list, but improved logging is tied up with
better daemon suppor
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 23:02, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>
> i personally don't see a way to completely avoid ZODB bloat with a
> counter product stored in the ZODB itself. IMHO it is inherently bad to
> use ZODB-based hit counters in general for that very reason.
>
Just an idea from the 'could-be-d
13 matches
Mail list logo
