Thanks Leo, this is very helpful. It should probably be in a HOWTO
somewhere. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Leonardo Rochael Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 01:01, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
> > > Bjorn Stabell wrote:
> >
> > I would like
> >
> >
> > ...
Hi.
> I am currently looking at getting this into 2.6.1 or 2.6.2. I would
> appreciate confirmation that you are all happy with this combination
> of patches.
Thank you:-)
BTW, I was asked for upload my patch on collector.
Could you put it in a issue 737 page? I don't permit to upload it.
Regar
Hi, Toby
Thank you for following the issue.
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:33:40 +
Toby Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 21 December 2002 10:54 pm, Kazuya FUKAMACHI wrote:
>
> > I applied Toby's patch + Yousei's patch, and it works.
> >
> > Thanks to your neat piece of work,
> > I
Hi all -
There has been some discussion lately regarding whether or not
the next Zope feature release (2.7) should require Python 2.2.2
or not. For background, this is something that was already on the
project plan, with the idea being that it would be easier to
backport interesting things fro
I wanted to add a little more security to a zope site that has no
firewall in front of it but is mostly for internal users. To do this I
put a check in the accept callback of http_server. Not sure how much
security increase this really gives but I wonder if anyone would find it
useful (or if anyo
I am trying to attach images and other binary data to an email. The
text attachment works fine.
(I would like to hide the following label(s) if possible...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="my.ip.501.473.1042563430.436.4336")
Following the dtml documents is the mail I g
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 01:01, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
> > Bjorn Stabell wrote:
>
> I would like
>
>
> ...
>
>
> to call different functions. The first renders the object, the second
> returns a mapping of the content's attributes/properties, the third
> checks for "trueness" of the content.
> On Monday 13 January 2003 7:46 pm, Casey Duncan wrote:
>
> > I personally feel like Zope should run on 2.2.x whether required or not.
> > Requiring 2.2.x does have the advantage of limiting the possible blessed
> > configurations on which Zope will run, thereby making development, support
> > an
Bjorn Stabell wrote:
I would like
...
to call different functions. The first renders the object, the second
returns a mapping of the content's attributes/properties, the third
checks for "trueness" of the content. Rendering a content could be an
expensive operation and I don't want to
On Saturday 21 December 2002 10:54 pm, Kazuya FUKAMACHI wrote:
> I applied Toby's patch + Yousei's patch, and it works.
>
> Thanks to your neat piece of work,
> I can start to work on Zope 2.6.0 now, and go farther.
I am currently looking at getting this into 2.6.1 or 2.6.2. I would appreciate
c
On Monday 13 January 2003 7:46 pm, Casey Duncan wrote:
> I personally feel like Zope should run on 2.2.x whether required or not.
> Requiring 2.2.x does have the advantage of limiting the possible blessed
> configurations on which Zope will run, thereby making development, support
> and bug fixing
11 matches
Mail list logo